Summary
Pollen data were compared from (1) Burkard and Durham collectors located in urban Tucson, and (2) Burkard collectors located in urban and native desert environments.Morus was the most common pollen taxon collected in urban Tucson; its presence nearly tripled annual urban pollen totals. Spearman rank correlation was. 56 (p=.05) among the annual mean value of 24 principal pollen taxa collected using the two techniques. In urban areas, several taxa (i.e., Cruciferae,Plantago, cf.Aster, Cercidium andCeltis) were collected consistently using Burkard samplers; they were infrequently collected using the Durham sampler. The Durham calendar contained spring and summerAmbrosia seasons of equal importance; whereas, the urban and desert Burkard calendars reported a dominant springAmbrosia season accounting for over 85% of the annualAmbrosia pollen. Some pollen taxa from urban areas (i.e.,Populus, Ligustrum andTamarix) remained in the urban environment; conversely, some desert taxa (i.e., springAmbrosia, Larrea, Ephedra and summerCeltis) reached urban areas. Montane pollen taxa (i.e.,Alnus, summerPinus, Quercus andArtemisia) reached urban and desert environments of the Tucson basin in similar amounts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
References
Durham O.C., (1946) —The volumetric incidence of airborne allergens. IV. A proposed standard method of gravity sampling, counting, and volumetric interpolation of results. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.17:79–86.
Hevly R.H., Renner L.E., (1984) —Pollen spores and other atmospheric particulates, Flagstaff, Arizona. J. Az. Nev. Acad. Sci.19:121–132.
Käpylä M., Penttinen A., (1981) —An evaluation of the microscopical counting methods of the tape in Hirst-Burkard pollen and spore trap. Grana20:131–141.
Lucking J.C., Benjamin A.C., Everson D.A., Monroe N.L., (1988) —Arizona Statistical Review. 44th Annual Edition, Valley National Bank of Arizona, pp. 89.
Odgen E.C., Raynor G.S., Hayes J.V., Lewis D.M., Haines J.H., (1974) —Manual for Sampling Airborne Pollen. Hafner Press, New York, pp. 182.
O'Rourke M.K., (1980) —Pollen dispersal and its relationship to respiratory disease. pp. 81–88. In: Proc. First Internat. Conf. Aerobiology, Ed. Federal Environmental Agency, Erich Schmidt, Berlin, 471 pp.
O'Rourke M.K., (1982) —Composition and distribution of urban vegetation. J. Arid Envir.5:235–248.
O'Rourke M.K., (1986) —The implications of atmospheric pollen rain for fossil pollen profiles in the arid southwest. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, 169 pp.
O'Rourke M.K., (1989) —Relationships between airborne pollen concentrations and weather parameters in the arid environment. In: Proc. Aerobiology, Health, Environment, A Symposium. Ed. Paul Comtois. University of Montreal.
Phillips E.W., (1926) —Hay fever in central Arizona. Southwest. Med10:4.
Phillips E.W., (1930) —Ragweed hay fever in the Salt River Valley; second note. Southwest. Med.16:70.
Phillips E.W., (1932) —Pollen incidence in central Arizona. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.3:489–494.
Randolph H., McNeil M., (1944) —Pollen studies of the Phoenix area. J Allergy Clin. Immunol.15:125.
Solomon A.M., Hayes H.D., (1972) —Desert pollen production I: Quantitative influence of moisture. J. Az Acad. Sci.7:52–74.
Solomon A.M., Hayes H.D., (1980) —Impacts of urban development upon allergic pollen in a desert city. J. Arid Envir.3:169–178.
Walkington D.L., (1960) —A survey of the hay fever plants and important atmospheric allergens in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area. J. Allergy31:25–41.
Wershing H.F., Peter G.A., (1979) —A preliminary report on pollen and spore prevalence in the Sun City area, Sun City, Arizona. Boswell Hospital Proc. Sun City, Arizona,5:47–54.
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O'Rourke, M.K. Comparative pollen calendars from Tucson, Arizona: Durhamvs. Burkard samplers. Aerobiologia 6, 136 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539105
Key words
- Arizona
- pollen calendar
- samplers