Skip to main content
Log in

Upland interfluve (Doab) deposition: Alternative model to muddy overbank deposits

  • Published:
Facies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Major alluvial plains contain large tracts of fine-grained muddy sediments, deposited away from the main river channels, which are mostly classed as overbank or floodplain deposits. Systematic study of the Ganga plain shows that such large tracts of deposition of muddy sediments are located several metres above the major channels, and are not flooded by overtopping of the major river channels. These surfaces are here designated as upland interfluve areas (Doab) where deposition of fine-grained sediments takes place independent of the processes operating in the main channels. The surfaces show distinct depositional domains with characteristic deposits. These include higher sloping surfaces (mottled silt), lower flat surfaces (variegated clayey silt), gulleys (sandy silt), small channels (mottled silty sand), ponds (shelly sandy clayey silt), lakes (shelly clayey silt). These deposits are prone to diagenetic changes, especially the development of calcrete horizons. Redistribution of these domains through time produces characteristic mud-dominant alluvial stratigraphy as observed in the Late Quaternary deposits of the Ganga plain. This succession shows similarity to mud-dominant deposits of the Siwalik succession. These Doab deposits are distinct from the overbank deposits formed close to the river channels affected by channel processes. It is argued that many of the thick mud-dominant fluvial deposits of the ancient fluvial record are products of deposition in upland interfluve areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, A.K., Rizvi, M.H., Singh, I.B., Kumar, A. &Chandra, S. (1992): Carbonate deposits in Ganga Plain.—In:Singh, I.B., (1992, ed.): Gangetic Plain: Terra Incognita.—35–44, Lucknow (Geology Department, Lucknow University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, P.A., Talling, P.J. & Burbank, D.W. (1993): Braided stream and flood plain deposition in rapidly aggrading basin: the Escanilia formation, Spanish Pyrenees.—In:Best, J.L. & Bristow, C.S. (eds.): Braided Rivers.—Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ.,75, 177–194, London

  • Burbank, D.W. &Beck, R.A. (1991): Models of aggradation versus progradation in the Himalayan Foreland.—Geol. Rundschau.,80, 623–638, Berlin

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K.M. (1987): Sedimentology and facies architecture of overbank deposits of the Mississippi River, False River region, Louisiana.—In:Ethridge, F.G., Flores, R.M. & Harvey, M.D. (eds.): Recent Development in Fluvial Sedimentology.—Soc. Econ. Palaeont. Min., Special Publication,39, 111–120, Tulsa

  • Johnson, G.D. (1977): Palaeonpedology ofRamapithecus bearing sediments, North India.—Geol. Rundschau,66, 192–216, Berlin

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.N., Stix, J., Tauxe, L., Cerveny, P.F. &Tahirkheli, R.A.K. (1985): Palaeomagnetic chronology, fluvial processes and tectonic implications of the Siwalik deposits near Chinji Village, Pakistan.—J. Geol.,93, 27–40, Boulder

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Singh, I.B., Singh, M. &Singh, D.S. (1995): Depositional pattern in upland surface of Central Ganga Plain near Lucknow.—J. Geol. Soc. India,46, 545–555, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Singh, M., Chandel, R.S., & Singh, I.B. (1992): Geomorphic evolution of Lucknow area using remote sensing data analysis.—Proceeding National Symposium on Remote Sensing for Sustainable Development, R.S.A.C.-up, 269–272, Lucknow

  • Kumar, R. &Tandon, S.K. (1985): Sedimentology of Plio-Pleistocene late orogenic deposits associated with intraplate subduction-The Upper Siwalik Subgroup of a part of Punjab Sub-Himalaya.—Sed. Geol.,42, 105–158, Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall, A.D. (1996). The Geology of Fluvial Deposits.—582 pp., Berlin (Springer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, A.B. (1963): Alluvial morphology of Upper Ganga Yamuna Doab.—The Deccan Geographer,2, 1–36, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, B.D. (1982): Ground water resources of Uttar Pradesh, India.—In:Singhal, B.B.S. (ed.): Engineering Geoscience.— 111–131, New Delhi (Sarita Prakashan)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, P. (1976): Structure and sedimentological history of the overbank deposits of a Mississippi River point bar.—J. Sed. Petrol.,46, 788–801, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I.B. (1972): On the bedding in the natural-levee and the point bar deposits of the Gomti River, Uttar Pradesh, India. —Sed. Geol.,7, 309–317, Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1987): Sedimentological history of Quaternary deposit of Gangetic Plain.—Indian J. Earth Sci.,14, 272–282, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1992): Geological evolution of Gangetic Plain: Present status.—In:Singh, I.B. (1992, ed.). Gangetic Plain: Terra Incognita.—1–14, Lucknow (Geology Department, Lucknow University)

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996a): Late Quaternary sedimentation of Ganga Plain foreland basin. Proc. Symp. N.W. Himalaya and Foredeep.— Geol. Surv. India Special Publication,21, 161–172, Lucknow

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996b): Geological evolution of Ganga Plain-An overview. —J. Palaeontological Society of India,41, 99–137, Lucknow

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I.B. & Ghosh, D.K. (1992): Interpretation of Late Quaternary geomorphic and tectonic features of Gangetic Plain using remote sensing techniques.—Proceeding National Symposium on Remote Sensing for Sustainable Development, R.S.A.C.-U.P., pp. 273–278, Lucknow

  • —— (1994): Geomorphology and tectonic features of Indo-Gangetic Plain. In: Dikshit, K.R., Kale, V.S. & Kaul, M.N. (1994, eds.): India: Geomorphological Diversity.—270–286, New Delhi (Rawat Publications)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I.B., Rajagopalan, G., Agarwal, K.K., Srivastava, P., Sharma, M. &Sharma, S. (1997): Evidence of Middle to Late Holocene neotectonic activity in the Ganga Plain.— Current Science,73, 1114–1117, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, R. (1995): Sedimentology of Quaternary alluvial deposits of the Gandak-Kosi interfan, North Bihar plains.—J. Geol. Soc. India,46, 521–532, Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.D. &Perez-Arlucea, M. (1994): Fine-grained splay deposition in the avulsion belt of the lower Saskatchewan River, Canada.—J. Sed. Res.,64, 159–168, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S. (1994): Palaeosols in the Churia (Siwalik) Group, West Central Nepal.—In:Kumar, R., Ghosh, S.K. &Phadatare, N.R. (eds.): Siwalik Foreland Basin of India.—181–204, New Delhi (Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, R.S. &Coleman, J.M. (1989a): Depositional processes and stratigraphy of fluvially dominated lacustrine deltas: Mississippi Delta Plain.—J. Sed. Petrol.,59, 973–996, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1989b): Evolution of Atchafalaya lacustrine deltas, South-Central Louisiana.—Sed. Geol.,65, 95–112, Tulsa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, B. (1993): Ancient river systems in the Himalayan foredeep, Chinji village area, Northern Pakistan.—Sed. Geol.,88, 1–76, Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, B.J. &Behrensmeyer, A.K. (1994): Architecture of Miocene overbank deposits in Northern Pakistan.—J. Sed. Res.,64, 60–67, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, I.B., Srivastava, P., Sharma, S. et al. Upland interfluve (Doab) deposition: Alternative model to muddy overbank deposits. Facies 40, 197–210 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02537474

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02537474

Keywords

Navigation