Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of culture filtrate ofTrichoderma viride and barley on lipid metabolism of laying hens

  • Published:
Lipids

Abstract

The suppression of hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase and cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase, previously noted in studies of the influences of barley and the filtrate ofTrichoderma viride culture (CF) on cholesterol metabolism in sexually immature birds, is shown in sexually mature birds. Barley, CF or both were fed in one study from the day of hatching, in another during the period of sexual maturation and, in a third study, CF was fed to mature layers. CF suppressed HMG CoA reductase by 30–50% and cholesterol 7 α-hydroxylase by 32–45% when added to the control diet. In birds fed barley rather than corn, the respective activities were 25–36% and 24–31% lower. These effects were expressed in the lowering of plasma cholesterol by 11–36%. Lipogenic activity based on the assays of 4 enzymes was increased 2–3 times by the treatments and plasma triglyceride elevated by 12–86%. The start of egg production by birds fed CF preceded the controls by 17 days. Birds fed barley trailed controls by 11–14 days. CF countered the barley-conditioned delay. Egg yolk cholesterol concentrations were lowered by both treatments. Eggs produced by hens fed barley were lower in weight; CF increased egg and yolk weights. Tissues from birds fed CF or barley for up to 30 weeks appeared to be normal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qureshi A.A., Burger, W.C., Prentice, N., and Elson, C.E. (1980) J. Nutr. 110, 1473–1478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Qureshi, A.A., Burger, W.C., Elson, C.E., and Benevenga, N.J. (1982) Lipids 17, 924–934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacMasters, M.M. (1962) Cereal Laboratory Methods (M.M. MacMasters, 7th ed.) published by American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goering, H.K., and Van Soest, P.J. (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses. Agricultural Handbook No. 379, ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prentice, N., and Refsguard, J.F. (1978) J Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 36, 196–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prentice, N., Babler, S., and Faber, S. (1980) Cereal Chem. 57, 198–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudel, L.L., and Morris, M.D. (1973) J. Lipid Res. 14, 364–366.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bucher, N.L.R., Overath, P., and Lynen, F. (1960) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 40, 491–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Danielsson, H., Einarsson, K., and Johansson, G. (1967) Eur. J. Biochem. 2, 44–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro, D.J., Norstrom, J.L., Mitchelen, J.J., Rodwell, V.W., and Schimke, R.T. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 370, 369–377.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlson, S.E., Mitchell, A.D., and Goldfarb, S. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 531 115–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Craig, M.C., Nepokroeff, C.M., Lakshmanan, M.R., and Porter, J.W. (1972) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 152, 619–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Inoue, H. Suzuke, F., Fukunishi, K., Adachi, K., and Takeda, Y. (1966) J. Biochem. 60, 543–553.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu, R.H., and Lardy, H.A. (1967) J. Biol. Chem. 245, 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nepokroeff, C.M., Lakshmanan, M.R., and Porter, J.W. (1975) Methods Enzymol. 35, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gornall, A.G., Bardawill, C.J., and David, M.M. (1949) J. Biol. Chem. 177, 751–766.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Snedecor, G.W., and Cochran, W.G. (1971) in Statistical Method, 6th ed., pp. 258–298, The Iowa State University Press Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trowell, H. (1972) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25, 926–932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson, J.W., and Chen, W.J.L. (1979) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32, 346–363.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jenkins, D.J.A., Reynolds, D., Slavin, B., Leeds, A.R., Jenkins, A.L., and Jepson, E.M. (1980) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 33, 575–581.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Balmer, J., and Zilversmit, B.D. (1974) J. Nutr. 104, 1319–1328.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgin, M.J.P., Brady, D., and Rudney, H. (1974) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 163, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qureshi, A.A., Burger, W.C., Din, Z.Z., and Elson, C.E. (1982) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 35, 855 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keshavarz, K. (1976) Poultry Sci. 55, 1077–1083.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Edwards, H.M., Jr., Marion, J.E., and Driggers, J.C. (1962) Poultry Sci. 41, 713–717.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Palafox, A.L. (1968) Poultry Sci. 47, 1705 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dua, P.N., Dilwaorth, B.C., Day, E.J., and Hill, J.E. (1967) Poultry Sci. 46, 530–531.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nockels, C.F. (1973) Poultry Sci. 52, 373–378.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hafez, Y.S.M., and Kratzer, F.H. (1976) Poultry Sci. 55, 923–926.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Turk, D.E., and Barnett, B.D. (1972) Poultry Sci. 51, 1881 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roepke, R.R., and Bushnell, L.D. (1936) J. Immun. 30, 109–113.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vanstone, W.E., Dale, D.G., Oliver, W.F., and Common, R.H. (1957) Can. J. Biochem. 35, 659–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Cooperative investigation between the Science and Education Administration, USDA, and the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Univesity of Wisconsin-Madison. A preliminary report of this work was presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Chicago, IL, April 10–15, 1983.

Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.

About this article

Cite this article

Oureshi, A.A., Prentice, N., Din, Z.Z. et al. Influence of culture filtrate ofTrichoderma viride and barley on lipid metabolism of laying hens. Lipids 19, 250–257 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02534452

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02534452

Keywords

Navigation