Summary
In a recent paper, Petroniet al. claim that a necessary condition for the instability of two-dimensional steady flows is a «double cascade» of energy and enstrophy respectively to larger and to smaller scales of motion. It is shown here that the analytical reasoning employed by Petroniet al. is flawed and that their conclusions are incorrect. What is true is that in any scale interaction (whether an instability or not), neither energy nor enstrophy can be transferred in one spectral direction only, but this result is extremely well known.
Literatur
R. Petroni, S. Pierini andA. Vulpiani,Nuovo Cimento C,10, 27 (1987).
W. M'F. Orr:Proc. R. Ir. Acad. Sect. A.,27, 9 (1907).
B. Farrell:J. Atmos. Sci.:39, 1663 (1982).
T. G. Shepherd:J. Fluid Mech.,183, 467 (1987).
D. D. Holm, J. E. Marsden, T. Ratiu andA. Weinstein:Phys. Rep.,123, 1 (1985).
M. E. McIntyre andT. G. Shepherd:J. Fluid. Mech.,181, 527 (1987).
V. I. Arnold:Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved Matematika,54, No. 5, 3 (1966) (English translation:Am. Math. Soc. Trans., Series 279, 267 (1969).
R. Fjørtoft:Tellus,5 225 (1953).
P. E. Merilees andH. Warn:J. Fluid. Mech.,69, 625 (1975).
J. Pedlosky:Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, 1979), subsect.3 27.
G. F. Carnevale, G. K. Vallis, R. Purini andM. Briscolini:Phys. Fluids,31, 2567 (1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shepherd, T.G. Remarks concerning the double cascade as a necessary mechanism for the instability of steady equivalent-barotropic flows. Il Nuovo Cimento C 11, 439–442 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533136
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533136