Skip to main content
Log in

Response to the hypobetalipoproteinemic agent adamantyloxyphenyl piperidine in hyperlipemic rats

  • Symposium: Hyperlipidemia Presented at the AOCS 67 th Annual Spring Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana
  • Published:
Lipids

Abstract

The hypobetalipoproteinemic activity of U-41, 792 (1-[p-(1-adamantyloxy)-phenyl]-piperidine) is a marked and selective reduction of heparin precipitating lipoproteins (low density plus very low density lipoproteins) in cholesterol-cholic acid induced hypercholesterolemic rats. This activity consists of both a reduction in heparin precipitating lipoproteins (HPL) and an increase in high density lipoproteins that are not precipitated by heparin. The increase in high density lipoproteins is routinely noted by decreases in HPL/cholesterol ratios. The pattern of response following single 100 mg/kg doses of U-41, 792 was determined. After an I.V. dose was administered in a cotton-seed oil emulsion, serum cholesterol levels were reduced, beginning at 8 hr after administration and persisting for 96 hr. Similar results, though delayed somewhat, were obtained after a single oral dose. Activity was accompanied by increases in weight and cholesterol content of livers. After multiple, daily, oral doses, liver weights, total lipids, and cholesterol contents were reduced. Hypobetalipoproteinemic activity was enhanced by prolonged treatments as demonstrated by analyses of serum obtained weekly throughout 7 wk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schurr, P.E., J.R. Schultz, and C.E. Day, in “Atherosclerosis Drug Discovery,” Edited by C.E. Day, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1976, pp. 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Day, C.E., P.E. Schurr, W.E. Heyd, and D. Lednicer, Ibid. in “ pp. 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schurr, P.E., Cancer Res. 29:258 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Block, W.D., K.J. Jarrett, Jr., and J.B. Levine, in “Automation in Analytical Chemistry,” Edited by L.T. Skeggs, Jr., Mediad Inc., New York, NY, 1965, pp. 345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Folch, J., M. Lees, and G.H. Sloane-Stanley, J. Biol. Chem. 226:497 (1957).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Snedecor, G.W., and W.G. Cochran, “Statistical Methods,” Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1969, pp. 258–296.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearson, E.S., and H.O. Hartley, Biometrika 38:112 (1951).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips, W.A., W.W. Stafford, and J. Stuut, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 143:733 (1973).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Day, C.E., B. Barker, and W.W. Stafford, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 49B:501 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Schurr, P.E., Day, C.E. Response to the hypobetalipoproteinemic agent adamantyloxyphenyl piperidine in hyperlipemic rats. Lipids 12, 22–28 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532967

Keywords

Navigation