Abstract
Some properties of the pure, soluble phospholipase D (phosphatidycholine phosphatido hydrolase, EC 3.1.4.4) interactions with phosphatidyl choline (1,2 diacyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphoryl choline) in a system also containing dodecylsulfate and Ca2+ ions were studied. Concentrations of Ca2+ greater than 50 mM were necessary both for activity and adsorption of the enzyme to the “supersubstrate.” Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid caused inhibition of activity, greater than one would expect from its chelating capacity. A nonlinear increase in activity with the increase of enzyme protein was observed, suggesting a subunit aggregation into a higher mol wt protein, catalytically more active. Upon centrifugation of the supersubstrate-enzyme complex at 4.5×105 g·min at 30 C, most of the substrate molecules sedimented regardless of the pH. The reverse was true when centrifugation was done at 1 C. Phospholipase D hydrolyzed phosphatidylcholine molecules present in the supersubstrate at temperatures around 0 C at a rate 1/5 that of a maximal value measured at 30C. The Arrhenius plot was linear in the range from 0 to 30 C, and at that temperature the curve broke with a smaller slope. Activation energy of 9.1 Kcal/mol, below 30 C, was calculated. Adsorption of the enzyme to the sedimentable supersubstrate occurred at pH 8.0, regardless of temperature. At pH 5.6, a considerable portion of phosphatidylcholine was degraded at 30 C, thus minimizing the capacity of the supersubstrate to adsorb the enzyme. Although Mg2+ could replace Ca2+ in the formation of sedimentable supersubstrate, it neither assists in adsorption of the enzyme nor in activation of the phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heller, M., N. Mozes, I. Peri, and E. Maes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 396:397 (1974).
Heller, M., N. Mozes, and E. Maes, in “Methods in Enzymology,” Vol. 35 B, Edited by J.M. Lowenstein, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1975, pp. 226–232.
Strauss, H., Z. Leibovitz-Ben Gershon, and M. Heller, Lipids 11:442 (1976).
Brockerhoff, H., and R.G. Jensen, “Lipolytic Enzymes,” Academic Press, New York, NY, 1974, pp. 282–288.
Aladjem, E., “Partial Purification and Properties of Phospholipase D from Peanut Seeds,” M.Sc. Thesis, Hebrew University, Jersusalem, Israel, 1969, pp. 24–26.
Tzur, R., and B. Shapiro, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 280:290 (1972).
Dawson, R.M.C., and N. Hemington, Biochem. J. 102:76 (1967).
Brockerhoff, H., Bioorg. Chem. 3:176 (1974).
Heller, M., N. Mozes, and I. Peri, Proc. 18th ICBL, Graz. p. 42 (1975).
Folch, J., M. Lees, and G.H. Sloane-Stanley, J. Biol. Chem. 266:497 (1957).
Heller, M., E. Aladjem and B. Shapiro, Bull. Soc. Chim. Biol. 50:1395 (1968).
West, T.S., and A.S. Sykes, Analytical Applications of EDTA, British Drug House Publication, Dorset, England, 1960.
Yabusaki, K.K., and M.A. Wells, Biochemistry 14:162 (1975).
Moskowitz, M., M.W. Deverell, and R. McKinney, Science 123:1077 (1956).
Chapman, D., and D.F.H. Wallach, in “Biological Membranes”, Edited by D. Chapman, Academic Press, London and New York, 1968, pp. 125–202.
Dixon, M., and E.C. Webb, “Enzymes”, 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1964, pp. 150–166.
Netter, H., “Theoretical Biochemistry,” Oliver and Boyd, Edinborough, Scotland, 1969, p. 608.
Ladbrooke, B.D., R.M. Williams, and D. Chapman, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 50:333 (1968).
Ladbrooke, B.D., and D. Chapman, Chem. Phys. Lipids 3:304 (1969).
Philips, M.C., B.D. Ladbrooke, and D. Chapman, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 196:35 (1970).
Chen, J-S., and P.G. Barton, Can. J. Biochem. 49:1362 (1971).
Chen, J-S., “Studies of Dialkyl Ether Phospholipids,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmundton, Alberta, Canada, 1972, pp. 54–58.
Bangham, A.D., Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 18:29 (1968).
Heller, M., and R. Arad, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 210:276 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Heller, M., Mozes, N. & Peri (Abramovitz), I. Interactions of phospholipase D with 1,2 diacyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphorylcholine, dodecylsulfate, and Ca2+ . Lipids 11, 604–609 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532873
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532873