Interaction of calcium ions with lecithin and sphingomyelin monolayers
Dipalmitoyl lecithin and sphingomyelin monolayers have similar limiting areas, whereas their surface potentials are strikingly different. The double bond at the 4–5 position in sphingomyelin acts as an induced dipole in relation to the surface potentials. This was confirmed by the surface potential of hydrogenated sphingomyelin. The binding of calcium to lecithin and sphingomyelin monllayers resulted in an increase in surface potential. This increase was greater for the dipalmitoyl lecithin monolayer as compared to that for sphingomyelin. It is concluded that the binding of calcium ions to springomyelin monolayers is significantly reduced by the presence of the hydroxyl group at the 3-carbon position of the molecule.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Van Deenen, L. L. M., “Progress in the Chemistry of Fats and Ohher Lipids,” edited by R. T. Holman, Vol. VIII, Part 1, Pergamon Press, New York, 1965, p. 24.Google Scholar
- 6.Ansell, G. B., and J. N. Hawthorne, “Phospholipids, B. B. A. Library, Vol. 3, Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1964, p. 424.Google Scholar
- 8.Sears, F. D., and J. H. Schulman J. Phys. Chem.68, 3529–3534 (1964).Google Scholar
- 11.Shah, D. O., and J. H. Schulman, J. Lipid Res., in press.Google Scholar
- 12.Joly, M., in “Recent Progress in Surface Science,” edited by J. F. Danielli, K. G. A. Pankhurst, A. C. Riddiford, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, 1964, p. 38–40.Google Scholar
- 13.Harkins, W. D., “The Physical Chemistry of Surface Films,” Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1954, pp. 140–154.Google Scholar
- 15.Schulman, J. H., and E. K. Rideal, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser.A 130, 284–294 (1931).Google Scholar
- 16.Hughes, A., and E. K. Rideal, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser.A 140, 253–269 (1933).Google Scholar
- 18.Marsden, J., and E. K. Rideal, J. Chem. Soc., 1163–1171 (1938).Google Scholar
- 20.Parriera, H. C., and B. A. Pethica, “Proc. Second. Int. Cong. Surface Activity,” Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, 1957, p. 44–49.Google Scholar
- 23.Davies, J. T., and E. K. Rideal, “Interfacial Phenomena,” Academic Press, New York, 1961, p. 77–78.Google Scholar
- 24.Alexander, A. E., and J. H. Schulman, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser.A 161, 115–127 (1937).Google Scholar