Abstract
The North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) provides horizontal coordinates for more than 250,000 geodetic stations. These coordinates were derived by a least squares adjustment of existing terrestrial and space-based geodetic data. For pairs of first order stations with interstation distances between 10km and 100km, therms discrepancy between distances derived fromNAD 83 coordinates and distances derived from independentGPS data may be suitably approximated by the empirical rulee=0.008 K0.7 where e denotes therms discrepancy in meters and K denotes interstation distance in kilometers. For the same station pairs, therms discrepancy in azimuth may be approximated by the empirical rule e=0.020 K0.5. Similar formulas characterize therms discrepancies for pairs involving second and third order stations. Distance and orientation accuracies, moreover, are well within adopted standards. While these expressions indicate that the magnitudes of relative positional accuracies depend on station order, absolute positional accuracies are similar in magnitude for first, second, and third order stations. Adjustment residuals reveal a few local problems with theNAD 83 coordinates and with the weights assigned to certain classes of observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bureau International de I' Heure (BIH): Annual Report for 1984. Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France, 1985.
W.E. CARTER, J.E. PETTY, and W.E. STRANGE: The accuracy of astronomic azimuth determinations. Bulletin Géodésique, 52, pp. 107–113, 1978.
B.H. CHOVITZ: Datum definition. In “North American Datum of 1983,” NOAA Professional Paper, NOS 2, National Geodetic Information Branch, NOAA, Rockville, MD, 1989
Federal Geodetic Control Committee: Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control Networks. National Geodetic Information Branch, NOAA, Rockville, MD, 1984.
S.D. HORN, R.A. HORN, and D.B. DUNCAN: Estimating heteroscedastic variances in linear models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, pp. 380–385, 1975.
D.G. MILBERT: A note on observation decorrelation, variances of residuals, and redundancy numbers. Bulletin Géodésique, 59, pp. 71–80, 1985.
National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering; North American Datum U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1971.
R. ROELOFS: Astronomy Applied to Land Surveying. Amsterdam, 110, 1950.
L.G. SIMMONS: How accurate is first-order triangulation? The Journal, Coast and Geodetic Survey. National Geodetic Information Branch, Rockville, MD, pp. 53–56, 1950.
R.A. SNAY: Horizontal deformation in New York and Connecticut:examining contradictory results from the geodetic evidence. J. Geophys. Res., 91, pp. 12695–12702, 1986.
R.A. SNAY: Accuracy analysis. In “North American Datum of 1983,” NOAA Professional Paper, NOS 2, National Geodetic Information Branch, NOAA, Rockville, MD, 1989.
R.A. SNAY, M.W. CLINE, and E,L. TIMMERMAN: Project REDEAM. Models for historical horizontal deformation. NOAA Tech. Rep., NOS 125 NGS 42, National Geodetic Information Branch, NOAA, Rockville, MD, 76 p., 1987.
E.B. WADE: Project execution. In “North American Datum of 1983,” NOAA Professional Paper, NOS 2, National Geodetic Information Branch, NOAA, Rockville, MD, 1989.
M.D. ZOBACK, W.H, PRESCOTT, and S.W. KRUEGER: Evidence for lower crustal ductile strain localization in southern New York. Nature, 317, pp. 705–707, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snay, R.A. Accuracy analysis for the NAD 83 geodetic reference system. Bull. Geodesique 64, 1–27 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530613
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530613