Skip to main content
Log in

Morphology and the classification of the so-called Cladocera

  • Taxonomy & Systematics
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The validity as a monophyletic taxon of the group of branchiopod crustaceans long regarded as constituting the Cladocera is questioned. This seems in fact to be a heterogeneous assemblage whose members probably merit assignment to four separate orders. The Onychopoda and Haplopoda (the so-called Gymnomera) clearly stand apart from the Ctenopoda and Anomopoda (the so-called Calyptomera) and differ in important respects from each other. While sharing several characters, some doubtless indicative of distant ancestral similarities, others probably convergent, the Ctenopoda and Anomopoda differ in many respects, have clearly evolved along different lines, and are probably much less closely related than is generally assumed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binder, G., 1932. Das Muskelsystem vonDaphnia. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 26: 54–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S. T., J. Hanson, P. Dowling & M. C. Poon, 1966. The genetics ofArtemia salina. VI. Summary of mutations. Biol. Bull. 131(2): 230–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calman, W. T., 1909. A Treatise on Zoology. Part VII. Apendiculara. Third Fasc.Crustacea. Adam and Charles Black, London, 346 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, H. G., 1933. On the feeding mechanism of the Branchiopoda. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. Lond. (B) 222: 267–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl., E., 1983. Alternatives in malacostracan evolution. Mem. Aust. Mus. 18: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, E., 1983a. Phylogenetic systematics and the Crustacea Malacostraca — a problem of prerequisites. Verh. naturw. Ver. Hamb. (NF) 25: 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, S., 1934. Studien über die Fangapparate der Branchiopoden nebst einigen phylogenetischen Bemerkungen. Zool. Bidr. Upps. 15: 23–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flössner, D., 1972. Krebstiere, Crustacea. Kiemen- und Blattfüsser, Brachiopoda, Fischläuse, Branchiura. Tierwelt Dtl. 60: 1–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1963. The functional morphology and feeding mechanism of the chydorid cladoceranEurycercus lamellatus (O. F. Müller). Trans. r. Soc. Edinb. 65: 335–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1968. Evolution and adaptive radiation in the Chydoridae (Crustacea: Cladocera): a study in comparative functional morphology and ecology. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. (B) 254: 221–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1974. Evolution and adaptive radiation in the Macrothricidae (Crustacea: Cladocera): a study in comparative functional morphology and ecology. Phil. Trans. r. Soc., Lond. (B) 269: 137–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G., 1985. Structure and habits of living branchiopod crustaceans and their bearing on the interpretation of fossil forms. Trans. r. Soc. Edinb. 76: 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydon, C. von, 1862. Gliederthiere aus der Braunkohle des Niederrhein's, der Wetterau und der Röhn. Palaeontographica 10: 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, H. E., 1955. On the structure, function and distribution of the prolegs of the Panorpoidea with a criticism of the Berless-Imms theory. Trans. r. ent. Soc. Lond. 106: 455–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largaiolli, V., 1906. Über das Vorkommen von Doppelaugen bei einer limnetischen Daphnie. Zool. Anz. 29: 701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Largaiolli, V., 1906a.Diaphanosoma brachyurum Liev. var.tridentinum mihi. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1: 428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löpmann, A., 1937. Die Zweiäugigkeit vonDiaphanosoma. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 34: 432–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makrushin, A. V., 1985. Peculiarities of reproductive system in Polyphemoidea,Penilia avirostris, and Moinidae (Crustacea, Cladocera) related to the loss of yolk by subitanic eggs. Zool. Zh. 64: 769–772. (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, K. G., K. J. Müller & M. N. Gramm, 1983. Phylogeny of Ostracoda. In F. R. Schram (ed.) Crustacean Phylogeny. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordukhai-Boltovskoi, Ph. D., 1968. On the taxonomy of the Polyphemidae. Crustaceana 14: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, R. A., 1977. Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry in owls and implications on owl taxonomy. Phil. Trans. r. Soc. Lond. (B) 280: 375–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odselius, R. & D. E. Nilsson, 1983. Regionally different ommatidial structure in the compound eye of the water-fleaPolyphemus (Cladocera, Crustacea). Proc. r. Soc. Lond. (B) 217: 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, G., 1957. Die Musculatur der Gliedmaszen von Phylopoden und Anostraken. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berlin 33: 221–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, H. K., 1981. Adaptation of Bathynellacea (Crustacea, Syncarida) to life in the interstitial (‘Zoea Theory’). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 66: 575–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1904. Studier over de Danske Søers Plankton. Specielle del. 1. Texst. Gyldendal, København. 223 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingstrand, K. G., 1978. Comparative spermatology of the Crustacea Entomostraca 1. Subclass Branchiopoda. Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 22: 66 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fryer, G. Morphology and the classification of the so-called Cladocera. Hydrobiologia 145, 19–28 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530261

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02530261

Keywords

Navigation