Understanding utero-placental blood flow in normal and hypertensive pregnancy through a mathematical model

  • A. Sengupta
  • P. Biswas
  • G. Jayaraman
  • S. K. Guha
Article

Abstract

Normal development of utero-placental circulation is crucial not only for the survival and growth of the fetus in utero, but also for maternal well-being. Any disturbance or abnormality may reflect underlying pathology. Geometric conversion of a pre-pregnant spiral vessel into a divergent low-resistance vessel is believed to be responsible for the increased utero-placental blood flow in normal pregnancy. Known biomedical investigative techniques have failed to explain many such underlying haemodynamic changes taking place in the utero-placental system. Therefore, proper understanding of the system using a mathematical model has been found to be useful. The physiological fluid dynamic study is the first in this branch of physiology. Abnormal pressure gradient, axial velocity, volume flow and shear rate are obtained for various slowly changing geometries such as, tapering, divergence, local constrictions and sinusoidal tube for low Womersley parameters. The model can explain many enhanced patho-physiological changes, such as persistence or the appearance of local constriction in the utero-placental vessels. Such pathological changes are considered to be responsible for very high utero-placental resistance, leading to blood flow insufficiency in pre-eclampsia or intra-uterine growth retardations. It is believed that these changes may be caused by low shear rate on the pre-existing deranged or abnormal endothelium. Furthermore, this derangement is caused by an abnormal proliferation of either spiral vessels or the invading non-villous trophoblasts. Doppler flow study can explain and validate some of the theoretically derived flow velocity results. The study opens up a new area of research into utero-placental physiological fluid dynamics.

Keywords

Haemodynamics Model Pre-eclampsia Pregnancy Utero-placental blood flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson, S. L. (1992): ‘Factors determining blood flow pulsatility,’Ultrasound Med. Biol. 18, (3), pp. 255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brosen, I. A. (1977): ‘Morphological changes in the uteroplacental bed,’Clinics Obs. Gyn 4, pp. 573–93Google Scholar
  3. Brosen, I., Dixon, H. G., andRobertson, W. B. (1977): ‘Fetal growth retardation and the arteries of the placental bed,’Br. J. Obs. Gyne 84, p. 656Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, S., Diaz-Recasens, J., andGriffin, D. R. (1983): ‘New Doppler technique for assessing uteroplacental blood flow,’Lancet,ii, (1), pp. 675–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, S., Pearce, J. M. F., Hackett, G., Cohen-Overbeek, T., andHernandz, C. (1986): ‘Qualitative assessment of uteroplacental blood flow: early screening for high risk pregnancies,’Obs. Gyn,68, pp. 649–653Google Scholar
  6. Caro, C. G., Pedley, T. J., Schroter, R. C. I., andSeed, W. A. (1978): ‘In the mechanics of the circulation,’ (Oxford University Press, oxford)Google Scholar
  7. Cavanaugh, D., andRao, P. S. (1985): ‘Pregnancy induced hypertension,’Am. J. Obs. Gyn. 151, (7), p. 990Google Scholar
  8. Cohen-Overbeek, T. (1985): ‘The antenatal assessment of uteroplacental and feto-placental blood flow using Doppler ultrasound,’Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2, pp. 329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayashi, T. T., andDorko, M. E. (1988): ‘A rat model for the study of IUGR,’Am. J. Obs. Gyn. 158, p. 1203Google Scholar
  10. Helmilinger, G., Geiger, R. V., Schreck, S. andNarem, R. M. (1991): ‘Effects of pulsatile flow on cultured vascular endothelial cell morphology,’J. Biomech. Eng.,113, pp. 123–131Google Scholar
  11. Milnor, W. R. (1989): ‘Pulsatile pressure and flow,’in ‘Haemodynamics,’ (Williams & Wilkins, USA), pp. 102–141Google Scholar
  12. Rao, A. R. (1983): ‘Oscillatory flow in an elastic tube of variable cross-section,’Acta Mechanica,46, pp. 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richard, A. M., Moodley, J., Graham, D. I., andBullock, R. R. (1986): ‘Active management of the unconscious eclamptic patients,’Br. J. Obs. Gyn. 93, pp. 554–562Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, J. M., andRedman, C. W. G. (1993): ‘Pre-eclampsia: more than pregnancy induced hypertension,’Lancet,341, p. 1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sengupta, A., Muralidharan, S., Bhattacharya, A., andGode, A. G. (1992): ‘Intensive management of eclamptic patients—an overview,’in ‘Recent advances in pathophysiology of pregnancy (Proc. XIX congress)’Dasagupta, S. Parvez, H., andRippman, E. P. (Eds.): (Org. Gestosis-Basel, CIC, Rome)Google Scholar
  16. Sengupta, A., andGuha, S. K. (1994): ‘The multifactorial interactions in the aetiopathogenesis of EPH-gestosis-A hypothesis,’Med. Hypothesis 43, (5), pp. 322–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sengupta, A., Guha, S. K., Anand, S., Jayaraman, G., Biswas, P., andRehana, H. M. S. (1995): ‘Can conventional investigative technology unfold the complexities of uteroplacental system in pregnancy? A critical study’.Proc. Int. RC-IEEE-EMBS & BMES, New Delhi, India Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Sengupta
    • 1
  • P. Biswas
    • 1
  • G. Jayaraman
    • 2
  • S. K. Guha
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of TechnologyDelhi and All India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Atmospheric SciencesIndian Institute of TechnologyDelhi, New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations