Skip to main content
Log in

Food utilization of aphidophagous hoverfly larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae, Chamaemyiidae) on herbaceous plants in an urban habitat

  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

We examined food utilization in a community of aphidophagous hoverfly larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae and Chamaemyiidae) in open lands in an urban habitat in central Japan for 3 years. The community consisted of 17 hoverfly species feeding on 20 aphid species occurring on 14 species of dominant herbaceous plants. In terms of larval prey preference, the dominant eight species of hoverfly were categorized into three groups: a polyphagous ‘generalist’ group consisting of four species,Episyrphus balteatus, Betasyrphus serarius, Syrphus vitripennis andSphaerophoria sp.; an oligophagous ‘specialist’ group consisting of three species,Metasyrphus hakiensis, Dideoides latus andParagus hemorrhous; andLeucopis puncticornis, which showed a preference for two aphid species on the plantTorilis scabra. The prey aphids of the second group have behavioral or morphological defense mechanisms that are effective for preventing attacks by generalist hoverflies; two prey aphids are aggressive toward generalist predators and the others are protected by ant-attendance. The specialist hoverflies seem to be adapted to overcome these defense mechanisms. The prey ranges overlapped little between the generalist and the specialist groups, while those within the generalist group overlapped greatly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoki S. (1984) First instar larvae of the sugar-cane woolly aphid,Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), attack its predators.Kontyû 52: 458–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakaki N. (1989) Alarm pheromone eliciting attack and escape responses in the sugar woolly aphid,Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera, Pemphigidae).Journal of Ethology 7: 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakaki N. (1990) Colony defense by the first nymphs and two functions of alarm pheromone in the sugar cane woolly aphid,Ceratovacuna lanigera.Insectarium 27: 76–81 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakaki N. (1992) Predators of the sugar cane woolly aphid,Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Okinawa and predator avoidance of defensive attack by the aphid.Applied Entomology and Zoology 27: 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovbjerg R. V. (1970) Ecological isolation and competitive exclusion in two crayfish (Orconectes vivilis andOrconectes immunis).Ecology 51: 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H. (1976) Community structure; a neutral model analysis.Ecological Monograph 46: 327–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell J. H. (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiment.American Naturalist 122: 661–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J. M. (1973) Distributional ecology of New Guinea birds.Science 179: 759–769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. S. (1985a) Morphometric patterns in hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 224: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. S. (1985b) Ecomorphological relationships in hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 224: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. S., Harding E. F., Line J. M. &Perry I. (1985) Morphological approaches to community structure in hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae).Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 224: 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. S. &Owen J. (1985) Diurnal activity patterns in hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae).Ecological Entomology 10: 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F. S. &Owen J. (1990) Size, shape, competition, and community structure in hoverflies (Diptera; Syrphidae).Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hespenhide H. A. (1973) Ecological inferences from morphological data.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itioka T. &Inoue T. (1996a) The consequences of ant-attendance to the biological control of the red wax scale insectCeroplastes rubens byAnicetus beneficus.Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 609–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itioka T. &Inoue T. (1996b) Density-dependent ant attendance and its effects on the parasitism of a honeydew-producing scale insect,Ceroplastes rubens.Oecologia 106: 448–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itioka T. &Inoue T. (1996c) The role of predators and attendant ants in the regulation and persistence of a population of the citrus mealybugPseudococcus citriculus in a Satsuma orange orchard.Applied Entomology and Zoology 31: 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô Y. (1989) The evolutionary biology of sterile soldiers in aphids.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurosu U. &Aoki S. (1988) First-instar aphids produced late by the fundatrix ofCeratovacuna nekoashi (Homoptera) defend their closed gall outside.Journal of Ethology 6: 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R. H. (1960) On the relative abundance of species.American Naturalist 94: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ninomiya E. (1957) On the food-habits of some aphidophagous syrphid larvae II.Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 1: 186–192 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninomiya E. (1968) Predation among aphidophagous insect larvae.Annual Report of Natural Science, Faculty of Education, Nagasaki University 19: 79–84 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ôhara K. (1985) Observations on the oviposition behaviour ofMetasyrphus confrater (Diptera, Syrphidae) and the defensive behaviour of soldiers ofPseudoregma bambucicola (Homoptera, Pemphigidae).Esakia 23: 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen J. &Gilbert F. S. (1989) On the abundance of hoverflies (Syrphidae).Oikos 55: 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotheray G. E. &Gilbert F. S. (1989) The phylogeny and systematics of the tribe Syrphinae (Diptera, Syrphidae) according to larval morphology.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 27–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1990)SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 6, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F. (1969) Bionomics and physiology of aphidophagous syrphidae.Annual Review of Entomology 14: 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T. E. (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities.Science 185: 27–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener T. E. (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition.American Naturalist 122: 240–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong D. R. (1983) Natural variability and manifold mechanisms of ecological communities.American Naturalist 122: 636–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatematsu Y. (1993) Interspecific competition and community structure in aphidophagous syrphidae larvae (Diptera; Syrphidae and Chamaemyiidae). Master of Agricultural Science thesis, Nagoya University, Nagoya (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl W. (1992) Aphids or their parasitoids: who actually benefits from ant-attendance?Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völkl W. (1994) The effect of ant-attendance on the foraging behaviour of the aphid parasitoidLysiphlebus cardui.Oikos 70: 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Mizuno, M., Itioka, T., Tatematsu, Y. et al. Food utilization of aphidophagous hoverfly larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae, Chamaemyiidae) on herbaceous plants in an urban habitat. Ecol. Res. 12, 239–248 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02529453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02529453

Key words

Navigation