Zusammenfassung
Der vorliegende Beitrag bildet den 5. Teil einer Veröffentlichungsserie, die die Ergebnisse einer Arbeitsgruppe der DGSS zur Qualitätsprüfung und Qualitätssicherung in der psychologischen Diagnostik chronischen Schmerzes vorstellt. Er konzentriert sich auf deutschsprachige Verfahren zur Erfassung von Schmerzkognitionen und Schmerzbewältigung. Jedes Instrument ist hinsichtlich standardmäßiger Testgütekriterien, empirischer Fundierung und klinischer Relevanz geprüft worden. Darauf aufbauend erfolgt für den jeweiligen Diagnostikbereich eine spezifische und differenzierte Empfehlung.
Abstract
The present paper is one of a series of publications, reviewing German instruments for psychological assessment of pain. Their main focus is on the results of a task force on quality testing for each subject. This paper describes and comments on methods regarding self-reporting of pain cognitions and both cognitive and behavioral strategies for coping with pain. Concerning pain cognitions one focus is on patients' attributions of causes of pain and the modes of controlling pain (subjective pain model). The other focus is on instruments recording “pain beliefs” in the sense of dysfunctional congitions associated with the experience of pain. Each instrument was examined with reference to approved psychometric criteria, empirical foundation and clinical relevance. It was noted that several instruments are deficient in their psychometric criteria and their empirical foundations. We used these data as a basis to elaborate a specific and differential recommendation. A similar procedure was followed with instruments for the assessment of pain-related coping strategies. According to our research there are two subgroups of coping instruments, one more specifically for cognitive coping with pain, and the other combined with behavioral coping strategies. Once again, we elaborated a specific and differential recommendation, giving priority to instruments taking account of both cognitive and behavioral dimensions of coping with pain.
Literatur
Birbaumer N (1984) Psychologische Analyse und Behandlung von Schmerzzuständen. In: Zimmermann M, Handwerker HO (Hrsg) Schmerz—Konzepte und ärztliches Handeln. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 124
Flor H (1991) Psychobiologie des Schmerzes. Huber, Bern
Flor H, Behle DJ, Birbaumer N (1993) Assessment of pain-related cognitions in chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther 31: 63
Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Henson CD (1994) The Coping Strategies Questionnaire and chronic pain adjustment: a conceptual and empirical reanalysis. Clin J Pain 10: 98
Gerber WD, Haag W (1982) Migräne. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Gottlieb BS (1984) Development of the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: a preliminary report. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy Convention, Philadelphia
Hasenbring M (1994) Kieler Schmerz-Verarbeitungs-Inventar (KSI). Huber, Bern
Herda CA, Siegeris K, Basler H-D (1994) The Pain Beliefs and Perception Inventory: further evidence for a 4-factor structure. Pain 57: 85
Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Karoly P (1991) Coping with chronic pain: a critical review of the literature. Pain 47: 249
Klingler OJ, Morawetz RF (1993) Die Schmerz-Verarbeitungs-Skalen (SVS)—Konstruktion und Validierung eines Verfahrens zur Erfassung zweier Faktoren der Schmerzbewältigung. Z Diff Diag Psychol 14: 75
Kröner-Herwig B, Greis R, Schilkowsky G (1993) Kausal- und Kontrollattribution bei chronischen Schmerzpatienten. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Inventars (KAUKON). Diagnostica 39: 120
Kröner-Herwig B, Jäkle C, Basler H-D, Peters K, Seemann H, Franz C, Frattlöh J (1993) Der Stellenwert von Bewältigungsstrategien in der Therapie chronischer Schmerzpatienten. Der Schmerz 7 [Suppl 1]: 50
Kröner-Herwig B, Jäkle C, Peters K, Seemann H, Basler H-D, Franz C, Frettlöh J (in press) Predicting subjective disability in chronic pain patients. A multiple regression analysis. Pain
Lazarus RS, Launier R (1978) Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In: Pervon LA, Lewis M (eds) Internal and external deteminants of behavior. Plenum Press. New York
Lohaus A, Schmitt GM (1989) Frage-bogen zur Erhebung von Kontrollüber-zeugungen zu Krankheit und Gesundheit (KKG). Hogrefe, Göttingen
Luka-Krausgrill U, Wurmthaler C, Becker T (1994) Die Beziehung zwischen Schmerzbewältigung, Beeinträchtigung und Depression bei chronischem Schmerz. In: Wahl R, Hautzinger M (Hrsg) Psychotherapeutische Medizin bei chronischem Schmerz. Deutscher Ärzte Verlag, Köln, S175
Main CJ, Waddell G (1987) Psychometric construction and validity of the Pilowski Illness Behavior Questionnaire in British patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 28: 11
Main CJ, Waddell G (1991) A comparison of cognitive measures in low back pain: statistical structure and clinical validity at initial assessment. Pain 46: 287
Pilowsky I, Bassett D, Barrett R, Petrovic L, Minitti R (1983) The Illness Behavior Schedule: reliability and validity. Int J Psychiatry 13: 11
Rosenstiel A, Keefe Fj (1983) The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain 17: 33
Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M (1983) Pain and behavioral medicine. The Guilford Press, New York
Turk DC, Rudy TE (1992) Cognitiv factors and persistant pain: a glimpse into Pandora's box. Cogn Ther Res 16: 99
Wichmann E, Nilges P, Gerbershagen HU, Gamber J, Scheifling I (1990) The illness behavior questionnaire, psychometric properties and validity of a german version. Pain [Suppl 5] 41: 336
Williams DA, Thorn BE (1989) An empirical assessment of pain beliefs. Pain 36: 351
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Denecke, H., Klinger, R., Kröner-Herwig, B. et al. Qualitätssicherung in der Therapie chronischen Schmerzes. Schmerz 9, 206–211 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02528162
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02528162
Key words
- Multidimensional psychological assessment of pain
- Pain cognition
- Coping
- Quality assurance
- Recommendations