Abstract
In support of requirements for the U.S. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, gravity anomalies have been upward continued to several elevations in different areas of the United States. One area was 340 to 400 N in latitude and 960 to 1030 W in longitude, generally called the Oklahoma area. The computations proceeded from 26, 032 point anomalies to the prediction of mean anomalies in 14, 704, 2.5′×2.5′ blocks and 9,284, 5′×5′ blocks. These anomalies were upward continued along 28 profiles at 5′ intervals for every 30′ in latitude and longitude. These anomalies at elevations were meaned in various patterns to form mean 30′×30″, 10×10, 50×50 blocks. Comparisons were then made to the corresponding ground values. The results of these comparisons lead to practical recommendations on the arrangement of flight profiles in airborne gravimetry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. MORITZ: Studies on the Accuracy of the Computations of Gravity in High Elevations, Institute of Geodesy Report No. 21, OSU, 1962.
H. MORITZ: Practical Computations of Gravity at High Altitude (with R.A. Hirvonen), Institute of Geodesy Report No. 27, OSU, 1962.
R.H. RAPP: The Prediction of Point and Mean Gravity Anomalies Through the Use of a Digital Computer, Institute of Geodesy Report No. 43, OSU, 1964.
R.H. RAPP: Results From Least-Squares Prediction of Point and Mean Anomalies, Presented at the 45th Annual AGU Meeting, April, 1964.
R.H. RAPP: A Fortran Program For the Upward Continuation of Gravity Anomalies, Department of Geodetic Science Report No. 62, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rapp, R.H. Comparison of mean gravity anomalies at elevation with corresponding ground anomalies. Bull. Geodesique 83, 55–65 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02526107
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02526107