Skip to main content
Log in

Degree variances of the Earth's potential, topography and its isostatic compensation

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A spherical harmonic expansion of the earth's gravitational potential and equivalent rock topography to degree and order 180 is described. The potential implied by the topography considered as uncompensated and with isostatic compensation has been computed. Good agreement with the observed potential field is found when the depth of compensation in the Airy theory is assumed to be 50 km. At the higher degrees the correlation coefficient between the potential expansion and the equivalent rock topography is about 0.5.

The Lachapelle equations for the topographic isostatic potential were tested using 1ox1o equivalent rock topography. The degree variances agree at the lower degrees but at degree 36 the Lachapelle results using 5o data underestimate the potential degree variances by about one-third.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • K. ARNOLD: “The Isostatic Potential Including Second Order Terms.” Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik. Leipzig 89, 289–293, 1980a.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. ARNOLD: “Determination of the Global Isostatic Overcompensation from Gravity Measurements Including Second Order Terms.” Gerlands Beitr. Geophysik. Leipzig 89, 383–388, 1980b.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. BALMINO, K. LAMBECK and W. KAULA: “A Spherical Harmonic Analysis of the Earth's Topography.” J. Geophys. Res. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 478–521, Jan. 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. COLOMBO: “Numerical Methods for Harmonic Analysis on the Sphere.” Dept. of Geodetic Science Report No. 310, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. HAMILTON:Statistics in Physical Science. The Ronald Press, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. HEISKANEN and H. MORITZ:Physical Geodesy. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. LACHAPELLE: “A Spherical Harmonic Expansion of the Isostatic Reduction Potential.” presented at the 6th Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Sienna, Italy, 1975. (Bull. Geod. e Sci. aff. 35, pp. 281–299, 1976).

  • K. LAMBECK: “Methods and geophysical applications of satellite geodesy.”Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 42, pp. 547–628, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. MORITZ:Advanced Physical Geodesy. Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, U.K. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.P. PELLINEN: “Effects of the Earth Ellipticity on Solving Geodetic Boundary Value Problems.” paper presented to the VIII International Hotine Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Como, Italy, Sept. 1981.

  • R. PHILLIPS and K. LAMBECK: “Gravity Fields of the Terrestrial Planets: Long-Wavelength Anomalies and Tectonics.” Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 27–76, February 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. RAPP: “The Earth's Gravity Field to Degree and Order 180 Using Seasat Altimeter Data, Terrestrial Gravity Data, and Other Data.” Dept. of Geodetic Science Report No. 322, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, Dec. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.C. TSCHERNING: “Gravity prediction using collocation and taking known density anomalies into account.” Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc., 59, pp. 147–153, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rapp, R.H. Degree variances of the Earth's potential, topography and its isostatic compensation. Bull. Geodesique 56, 84–94 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02525594

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02525594

Keywords

Navigation