Skip to main content
Log in

Ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Less than two decades ago, early discharge of mastectomy patients was found to be possible while the drains were still in place, without noticeable consequences for patients. Most reported studies focused on surgical complication rates and found no significant evidence of it. The objective of the present study was to compare inpatient to same-day discharge surgery for breast cancer, on unselected patients.

Methods

All interviewed patients (n=90) had routine level I and II axillary lymph node dissection under general anesthesia, combined with breast surgery for most of them. The outpatient group comprised 55 patients and the inpatient group 35. Psychological distress was assessed, as well as pain, anxiety, quality of life, emotional adjustment, recovery, social relations, stressful life events, and so on.

Results

The sociodemographic characteristics of both surgery groups was quite similar, except that time from surgery to interview was about 1 year longer for inpatients. Outpatients and hospitalized patients report similar levels of pain, fear, anxiety, health assessment, and quality of life. Ambulatory patients manifest a significantly better emotional adjustment and fewer psychological distress symptoms. Inpatients reported that it took an average of 27 days to feel that they had recovered from surgery, about 10 days longer than outpatients. Inpatient return to usual activities was also about 11 days later.

Conclusions

Same-day discharge patients are not at a disadvantage compared to hospitalized patients; i.e., they report faster recovery and better psychological adjustment. Outpatient surgery may thus foster patient emotional well-being better than routine hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aston G. Opposition to outpatient mastectomy mounts.Am Med News 1997;140:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg KB, Goldberg P. President, Congress decry practice of “drive-through mastectomy.”Cancer Lett 1997;23:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tarazi R, Esselstyn CB, Kuivila T, Hardesta I. Early hospital discharge following mastectomy.Am Surg 1984;51:579–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark JA, Kent RB. One-day hospitalization following modified radical mastectomy.Am Surg 1992;58:239–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boman L, Bjorvell H, Cedermark B, Theve NO, Wilking N. Effects of early discharge from hospital after surgery for primary breast cancer,Eur J Surg 1993;159:67–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman AA, Mendez AL. Definitive surgery for breast cancer performed on an outpatient basis.Arch Surg 1993;128:1149–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McManus SA, Topf DA, Hopkins C. Advantages of outpatient breast surgery.Am Surg 1994;60:967–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen SH, Douville LM, Eberlein TJ. Accelerated surgical stay program: a mechanism to reduce health care costs.Ann Surg 1994;219:374–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kambouris A. Physical, psychological and economic advantages of accelerated discharge after surgical treatment for breast cancer.Am Surg 1996;62:123–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoehn JL. Definitive breast cancer surgery as an outpatient: a rational basis for the transition,Semin Surg Oncol 1996;12:53–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Warren JL, Riley GF, Potosky AL, Klabunde CN, Richter E, Ballard-Barbash R. Trends and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in elderly women.J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:833–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Margolese R, Poisson R, Shibata H, et al. The technique of segmental mastectomy (lumpectomy) and axillary dissection: a syllabus from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project work-shops,Cancer 1987;102:828–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dohrenwend BP, Shrout PE, Egri G, Mendelsohn FS. Measures of nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology in the general population.Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:1229–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ilfeld FW. Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population,Psychol Rep 1976;39:1215–28.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Préville M, Boyer R, Potvin L, Perrault C, Légaré G.La Détresse Psychologique. Détermination de la Fiabilité et de la Validité de la Mesure Utilisée dans l’enquête Santé-Québec. Montréal: La Direction des Communications Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boyer R, Préville M, Légaré G, Valois P. La détresse psychologique dans la population du Québec non institutionnalisée: résultats normatifs de l’enquête Santé-Québec,Rev Can Psychiatry 1993;38:339–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.Pain 1975;1:277–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ware JEJ. Measuring functioning, well-being, and other generic health concepts. In: Osoba D, ed.Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991:7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levasseur M,Sources et Justifications des questions utilisées dans l’enquête Santé-Québec. Montréal: Gouvernement du Québec-Ministère de la Santé et les Services Sociaux, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale.J Psychosom Res 1967;11:213–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sales E, Schulz R, Biegel D. Predictors of strain in families of cancer patients: a review of the literature.J. Psychosoc Oncol 1992;10:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersen BL, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R. A biobehavioral model of cancer stress and disease course.Am Psychol 1994;49: 389–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L. Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: assessment of potential risk factors.Cancer 1992;70:120–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, Pierce GR. A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications.J Soc Personal Rel 1987;4:497–510.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard G. Margolese MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Margolese, R.G., Lasry, JC.M. Ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology 7, 181–187 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523651

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523651

Key Words

Navigation