Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 571–589 | Cite as

Nonlinear map inversion via state observers

  • S. Nicosia
  • A. Tornambè
  • P. Valigi


This paper deals with the problem of the inversion of nonlinear maps. The first contribution of the paper is the formal definition of some problems, already present in the literature, related to the inversion of nonlinear maps. The main contribution of the paper gives a unified solution to those problems, based on the use of observers for the state estimation of a nonlinear time-varying dynamical system associated with the given map. The proposed observer turns out to be an extension of well-known iterative methods for the solutions of nonlinear equations, such as the Newton and the gradient method.


Time Derivative Parameter Family State Observer Technical Lemma Error Dynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A. Balestrino, G. De Maria, and L. Sciavicco, Robust control of robotic manipulators, InPreprints of the 9th IFAC World Congress, 6, pp. 80–85, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. T. Chung and J. W. Grizzle, Observer error linearization for sampled-data systems, InProc. of the 28th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp.90–95, Tampa, FL, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. J. Craig,Introduction to Robotics, Mechanics and Control, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. T. Glad, Observability and nonlinear deadbeat observers, InProc. of the IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 800–802, San Antonio, TX, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. W. Grizzle and P. E. Moraal, On observers for smooth nonlinear digital systems, In A. Bensoussan and J. L. Lions, editors,Proc. of the 9th International Conference Analysis and Optimization of Systems, pp. 401–410, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. R Kuo, D. L. Elliott, and Tarn, T. J., Exponential observers for nonlinear dynamics systems,Inform. Cont., 29:204–216, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Nicosia, A. Tornambè, and P. Valigi, A solution to the generalized problem of nonlinear map inversion,Systems & Control Letters,17(5):383–394, 1991.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Nicosia, A. Tornambè, and P. Valigi, Use of observer for the inversion of nonlinear maps,Systems & Control Letters, 16(6):447–455, 1991.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. P. Paul,Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming and Control, Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. Sciavicco and B. Siciliano, A solution algorithm to the inverse kinematic problem for redundant manipulators,IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 4(4):403–410, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Tornambè, An asymptotic observer for solving the inverse kinematic problem, InProc. 1990 American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Tornambè, Use of high-gain observers in the inverse kinematic problem,Applied Mathematical Letters, 3(1):97–100, 1990.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    W. A. Wolovich and H. Elliott, A computational technique for inverse kinematics, InProc. 23th Int. Conf. on Decision and Control, pp.1359–1363, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Nicosia
    • 1
  • A. Tornambè
    • 1
  • P. Valigi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria ElettronicaUniversità di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations