Determination of total body water by multifrequency bio-electric impedance: development of several models
- 121 Downloads
Multifrequency bio-electronic impedance analysis (MF BIA) measurements are taken from a heterogeneous group of patients, varying in size between obese and slim. The measuring system uses four electrodes: two current and two potential electrodes. Three new models are developed to calculate total body water (TBW) from the BIA data, and the resulting TBW values are compared with TBW determined by D2O dilution. The results demonstrate that the most simple model provides the best TBW values. For individual patients, TBW can be determined by means of bioimpedance measurement with an accuracy of 3 litres. In the most simple model (model 1), the body is electrically represented by a cylinder, and corrections are made for the amount of fat. This is an extension of the model used by Xitron. In the more advanced models (2 and 3), the body is represented by a cylinder for the trunk, and truncated cones represent the arms and legs. In model 2, ΔTBW amounts to 3 litres. It is shown that the resistance of the trunk is proportional to the square root of the length. In model 3, it is assumed that subcutaneous fat is a poor conductor if electric current. An equation is developed that describes the partition of subcutaneous fat, and the fat layer is then removed from the cones representing arms and legs and from the cylinder that models the trunk.
KeywordsMultifrequency bio-electric impedance Total body water Model development
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ackmann, J.J., andSeitz, M.A. (1984): ‘Methods of complex impedance measurements in biological tissue’,CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.,11, pp. 281–311Google Scholar
- Allon, T.H., andPeng, M.T. (1952): ‘Prediction of total adiposity from skinfolds and the curvilinear relationship between external and internal adiposity’,Metab. Clin. Exp.,5, pp. 346–352Google Scholar
- Bland, J.M., andAltman, D.G. (1986): ‘Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement’,Lancet,1, pp. 307–310Google Scholar
- Cha, K., andChertow, G.M. (1995): ‘Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance estimates the distribution of body water’,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,79 (4), pp. 1316–1319Google Scholar
- Cha, K., Hill, A.G., Rounds, J.D., andWilmore, D.W. (1995a): ‘Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance fails to quantify sequestration of abdominal fluid’,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,78 (2), pp. 736–739Google Scholar
- Cha, K., Chertow, G.M., Conzales, J., andLazarus J.M. (1995b): ‘Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance estimates the distribution of body water.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,79 (4), pp. 1316–1319Google Scholar
- De Lorenzo, A., Andreoli, A., Matthie, J., andWithers P. (1997): ‘Predicting body cell mass with bio impedance by using theoretical methods: A technological review’,J. Appl. Physiol.,82, (5), pp. 1542–1558Google Scholar
- de Vries, P.M.J.M., vonk Noordegraaf, A., van der Meer, B.J.M., Woltjer, H.H., andde Vries, J.P.P.M. (1995): ‘Bioelectrical impedance analysis: Clinical tool in assessing total body water and thoracic fluid,’Int. J. Artif. Organs,18(11), pp. 693–699Google Scholar
- Hettrick, D.A., Battocletti, J.H., Ackmann, J.J., Linehan, J.H. andWarltier, D.C. (1997): ‘Effects of physical parameters on the cylindrical model for volume measurements by conductance’,Ann. Biomed Eng.,25, pp. 126–134Google Scholar
- Segal, K.R. Van Loan, M., Fitzgerald, P.I., Hodgdon, J.A. andVan Itallie, T.B. (1988): ‘Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis. A four site cross validation study’,Am. J. Clin. Nutr.,47, pp. 7–14Google Scholar