Summary
The most accurate method known to data for estimating age of wild vertebrates involves biochemical assay of eye lens proteins. Laboratory procedures that may be unfamiliar to many ecologists are described in detail. The method is based on precise changes in the amount of insoluble lens protein, and consists of two procedures: obtaining the appropriate lens fraction, and quantitatively analyzing its protein composition. Lenses are homogenized, and the insoluble fraction isolated by centrifugation. Protein content is measured colorimetrically by using the Lowry test. Instructions are given for single and double-beam spectrophotometers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Bonitati, J., W. B. Elliot andP. G. Miles (1969) Interference by carbohydrate and other substances in the estimation of protein with the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent.Anal. Biochem. 31: 399–404.
Dapson, R. W. andJ. M. Irland (In press) An accurate method of determining age in small mammals.Jour. Mamm.53.
Dapson, R. W., J. G. Otero andW. S. Holloway, Jr. (1968) Biochemical changes with age in the lenses of white mice.Nature 218: 573.
Dische, Z., E. Borenpreund andG. Zelmenis (1956) Changes in lens proteins of rats during aging.Arch. Ophthal. 55: 471–483.
Dunn, A. andJ. Arditti (1968)Experimental physiology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Friend, M. (1967) A review of research concerning eye-lens weight as a criterion of age in animals.N.Y. Fish and Game Jour. 14: 152–165.
Lowry, O. H., N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Fan andR. J. Randall (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.Jour. Biol. Chem. 193: 265.
Simpson, G. G., A. Roe andR. C. Lewontin (1960)Quantitative zoology. N. Y., Harcourt, Brace, and World. 440 p.
Steel, R. G. D. andJ. H. Torrie (1960)Principles and procedures of statistics. N. Y., McGraw-Hill. 481 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otero, J.G., Dapson, R.W. Procedures in the biochemical estimation of age of vertebrates. Res Popul Ecol 13, 152–160 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521974
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521974