Bulletin Géodésique

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 27–42 | Cite as

Semi-dynamical Doppler satellite positioning

  • J. Kouba
  • D. E. Wells
Article

Abstract

In semi-dynamical satellite geodesy, the satellite orbit is determined beforehand by dynamical methods, and tracking station coordinates are determined geometrically from satellite observations and the accepted satellite coordinates. This paper analyzes the use of the U.S. Navy Navigational Satellite Doppler (formerly Transit) system in the semidynamical mode, presenting some test network numberical results. Three error sources are considered: errors in the satellite coordinates, refractive errors on the Doppler observations, errors contributed by the tracking receivers. Compensatory techniques are discussed, such as relaxing the satellite orbit, ionospheric and tropospheric refraction reductions, tracking receiver time recovery, translocation.

Keywords

Broadcast Ephemeris Cross Track Precise Ephemeris Multistation Solution Track Coordinate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.J. Anderle, C.A. Malyevac, and H.L. Green (1969): “Effect of Neglected Gravity Coefficients on Computed Satellite Orbits and Geodetic Parameters”. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 6, No. 8.Google Scholar
  2. R.J. ANDERLE and M.G. TANNENBAUM (1974): “Practical Realization of Reference System for Earth Dynamics by Satellite Methods”. Technical Report 3161, U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, Dahlgren, Virginia.Google Scholar
  3. R.J. ANDERLE (1974): “Transformation of Terrestrial Survey Data to Doppler Satellite Datum”. Journal of Geophydcal Research, 79, pp. 5319–5331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. R.J. ANDERLE (1975): “Error Model for Geodetic Positions derived from Doppler Satellite Observations”. NSWC/DL-TR-3368, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Dahlgren, Virginia 22448.Google Scholar
  5. D. BROUWER (1963): “Minor secular and long-period effects” in Proceedings of the first international symposium on the use of artificial satellites for geodesy. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. DOD, (1972): “Report of the DOD Geoceiver Test Program”, DMA Report 0001.Google Scholar
  7. C.A. DUNNELL (1967): “TRANET Doppler tracking system”. APL Technical Digest, 6, No. 4, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
  8. P.J. FELL (1975): “The Use of Standard Weather Values and Refraction Bias Parameters in Orbit Determination”, The Canadian Surveyor, Vol. 29, No. 3, September.Google Scholar
  9. E.M. GAPOSCHKIN (1973): “1973 Smithsonian Standard Earth (III)”. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Special Report 353, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. W.H. GUIER and G.C. WEIFFENBACH (1960): “A satellite Doppler navigation system”. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 48, pp. 507–516.Google Scholar
  11. W.H. GUIER (1965): “satellite gaodesy”. APL TechnicalDigest, 4, No. 3, pp. 2–12.Google Scholar
  12. H.S. HOPFIELD (1969): “Two-quartic tropospheric refractivity profile for correcting satellite data”. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, pp. 4487–4499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. H.S. HOPFIELD (1971): “Tropospheric effect on electromagnetically measured range: prediction from surface weather data”. Radio Science, 6, pp. 357–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. H.S. HOPFIELD (1972): “Tropospheric refraction effect= oft satellite range measurements”. APL Technical Digest, 11, No. 4, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
  15. W.M. KAULA (1966): “Theory of satellite geodesy”, Blaisdell, Toronto.Google Scholar
  16. S.M. KLOSKO and W.B. KRABILL (1974): “C-Band Station Coordinate Determination for GEOS-C Altimeter Calibration Area”. Bulletin Géodésique, No. 114.Google Scholar
  17. J. KOUBA (1974): “Reduction of Doppler Satellite Data Observed in Canada”, The Canadian Surveyor, 28 Google Scholar
  18. J. KOUBA, A.E. PETERSON and J.D. BOAL (1974): “Recent Experience in Doppler Satellite Surveying”, presented at 14th International Congress of Surveyors, Washington, September.Google Scholar
  19. J. KOUBA (1975a): “Doppler Levelling”, submitted for publication in The Canadian Surveyor.Google Scholar
  20. J. KOUBA (1975b): “Doppler Satellite Control in Eatabliishlng Geodetic Control Network” presented at Canadian Geophysical Union Annual Meeting, Waterloo, May.Google Scholar
  21. J. KOUBA end J.D. BOAL (1975): “Program GEODOP Documentation”. Geodetic Survey of Canada.Google Scholar
  22. J.B. MOFFET (1973): “Program Requlrernent= for the Two-Minute Integrated Doppler Satellite Navigation”. APL Technical Memorandum TG-819-1 (Ray. 2), The John Hopkins University, Silver Springs, Maryland.Google Scholar
  23. R.R. NEWTON (1967): “The Navy Navigation Satellite System”. Space Research VII, 2, pp. 735–763.Google Scholar
  24. A.E. PETERSON (1974): “Merging of the Canadian Triangulation Network with 1973 Doppler Satellite Date”. The Canadian Surveyor, 28.Google Scholar
  25. M.C. PINCH (1974): “Test Adjustment of the Canadian Triangulation Network”. The Canadian Surveyor, 28.Google Scholar
  26. V.L. PISCANE, B.B. HOLLAND and H.D. BLACK (1973): “Recent (1973) improvements in the navy navigation satellite system”, Navigation, 20, pp. 223–229.Google Scholar
  27. T. SIMS (1972): “The NWL precise ephemeris}”. Technical Reports; TR-2872, U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory.Google Scholar
  28. T.H. STANSELL (1971): “Transit, the navy navigation eatallite system”. Navigation, 18, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar
  29. A. THORNDIKE (1973): “Notes on time recovery”, personal communication describing the improved time recovery algorithm implemented in receivers built for the Arctic Ice Dynamics Joint Experiment.Google Scholar
  30. A.S. THORNDIKE (1973): “An Integrated system for measuring sea ice motions”. Proceedings of the 1973 IEEE International Conference on Engineering In the Ocean Environment, pp. 490–499.Google Scholar
  31. A.S. THORNDIKE (1974): “Strain calculations using AIDJEX 1972 position date”. Arctic Ice Dynamics Joint Experiment Bulletin 24, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  32. P. VANICEK (1971): “Further development and properties of the spectral analysis by least squares”. Astrophysical and Space Sciencer 12, pp. 10–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. G.C. WEIFFENBACH (1967): “Tropospheric and ionospheric propagation effects on satellite radio Doppler geodesy”, pp. 339–352 in Electromagnetic Distance Measurement, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  34. D.E. WELLS (1972): “Analysis of Transit Antenna Pham Centre Measurements”. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  35. D.E. WELLS (1974): “Electromagnetic metrology, Hilbert space optimization, and their application to Doppler satellite control”, Ph. D. thesis, (available as Technical Report 29, surveying Engineering Department, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton).Google Scholar
  36. D.E. WELLS end J. KOUBA (1975): “Semi-Dynamical Doppler Satellite Positioning”, Preprint of paper presented at the Special General Ammbly of International Auociation of Geodesy, Grenoble, France, August 18–23.Google Scholar
  37. E.E. WESTERFIELD and G. WORSLEY (1966): “Translocation by navigation satellite”. APL Technical Digest 4, No. 5, 2–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bureau Central de L’Association Internationale de Géodésie 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Kouba
    • 1
  • D. E. Wells
    • 2
  1. 1.Surveys and Mapping Branch Department of Energy, Mines and ResourcesGeodetic Survey of CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Bedford Institute of OceanographyDartmouthCanada

Personalised recommendations