Measuring resource use in economic evaluations: Determining the social costs of mental illness
- 59 Downloads
Concern over costs associated with mental disorders has led to an increase in the number of economic evaluations of treatment interventions; unfortunately, methods for measuring resource use have not kept pace with this concern. Although it is well-known that a significant proportion of the costs associated with mental illness are for resources other than treatment, program evaluators and researchers often count only treatment costs in cost-effectiveness comparisons. Further, existing methods for measuring resource use are plagued by faulty assumptions about resource use, poor validity and reliability, and difficulties quantifying resource use. The authors discuss these problems and suggest five ways of improving measurement of nontreatment resources: clarifying assumptions, using multiple data sources, flexible data collection strategies, methods for improving the accuracy of recall, and an episodic approach to measurement.
KeywordsMental Health Mental Illness Social Cost Severe Mental Illness Mental Health Treatment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.Weisbrod BA: A guide to benefit-cost analysis, as seen through a controlled experiment in treating the mentally ill.Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1983; 8:808–845.Google Scholar
- 11.Shern DL, Saranga-Coen A, Nelson L, et al.: Innovative Service Delivery Models and the Cost of Chronic Mental Illness. Final Project Report to Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 1990.Google Scholar
- 12.Wolff N, Helminiak TW: The anatomy of cost estimates—The “other outcome.” In: Hu T, Rupp A (Eds.)Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, in press.Google Scholar
- 14.Rosenheck R, Frisman L, Neale M: Estimating the capital component of mental health care costs in the public sector.Administration and Policy in Mental Health. In press.Google Scholar
- 18.Weisbrod BA, Schlesinger M: Benefit-cost analysis in the mental health area: Issues and directions for research. In: McGuire TG, Weisbrod BA (Eds.):Economics and Mental Health. Rockville, MD: NIMH, 1981, pp. 8–28.Google Scholar
- 19.Teague GB, Drake RE: Mental health services research through a public-academic liaison: A comparison of two case management models.Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, Arlington, VA, NASMHPD, 1990.Google Scholar
- 20.Franks DD: The high cost of caring: Economic contribution of families to the care of the mentally ill. Dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 1987.Google Scholar
- 26.Clark RE, Drake RE, Teague GB: The costs and benefits of case management. In: Harris M, Bergman H (Eds.):Case Management for Mentally Ill Patients: Theory and Practice, New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1993, pp. 217–235.Google Scholar
- 28.Rice DP, Kelman S, Miller LS, et al.:The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness: 1985. Report submitted to the Office of Financing and Coverage Policy of the Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, 1990.Google Scholar
- 32.Peskin J: The value of household work in the 1980’s.American Statistical Association, 1983 Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section. 1983:266–271.Google Scholar