Skip to main content
Log in

How families of children with severe disabilities choose to allocate a cash subsidy

  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how families raising children with severe developmental disabilities use a cash subsidy. Eighty-one families were interviewed prior to receiving the $225 monthly subsidy and again 1 year later. Families reported no change in the number of services they used, nor did they significantly increase the amount spent on services. Although families did not spend significantly more on purchases in the month prior to each interview, there was a significant increase in the amount spent on major purchases made in the year after receipt of the subsidy. The pattern and amount of expenditures are described. Lower income families reported the subsidy as significantly more helpful than higher income families. The implications of the findings for social policy are discussed and recommendations are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zigler E, Berman W: Discerning the future of early childhood intervention.American Psychologist 1983; 38:894–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weissbourd B, Kagan SL: Family support programs: Catalysts for change.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1989;59:20–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckman PJ: Influence of selected child characteristics on stress in families on handicapped infants.American Journal on Mental Deficiency 1983;88:150–156.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wikler L, Hanusa D: The Impact of Respite Care on Stress in Families of Developmentally Disabled. Paper presented at the American Association on Mental Deficiency, San Francisco, May 1980.

  5. Sherman BR, Cocozza JJ: Stress in families of the developmentally disabled: A literature review of the factors affecting the decision to seek out-of-home placements.Family Relations 1984;33:95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Agosta JM, Bradley VJ (Eds.):Family Care for Persons with Developmental Disabilities: A Growing Commitment. Boston: Human Services Research Institute, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Starnes AL, et al.:Family Support Programs for Persons with Developmental Disabilities: Key Elements, Differential Characteristics and Program Outcomes. Family System Institute Monograph, 3:1. Morganton, NC: Center for Family Studies, Western Carolina Center, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moroney RM:Shared Responsibility, Families and Social Policy. New York: Aldine, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ireys HT, Moynihan, LC, Perrin, JM, et al.:The Constant Shadow: Childhood Chronic Illness in America, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baldwin S:The Cost of Caring: Families with Disabled Children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glendinning C:Unshared Care, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmerman SL: The mental retardation family subsidy program: Its effects on families with a mentally handicapped child.Family Relations 1984;33:105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herman, SE: Use and impact of a cash subsidy program.Mental Retardation 1991;29:253–258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyers JC, Marcenko MO: The impact of a cash subsidy program for families of children with severe developmental disabilities.Mental Retardation 1990;27:383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herman SE:Baseline Study on Family Support Services in the State of Michigan. Lansing: Department of Mental Health, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michigan Department of Social Services: Information packet. Lansing, MI: Policy Analysis Section, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marcenko MO, Smith, LK: The impact of a family-centered case management approach.Social Work in Health Care 1992;13:413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor SJ: The paradox of regulations: A commentary.Mental Retardation 1992;30:185–190.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is based on research supported by grants from the Michigan Developmental Disabilities Council, the University of Michigan Rackham Faculty Grant Program, and Wayne State University. The views expressed herein are sllely those of the authors and do not represent the opinions or policies of any agency of the State of Michigan. This research was conducted while Maureen Marcenko was an assistant professor in the School of Social Work and the acting director of the Developmental Disabilities Institute at Wayne State University; Judith C. Meyers was an associate director of the Bush Program in Child Development and Social Policy at the University of Michigan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcenko, M.O., Meyers, J.C. How families of children with severe disabilities choose to allocate a cash subsidy. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 21, 253–261 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521332

Keywords

Navigation