Abstract
Administrators often receive requests for proposals (RFP), alerting them of the availability of funding. Applying for such funded service programs may or may not be beneficial to the agency the administrator leads. This article suggests a series of seven evaluation procedures for use in determining the potential outcome of securing the proposed program. It is recommended that this evaluation process be considered before the administrator responds to an RFP.
References
Bachrach L: Deinstitutionalization of mental health services in rural areas. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1977: 28:669–672.
Husaini B, Neff J, Stone R: Psychiatric impairment in rural communities. Journal of Community Psychology 1979; 7:137–146.
Fogel M, Oleckno W: The marketing approach as a model for mental health needs assessment. Journal of Mental Health Administration 1983; 10:46–48.
White S: Managing Health and Human Services Programs: A Guide For Managers. New York: Macmillan, 1981.
Sorenson J, Phillips D: Cost-Finding and Rate-Setting For Community Mental Health Centers. Washington: National Institute of Mental Health, DHEW No. (ADM) 76-291, 1975.
Harney E: Financing mental health services. In: Feldman S (ed). The Administration of Mental Health Services. Springfield: Thomas, 1973.
Newman F, Sorenson J: Integrated Clinical and Fiscal Management in Mental Health: A Guidebook. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985.
Perry R: Survival is not enough-the case for profit. Journal of Mental Health Administration 1987; 14:37–39.
Miller G, Rago W: Fiscal incentives to development of services in the community. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988; 39:595–597.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, M.D. The seven elements of RFP evaluation: Is an RFP a solution or an added problem?. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 17, 211–216 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521151
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521151