Skip to main content
Log in

A robust approach to global problems in physical geodesy

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A technique for renormalization of integral equations is used for obtaining very robust solutions. The number of multiplications used for inverting the integral equations can be reduced dramatically and mostly only weighted means will be needed. Theoretical gain in computer time might be up to 100 000 times for the most favourable cases when using 1000 unknowns. (Practical gains will be considerably less.) Solutions have been obtained with increased accuracy compared to the classical technique over integral equations. Surface elements might be of arbitrary size but the method is optimal for a global approach with equal area elements. The solutions were found strictly invariant with respect to the depth to the internal sphere, when using simpler models.

Applications in surveying are possible after some modifications.

Renormalization of integral equation has been widely used in the theory of quantum field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. BJERHAMMAR: Gravity Reduction to a Spherical Surface of Reference. Technical Report, Div. Geodesy, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. BJERHAMMAR: A New Theory of Geodetic Gravity. Trans. Royal Institute of Technology, No. 243, Stockholm, 1964.

  • A. BJERHAMMAR: Linear Prediction and Filtering, Festschrift Karl Ledersteger, Osterr. Ver. Verm. Wse., Wien, 1970.

  • A. BJERHAMMAR: Discrete Approaches to the Solution of the Boundary Value Problem in Physical Geodesy. Erice, 1974. (Boll. d. Geodesia e Scienze Affini, 34, No. 2, pp. 185–240, 1975.)

  • A. BJERHAMMAR: Dirac Approach to Physical Geodesy. ZfV 101, pp. 41–44, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. BJERHAMMAR and Leif SVENSSON: The convergence of harmonic reduction to an internal sphere. Bull. Géod. No. 3, pp. 247–257, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. BOSSLER: Megatrends in geodesy. AGU, NOAA Rockville (in press), 1984.

  • J. DENY: Systemes totaux des fonctions harmoniques. Ann. de l'Institut Fourier, 1949.

  • A.S. GOLDERGER: Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Generalized Linear Regression Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, pp. 369–375, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. HOLOTA: The Altimetry-Gravity Boundary Value Problem. Intercosmos, Bulgaria Albena, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. HÖRMANDER: The Boundary Value Problem of Physical Geodesy. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 62, pp. 1–52, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.L. INGRAHAM: Renormalization. Theory of Quantum Field. Theory of Cut-Off. Gorder and Breach. City of Publisher, 1980.

  • K.E. KATSAMBALOS: Comparison of Some Undulation Prediction Techniques from Altimeter Data. Report No. 303, Dept. of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.E. KATSAMBALOS: Simulation Studies of the Computation of the Gravity Vector in Space from Surface Data Considering the Topography of the Earth. Ohio State University, Dept. of Geodetic Science Rep. 314, Columbus, 1981.

  • M. KELDYCH and M. LAVRENTIEFF: Sur les Suites Convergentes de Polynomes Harmoniques. Travaux Inst. Math. Tbilissi, pp. 165–184, T.l. 1937.

  • T. KRARUP: A Contribution to the Mathematical Foundations of Physical Geodesy. Geod. Inst. Medd., 44, Copenhagen, 1969.

  • D.L. LAURITZEN: Methods in Physical Geodesy. Geodetisk Institut, Copenhagen 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. MORITZ: Advanced Least Squares Methods. Report Dept. Geodetic Science, No. 175, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. MORITZ: Least Squares Collocation. Rev. Geoph. Space Phys., 16:3, pp. 421–430, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. RAPP: The Formation and Analysis of a 5°×5° Equal Area Block Terrestrial Gravity Field. Ohio State University, Dept. of Geodetic Science Rep. No. 178, Columbus, 1972.

  • U. RAUHALA: A Review of Array Algebra. DBA Systems INC, Florida, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. SÜNKEL: A General Surface Representation Module Designed for Geodesy. Report No. 292, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. SÜNKEL: Cardinal Interpolation. Report No. 312, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. SVENSSON: A new geodesy based upon inversion free Bjerhammar predictors. Eighth symposium on mathematical geodesy. Como 1981. Published Firenze 1983.

  • C.C. TSCHERNING and R.H. RAPP: Closed Covariance Expressions for Gravity Anomalies, Geoid Undulations, and Deflections of the Vertical Implied by Anomaly Degree Variance Models. Ohio State University, Dept. of Geodetic Science Rep. 208, Columbus, 1974.

  • C.C. TSCHERNING: On the Use and Abuse of Molodensky's Mountain. In: Geodesy in Transition. Ed. K.P. Schwarz and G. Lachapelle. Surveying Engineering Publication 60002, 1983.

  • J.L. WALSH: The Approximation of Harmonic Functions by Harmonic Polynomials and by Harmonic Rational Functions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 35, pp. 499–544, 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bjerhammar, A. A robust approach to global problems in physical geodesy. Bull. Geodesique 59, 303–315 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521065

Keywords

Navigation