Abstract
A comparison is made between methods for surface analysis which use low-energy electron beams, and methods such as those using surface conductance and field effect. The distinction between these two groups of methods is relevant to the case of semiconductors. Surface conductance and field effect measurements have a high sensitivity, 108–1010 excess charges per cm2 near the surface being detectable, but they do not reveal the chemical composition of the surface. On the other hand, Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), which uses low-energy electrons, is less sensitive, 1012–1013 foreign atoms per cm2 being detectable, but this method is highly specific with respect to the sort of atoms (and in some cases molecules) present on the surface. A number of applications of AES are given. Another method, that of low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), can only be used for surfaces of single crystals. With LEED, values of repeat distances at the surface can be found. In some cases these are very sensitive to the concentrations of foreign atoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. H. Brattain, J. Bardeen,Bell Syst Tech., J., 32 (1953) 1.
A. Many, Y. Goldstein, N. B. Grover, Semiconductor Surfaces, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965.
D. R. Frankl, Electrical Properties of Semiconductor Surfaces, Pergamon, Oxford, 1967.
L. A. Harris,J. Appl. Phys., 39 (1968) 1419.
C. C. Chang,Surf. Sci., 25 (1971) 53 (a review).
P. J. Estrup, E. G. McRae,Surf. Sci., 25 (1971) 1 (a review).
D. P. Smith,Surf. Sci., 25 (1971) 171 (a review).
A. Benninghoven, S. Storp,Z. Angew. Phys., 31 (1971) 31;A. Benninghoven,Z. Phys., 230 (1970) 403.
H. W. Werner, in Developments in Applied Spectroscopy, 7A (1969) 239.
Z. Jurela, in Atomic Collisions Phenomena in Solids, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, p. 339.
E. Schlegel,I.E.E.E. Trans. on Electron Devices, ED 14 (1967) 728; and ED 15 (1968) 951.
J. Bardeen, W. Shockley,Phys. Rev., 74 (1948) 230; 75 (1949) 203.J. Bardeen, W. H. Brattain Phys. Rev., 75 (1949) 1208.
P. Handler, in Semiconductor Surface Physics (Kingston Ed.), Philadelphia, 1957, p. 23.
R. E. Schlier, H. E. Farnsworth, in Semiconductor Surface Physics (Kingston, Ed.), Philadelphia, 1957, p. 3; andJ. Chem. Phys., 30 (1959) 917.
C. J. Davisson, L. H. Germer,Phys. Rev., 30 (1927) 705.
A. H. Boonstra,Philips Res. Repts. Suppl., 1968, No. 3.
M. J. Sparnaay, J. van Ruler,Physica, 27 (1961) 153.
M. J. Sparnaay,Surf. Sci., 13 (1969) 99.
A. J. van Bommel, F. Meyer,Surf. Sci., 8 (1967) 467.
A. J. van Bommel, F. Meyer,Surf. Sci., 8 (1967) 381.
J. J. Lander, J. Morrison,J. Chem. Phys., 37 (1962) 729.
R. M. Stern, J. J. Perry, D. S. Boudreaux,Rev. Mod Phys., 41 (1969) 275.
H. Bethe,Ann. Physik., 87 (1928) 55.
M. B. Webb, M. G. Lagally, Lecture Notes Fifth Low-energy Electron Diffraction Seminar, Washington, D. C., 1971 (not published).
J. J. Vrakking, F. Meyer,Appl. Phys. Lett., 18 (1971) 226.
F. Meyer, E. E. de Kluizenaar, G. A. Bootsma,Surf. Sci., 27 (1971) 88;G. A. Bootsma, F. Meyer,Surf. Sci., 13 (1969) 14; 52 (1969) 110.
B. A. Joyce, J. H. Neave,Surf. Sci., 27 (1971) 499.
A. R. Miller, The Adsorption of Gases on Solids, Cambridge U.P., 1949, p. 64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sparnaay, M.J. Surface analysis with the aid of low-energy electrons. J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 101–114 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520980
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520980