Advertisement

Bulletin géodésique

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 137–150 | Cite as

Strain analysis along the North Analtolian Fault by using geodetic surveys

  • Kamil Eren
Article

Abstract

In earthquake prediction studies geodetic surveys play a very significant role. For this purpose, in Turkey, three micro geodetic networks have been established across the North Anatolian Fault. Of these, the Ismetpa§a Network is the subject of this paper. From the observations in combined triangulation—trilateration mode in 1972 and 1982 the horizontal movements and strain components were determined. Afterwards the parameters of the best fitting deformation model were computed and analyzed. The results show that the Anatolian plate has about a 1 cm/year westward motion, and there exists considerable strain accumulation in the area.

Keywords

Shear Strain Strain Component Strain Accumulation Arabian Plate North Anatolian Fault 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. CHRZANOWSKI, Y.Q. CHEN and J.M. SECORD, 1982: “On the Strain Analysis of Tectonic Movements Using Fault Crossing Geodetic Surveys”. University of New Brunswick, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. M. ERDIK, V. DOYURAN, P. GÜLKAN and N. AKKAŞ, 1983: “A Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard in Turkey”. METU/EERC Report No. 83-1, Ankara.Google Scholar
  3. K. EREN, 1982: “Earthquake Predictions by Utilizing Horizontal and Vertical Movement on North Anatolian Fault”. Project Code No. 81-04-03-02, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Google Scholar
  4. F.C. FRANK, 1966 “Deduction of Earth Strains from Survey Data”. BSSA, Vol. 56, pp. 34–42.Google Scholar
  5. W.C. HAMILTON, 1964:Statistics in Physical Science. The Ronald Press Company, New York.Google Scholar
  6. X. Le PICHON, 1968: “Sea Floor Spreading and Continental Drift”, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 73, pp. 3661–3697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. M. LISOWSKI and J.C. SAVAGE, 1976: “Strain Accumulation from 1964 to 1977 near Epicentral Zone of the 1976–1977 Earthquake Swarm Southeast of Palmdale, California”. BSSA, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 751–756.Google Scholar
  8. M. LISOWSKI and W.H. PRESCOTT, 1981: “Short Range Distant Measurements Along the San Andreas Fault System in Central California, 1975 to 1979”. BSSA, Vol. 71, No. 5, pp. 1607–1624.Google Scholar
  9. D.P. McKENZIE, 1970: “Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region”, Nature, Vol. 226, pp. 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D.P. McKENZIE, 1972: “Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region”. Geophys. J.R. Astr. Soc., Vol. 30, pp. 109–185.Google Scholar
  11. W.H. PRESCOTT, 1976: “An Extension of Frank's Method for Obtaining Crustal Shear Strains from Survey Data”. BSSA, Vol. 66, pp. 1847–1854.Google Scholar
  12. J.C. SAVAGE, M. LISOWSKI, W.H. PRESCOTT and N.E. KING, 1981: “Strain Accumulation near the Epicenters of the 1978 Bishop and 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, Earthquake”. BSSA, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 465–476.Google Scholar
  13. A.R. SNAY and M.W. CLINE, 1980: “Geodetically Derived Strain at Shelter Cove, California”. BSSA, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 893–901.Google Scholar
  14. A.R. SNAY, M.W. CLINE and E.L. TIMMERMAN, 1982: “Horizontal Deformation in the Imperial Valley, California, Between 1934 and 1980”. J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 87, pp. 3959–3968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. E. UĜUR, 1974: “Kuzey Anadolu Fay Ku§agi Üzerinde Yerkabuĝu Hareketlerinin Jeodezik Yöntemlerle Etüdü”, Harita Genel Komutanligi Matbaasi, Ankara.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bureau Central de L’Association Internationale de Géodésie 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamil Eren
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering Earthquake Engineering Research CenterMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkara(Turkey)

Personalised recommendations