Advertisement

Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 119–127 | Cite as

The influence of the geometry of the stationary phase on the efficiency of extraction chromatographic systems

  • S. Specht
  • R. F. Nolte
  • H. -J. Born
Solvent Extraction Chemistry
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The importance of the extraction medium and its film geometry to the separation efficiency is illustrated by the example of the chromatographic extraction systems HDEHP-HCl-Eu3+ and TBP-HNO3−Sc3+. Starting from the geometry of the matrix, the effects of the exchange kinetics and flow pattern were experimentally proved. Exchange kinetics are described as a heterogeneous transport-limited reaction in the aqueous phase. Four ranges of the rate of exchange with the geometry of the matrix (pore diameter) were found. The flow patterns in the chromatographic layer can be established by the individual pore cross-sectional area of the matrix. The sum of the effects of exchange kinetics and flow patterns determines the chromatographic efficiency of the systems. Their relative effects in the two systems being investigated are discussed.

Keywords

Pore Diameter Retention Volume HDEHP Exchange Kinetic Plate Height 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. J. Kirkland, Modern practice of liquid chromatography, Wiley, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. C. Giddings, Dynamics of Chromatography, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. H. Knox, M. Saleem, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 7 (1969) 745.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Siekierski, R. J. Sochacka, J. Chromatogr., 16 (1964) 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. A. Bray, Progr. Coord. Chem. (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. W. Roddy, C. F. Coleman, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 33 (1971) 1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. M. Karpacheva, L. V. Ilozheva, Radiokhimiya, 12 (1970) 460.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Bosholm, W. Pippel, Z. Phys. Chem., 227 (1964) 217.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. L. Lyle, D. B. Smith, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 35 (1973) 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. P. Horwitz, E. P. Bloomquist, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 34 (1973) 3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Specht
    • 1
  • R. F. Nolte
    • 1
  • H. -J. Born
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Radiochemie der Technischen Universität MünchenGarching/MünchenFRG

Personalised recommendations