Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verteilung von Säure, Wasser, Methanol, Äthanol und Aceton Zwischen Gemischt Wässrig-Organischen Salpetersäurelösungen und Lösungen von Trilaurylammoniumnitrat in Cyclohexan

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of acid, water, methanol, ethanol and acetone between mixed aqueous-organic nitric acid solutions and solutions of trilaurylammoniumnitrate in cyclohexane has been investigated. The distribution of acid rises with increasing concentrations of nitric acid, methanol, ethanol and acetone in the mixed aqueous-organic phase. The effect of the organic additives in increasing the distribution of the acid is methanol<ethanol<acetone. The concentration of nitric acid in the organic phase can be calculated by a formula similar to that describing the extraction from pure aqueous solutions. The distribution curves of water, methanol and ethanol resemble each other, all of them showing a minimum, when the distribution ration is plotted versus the nitric acid concentration in the mixed aqueous-organic phase. The acetone distribution decreases steadily with increasing nitric acid concentration. The shape of the curves is briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. A. ALIAN, W. SANAD, R. SHABANA, A. HAGGAG, Microchem. J., 16 (1971) 515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. E. JÜNGER, E. R. SCHMID, Monatsh. Chem., 105 (1974) 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. R. SCHMID, E. JÜNGER, E. KENNDLER, Monatsh. Chem., 104 (1973) 1560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. VOGEL, A Textbook of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. 3. Aufl., Longmans, 1964.

  5. K. H. BAUER, H. MOLL, Die organische Analyse, 4. Aufl., Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig KG, Leipzig, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. J. PEREZ, Report CEA-R-2860, 1968.

  7. Y. MARCUS, A. S. KERTES, Ion Exchange and Solvent Extraction of Metal Complexes, Wiley-Interscience, London, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. MARKL, Methoden der Analyse in der Chemie, Band 13, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt/Main, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. KERTES, I. T. PLATZNER, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 24 (1962) 1417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. KNOCH, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 27 (1965) 2075.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. H. TIMMINS, E. A. MASON, USAEC Rept., MITNE-30, 1963.

  12. R. BAC, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 32 (1970) 3655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. GOURISSE, Rapport CEA-R3005, 1966.

  14. G. GROSSI, R. PALOMBARI, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 32 (1970) 2743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. E. KEDER, A. S. WILSON, Nucl. Sc. Eng., 17 (1963) 287.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. P. J. VERSTEGEN, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 26 (1964) 1085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. M. P. J. VERSTEGEN, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 26 (1964) 1589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. P. J. VERSTEGEN, Kjeller-Report KR-68, 1964.

  19. J. M. P. J. VERSTEGEN, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 27 (1965) 201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu. G. FROLOV, et al., At. Energ. Rev. 7 (1969) 71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. V. N. SHESTERIKOV, V. S. SHMIDT, Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 40 (1966) 1043.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. S. SHMIDT, V. N. SHESTERIKOV, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 39 (1965) 440.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. S. SHMIDT, V. N. SHESTERIKOV, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 39 (1965) 3007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. ALLERHAND, P. R. SCHLEYER, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85 (1965) 1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. BUFALINI, K. H. STERN, Science, 130 (1959) 1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. BUFALINI, K. H. STERN, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83 (1961) 4362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu. G. FROLOV, V. V. SERGIEVSKY, G. I. SERGIEVSKAYA, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 13 (1968) 1909.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. B. KINGSTON, M. C. R. SYMONS, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 69 (1973) 978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. H. LUND, Acta Chem. Scand., 12 (1958) 298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. E. A. RICHARDSON, R. H. STERN, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82 (1960) 1296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. R. BAC, Radiochim. Acta, 13 (1970) 16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D. J. TURNER, R. M. DIAMOND, J. Phys. Chem., 72 (1968) 3504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Analytischen Institut der Universität Wien, Währinger Straße 38, A-1090, Wien, (Österreich)

    E. R. Schmid & E. Kenndler

Authors
  1. E. R. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Kenndler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmid, E.R., Kenndler, E. Verteilung von Säure, Wasser, Methanol, Äthanol und Aceton Zwischen Gemischt Wässrig-Organischen Salpetersäurelösungen und Lösungen von Trilaurylammoniumnitrat in Cyclohexan. J. Radioanal. Chem. 25, 75–87 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519539

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519539

Search

Navigation