Skip to main content
Log in

A new method of quench monitoring in liquid scintillation counting: The H number concept

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quench level of different liquid scintillation counting samples is measured by comparison of the responses (pulse heights) produced by the same energy electrons in each sample. The electrons utilized in the measurements are those of the maximum energy (Emax) which are produced by the single Compton scattering process for the same energy gamma-rays in each sample. The relation of the Emax response produced in any sample is related to the Emax response produced in an unquenched, sealed standard. The relation, difference in response on a logarithm response scale, is defined as the “H Number,” H#. The H# is related to the counting efficiency of the desired radionuclide by measurement of a set of standards of known amounts of the radionuclide and different amounts of quench (standard quench curve). This report presents the theory of the H# concept. Several of the unique features of the H# method are discussed. Quench curves based upon the H# are compared to other previously used methods of quench monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. L. HORROCKS, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 30 (1964) 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. L. HORROCKS, Nucl. Instr. Meth., 117 (1974) 589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

D. L. Horrocks, US Patent No. 4,075,480.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horrocks, D.L. A new method of quench monitoring in liquid scintillation counting: The H number concept. J. Radioanal. Chem. 43, 489–521 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519509

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519509

Keywords

Navigation