Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reinterpreting the Fort Bragg Evaluation findings: The message does not change

  • Rejoinder
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salzer MS, Bickman L: Delivering effective children’s services in the community: Reconsidering the benefits of systems of care.Applied and Preventive Psychology, in press.

  2. Rivera VR, Kutash K:Components of a System of Care: What Does the Research Say? Tampa: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute Research and Training Center for Children’s Mental Health 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weisz JR, Donenberg GR, Han SS, et al.: Bridging the gap between lab and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1995; 63(5):688–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickman L. Implications of a children’s mental health managed care demonstration evaluation.,Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  5. Lambert EW, Guthrie PR: Clinical outcomes of a children’s mental health managed care demonstration.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  6. Foster M, Bickman L: The Sensitivity of the Fort Bragg Results to Differential Attrition. Unpublished report, Vanderbilt University Center for Mental Health Policy, 1995.

  7. Friedman RM, Burns BJ: The evaluation of the Fort Bragg Demonstration Project: An alternative interpretation of the findings.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  8. Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, et al.: The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Special issue: Psychotherapy Research,American Psychologist 1986; 41(2):159–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schut LJA, Bickman L: Termination and Outcome in Outpatient Mental Health Services for Children and Adolescents. Unpublished report, Vanderbilt University Center for Mental Health Policy, 1995.

  10. Salzer MS, Bickman L: Dose Response Relationships in Child and Adolescent Outpatient Services. Unpublished report, Vanderbilt University Center for Mental Health Policy, 1995.

  11. Breda CS: Methodological issues in evaluating mental health outcomes of a children’s mental health managed care demonstration.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  12. Bickman L, Guthrie P, Foster EM, et al.:Evaluating Managed Mental Health Care: The Fort Bragg Experiment. New York: Plenum, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lane T: Comment on the final report of the Fort Bragg Evaluation Project.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  14. Behar L: Policy implications of the evaluation of the Fort Bragg Child and Adolescent Mental Health Demonstration Project.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  15. Foster EM, Summerfelt WT, Saunders RC: The costs of mental health services under the Fort Bragg Demonstration.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  16. Bickman L: The evaluation of a children’s mental health managed care demonstration.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  17. Heflinger CA: Implementing a system of care: Findings from the Fort Bragg Evaluation Project.,Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

  18. Bryant DM, Bickman L: Methodology for evaluating mental health case management.Evaluation and Program Planning, in press.

  19. Broskowski A: Current mental health care environments: Why managed care is necessary.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1991; 22(1):6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodman M, Brown J, Deitz P:Managing Managed Care: A Mental Health Practitioners Survival Guide. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen DP, Rickles J, Travlik K: A treatment-team model of managed mental health care.Psychiatric Services 1995; 46:252–256.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Landress HJ, Bernstein MA: Managed care 101: An overview and implications for psychosocial rehabilitation services.Innovations and Research 1994; 33(1):33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bickman L: The application of program theory to a managed mental health care evaluation.Evaluation and Program Planning, in press.

  24. Paris ML: The Fort Bragg Demonstration Project: A look back.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1996; 23(1).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, 1207 18th Ave. South, 37212, Nashville, TN

    Leonard Bickman Ph.D. (Professor of Psychology, Psychiatry, and Public Policy)

Authors
  1. Leonard Bickman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bickman, L. Reinterpreting the Fort Bragg Evaluation findings: The message does not change. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 23, 137–145 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518652

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518652

Keywords

Search

Navigation