The quality of services in a children’s mental health managed care demonstration
- 28 Downloads
The Fort Bragg Demonstration and evaluation was designed to test the cost-effectiveness of a continuum of care model of service delivery for children and adolescents. A crucial aspect of the evaluation was the measurement of the quality of services provided in the Demonstration. Two key service components were examined: intake assessment and case management. It was concluded that these key components of the continuum of care were implemented with sufficient quality to have the theoretically predicted effects on mental health.
KeywordsMental Health Service Case Management Concept Mapping Evaluation Project Intake Assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bickman L, Peterson K: Using program theory to describe and measure program quality. In: Bickman L. (Ed.):Advances in Program Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
- 2.Peterson K, Bickman L (Eds.):Normative Theory and Program Quality in Mental Health Services. Westwood MA: Greenwood, 1992.Google Scholar
- 3.Bickman L: Improving estabilhed statewide programs: A component theory of evaluation.Evaluation Review 1985; 9:189–208.Google Scholar
- 5.American Psychological Association Practice Directorate: Integrated care challenges managed care.Practitioner 1992; 5(2):1.Google Scholar
- 6.Jerrell J, Hargreaves W:The Operating Philosophy of Community Programs. Working Paper series 18. Berkeley: Institute for Mental Health, 1991.Google Scholar
- 10.Stroul BA, Friedman R:A System of Care for Children and Youth with Severe Emotional Disturbances. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center, 1986.Google Scholar
- 11.Behar L: The North Carolina Willie M. Program: One model for services to multiple handicapped children. In: Stark JA, Menolascino FJ, Albarelli MH, Gray VC (Eds.):Mental Retardation and Mental Health: Classification, Diagnosis, Treatment, Services. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 416–429.Google Scholar
- 12.Levine I, Fleming M:Human Resource Development: Issues in Case Management. College Park: University of Maryland, 1984.Google Scholar
- 13.Weil M, Karls J: Conceptualization for planning and evaluation.Evaluation and Program Planning 1986; 9(4):239–308.Google Scholar
- 14.Bagarozzi D, Kurtz L: Administrators’ perspectives on case management.Arete 1983; 8:13–21.Google Scholar
- 15.Mueller B, Hopp M: Attitudinal, administrative, legal, and fiscal barriers to case management.Internal Journal of Mental Health 1987; 15:44–58.Google Scholar