Bloom JD: The insanity defense since Hinckley. Panel presentation at the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Washington, D.C., 1989.
Pasewark RA, Pantle M, Steadman HJ: Detention and rearrest rates of person found not guilty by reason of insanity and convicted felons.American Journal of Psychiatry 1982; 892:139.
Bloom JD, Rogers JL, Manson SM: After Oregon’s insanity defense: a comparison of conditional release and hospitalization.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1982; 5:391–402.
Bloom JD, Rogers JL, Manson SM, et al.: Lifetime police contacts of discharged Psychiatric Security Review Board clients.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1986; 8:189–202.
Rogers JL, Bloom JD, Manson SM: Oregon’s new insanity defense system: a review of the first five years, 1978–1982.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 1984; 12:383–402.
Rogers JL, Bloom JD, Manson SM: Oregon’s PSRB: A comprehensive system for managing insanity acquittees.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 1986; 484:86–99.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Governor’s Special Advisory Panel on Forensic Mental Health. Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1989.
McGreevy MA, Steadman HJ, Dvoskin JA, et al: New York State’s system of managing insanity acquittees in the community.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1991; 42:512–517.
Bloom JD, Williams M, Rogers J, et al: Evaluation and treatment of insanity acquittees in the community.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 1986; 14:231–244.
Bloom JD, Williams MH, Bigelow DA: Monitored conditional release of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity.American Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 148:444–448.
Spodak MK, Silver SB, Wright CV: Criminality of discharged insanity acquittees: Fifteen years experience in Maryland reviewed.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 1984; 12:373–382.
Lamb H, Weinberger, L, Gross, B: Court-mandated outpatient treatment for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity: a five year follow-up.American Journal of Psychiatry 1988; 139:892–897.
Wiederanders M, Choate P: The effectiveness of the Conditional Release Program: current research findings. Presented at the Forensic Mental Health Association of California, Asilomar, California, 1991.
Wiederanders M: The effectiveness of the conditional release program: a report to the legislature in response to Chapter 1416, Statutes of 1985. Sacramento: California Department of Mental Health, 1990.
Lamb H, Weinberger L, Gross B: Court-mandated outpatient treatment for insanity acquittees: clinical philosophy and implementation.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988; 39:1080–1084.
Scott D, Zonana H, Getz M: Monitoring insanity acquittees: Connecticut’s Psychiatric Security Review Board.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41:980–984.
Stern F, Lewis M: Psychiatric Security Review Board in Connecticut and its impact of the mental health service delivery system for the not guilty by reason of insanity population.American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 1988; 9:49–57.
Dvoskin J: The Palm Beach County, Florida forensic mental health services program: a comprehensive community-based system. In: Steadman HJ, McCarty DW, Morrissey JP (eds.):The Mentally Ill in Jail: Planning for Essential Services. New York: Guilford, 1989.
Heilbrun K, Griffin PA: Community-based forensic treatment: a review. In: Weisstub D (ed.):Law and Mental Health: International Perspectives. In Press.
Cavanaugh JL, Wasyliw OE: Adjustment of the not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) outpatient: an initial report.Journal of Forensic Sciences 1985; 30:24–30.
Cavanaugh JL, Wasyliw OE: Treating the not guilty by reason of insanity outpatient: a two-year study.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 1985; 13:407–415.
Cohen M, Spodak M, Silver S, et al: Predicting outcome of insanity acquittees released to the communityBehavioral Sciences and the Law 1988; 6:515–530.
Silver S, Cohen M, Spodak M: Follow-up after release of insanity acquittees, mentally disordered offenders, and convicted felons.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 1989; 17:387–400.
Silver S: Lessons from Maryland’s conditional release program for not guilty by reason of insanity persons. Presented at the Annual Conference for Mental Health and the Law, Richmond, VA, 1991.
Bigelow DA, Bloom JD, William MH: Costs of managing insanity acquittees under a psychiatric security review board system.Hospital and community Psychiatry 1990; 1:613–614.
Bloom JD, Bradford JM, Kofoed L: An overview of psychiatric treatment approaches to three offender groups.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1988; 39:151–158.
Norwood S, Nicholson RA, Enyart C, et al: Insanity acquittal in Oklahoma: recommendations for program planning and social policy.Forensic Report. In Press.
Bogenberger RP, Pasewark RA, Gudeman H, et al: Follow up of insanity acquittees in Hawaii.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1987; 10:283–295.
Melton GB, Petrila J, Poythress NG, Slobogin C:Psychological Evaluations for the Courts. New York: Guilford Press, 1987.
Perlin MB,Mental Disability Law: Civil and Criminal. Vol. 3. Charlottesville, Virginia: The Michie Co., 1989.
Reisner R:Law and the Mental Health System: Civil and Criminal Aspects. St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co., 1985.
Hauser S: Commitment and release of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity: a Georgia perspective.Georgia Law Review 1981; 15:1065–1103.
California Dept. of Mental Health: An introduction to the forensic mental health system in California. Sacramento: California Dept. of Mental Health, 1991.
Section 916.15, Florida Statutes.
Monahan J:Predicting Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques: Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.
Steadman HJ, Cocozza, JP: Careers of the Criminally Insane. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1974.
Section 161.336, Oregon Statutes.
Jones vs. United States, 1-3 S. Ct. 3043, 1983.
Callahan L, Mayer C, Steadman HJ: Insanity defense reform in the United States post Hinckley.Mental Disability Law Reporter 1987; 11:54–59.
Steadman HJ, Cocozza, JP: Selective reporting and the public misconceptions of the criminally insane.Public Opinion Quarterly 1978; 4:523–533.
Perlin ML: Unpacking the myths: the symbolism mythology of insanity defense jurisprudence.Case Western Law Review 1989; 40:599–731.
Petrella RC, Six TL: Profile of NGRI patients in Virginia.Developments in Mental Health Law 1989; 9:8–12.
Heilbrun K, Heilbrun PG, Griffin N: Comparing females acquitted by reason of insanity, convicted, and civilly committed in Florida: 1977–1984.Law and Human Behavior 1988; 12:295–311.
Laws DR: Relapse Prevention with Sex Offenders. New York: Guilford, 1989.