Abstract
The practical use of a correction procedure for random coincidence losses, the determination of the detection limit and the standardization of measuring conditions are described. Special correction methods for the interference of the Cu analysis by24Na, the burn-up of the radioactive nuclide formed and the interference of the Pt determination by Au are also given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.L. VERHEIJKE, J. Radional. Chem., 10 (1972) 299.
M.L. VERHEIJKE, J.C. VERPLANKE, J. Radioanal. Chem., 15 (1973) 509.
M.L. VERHEIJKE, Philips Technical Review, 34 (1974) 330.
J. BARTOŠEK, J. MAŠEK, F. ADAMS, J. HOSTE, Nucl. Instr. Methods, 104 (1972) 221.
A. WYTTENBACH, J. Radioanal. Chem., 8 (1971) 335.
H.R. RALSTON, G.E. WILCOX, Modern Trends in Activation Analysis, Vol. II, J.R. DEVOE (Ed.), National Bureau of Standards, Washington D.C. 1969, p. 1238.
R. GUNNINK, J.B. NIDAY, UCRL-51061-I, 1972.
J.H. HUBBELL, M.J. BERGER, National Bureau of Standards Report, 8681, 1966.
J.C. VERPLANKE, Nucl. Instr. Methods. 96 (1971) 557.
W. RUBINSON, J. Chem. Phys., 17 (1949) 542.
D. DE SOETE, R. GIJBELS, J. HOSTE, Neutron Activation Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, London, 1972.
W. MAENHAUT, J.P. OP DE BECK, J. Radioanal. Chem. 5 (1970) 115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verheijke, M.L. Some practical procedures in computerized thermal neutron activation analysis with Ge(Li) gamma-ray spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Chem. 35, 79–93 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518215
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02518215