Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 135–149 | Cite as

Ant reproductive strategies

  • Jürgen Heinze
  • Kazuki Tsuji
Review

Abstract

In contrast to what is generally believed, the reproductive strategies of ants are remarkably diverse and include such different phenomena, as wingless female and male sexuals, reproduction by mated workers, thelytokous parthenogenesis, and complete workerlessness. We review the various reproductive life histories and investigate them in the light of recent models on the evolution of dispersal strategies and multiple-queening. It appears that most deviations from “normal” colony propagation can be explained by a decreased success of dispersal and solitary founding by solitary queens in certain types of habitats. Consequently, alternative reproductive strategies are found especially in those species, in which environmental conditions or a highly specialized way of life are thought to make solitary founding costly. Among the key factors, which determine the success of reproductive strategies, appear to be spatial and temporal distribution of habitats and the availability of nest sites.

Key words

dispersal life history queen number wing polymorphism ants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adlerz, G. (1896) Myrmekologiska Studier. III.Tomognathus sublaevis Mayr.Bih. Kong. Svensk. Vet. Akad. Handl. 21: 1–76.Google Scholar
  2. Allies, A. B., A. F. G. Bourke and N. R. Franks (1986) Propaganda substances in the cuckoo antLeptothorax kutteri and the slavemakerHarpagoxenus sublaevis.J. Chem. Ecol. 12: 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aukema, B. (1991) Fecundity in relation to wing-morph of the three closely related species of themelanocephalus group of the genusCalathus (Coleoptera: Carabidae).Oecologia 87: 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baroni-Urbani, C. (1967) Le distribuzioni geografiche discontinue dei Formicidi mirmecobiotici.Arch. Bot. Biogeograf. Ital. 43: 355–365.Google Scholar
  5. Bolton, B. (1986) Apterous females and shift of dispersal strategy in theMonomorium salomonis-group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Nat. Hist. 20: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourke, A. F. G. and N. R. Franks (1991) Alternative adaptations, sympatric speciation and the evolution of parasitic, inquiline ants.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 43: 157–178.Google Scholar
  7. Bourke, A. F. G. and J. Heinze (1994) The ecology of communal breeding: the case of multiple-queen leptothoracine ants.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345: 359–372.Google Scholar
  8. Brandão, M. V. (1987) Queenlessness inMegalomyrmex (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), with a discussion on the effects of the loss of true queens in ants. pp. 111–112.In J. Eder and H. Rembold (eds.)Chemistry and biology of social insects. Peperny, München.Google Scholar
  9. Brian, M. V. and A. D. Brian (1949) Observations on the taxonomy of the antsMyrmica rubra L. andMyrmica laevinodis Nylander.Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 100: 393–409.Google Scholar
  10. Brian, M. V. and A. D. Brian (1955) On the two forms macrogyna and microgyna of the antMyrmica rubra L.Evolution 9: 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briese, D. T. (1983) Different mode sof reproductive behaviour (including a description of colony fission) in a species ofChelaner (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 30: 308–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buschinger, A. (1966) Untersuchungen anHarpagoxenus sublaevis Nyl. (Hym., Formicidae). II: Haltung und Brutaufzucht.Insectes Soc. 13: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buschinger, A. (1968) Mono- und Polygynie bei Arten der GattungLeptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 15: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buschinger, A. (1970) Neue Vorstellungen zur Evolution des Sozialparasitismus und der Dulosis bei Ameisen (Hym., Formicidae).Biol. Zbl. 89: 273–299.Google Scholar
  15. Buschinger A. (1974) Monogynie und Polygynie in Insektensozietäten. pp. 862–896.In G. H. Schmidt (ed.)Sozialpolymorphismus bei Insekten. Wiss, Verlagsges., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  16. Buschinger, A. (1975) Eine genetische Komponente im Polymorphismus der dulotischen AmeiseHarpagoxenus sublaevis.Naturwissenschaften 62: 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buschinger, A. (1978) Genetisch bedingte Entstehung geflügelter Weibchen bei der sklavenhaltenden AmeiseHarpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.) (Hym. Form.).Insectes Soc. 25: 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buschinger, A. (1990a) Regulation of worker and queen formation in ants with special reference to reproduction and colony development. pp. 37–57.In W. Engles (ed.)Social insects. An evolutionary approach to castes and reproduction Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Buschinger, A. (1990b) Sympatric speciation and radiative evolution of socially parasitic ants-Heretic hypotheses and their factual background.Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 28: 241–260.Google Scholar
  20. Buschinger, A. and A. Francoeur (1991) Queen polymorphism and functional monogyny in the ant,Leptothorax sphagnicolus Francoeur. Psyche98: 119–133.Google Scholar
  21. Buschinger, A. and J. Heinze (1992) Polymorphism of female reproductives in ants. pp. 11–23.In J. Billen (ed.)Biology and evolution of social insects. Leuven University Press, Leuven.Google Scholar
  22. Buschinger, A. and U. Winter (1976) Funktronelle Monogynie bei der GastameiseFormicoxenus nitidulus (Nyl.) (Hym., Form.).Insectes Soc. 23: 549–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cagniant, H. (1979) La parthénogenèse thélytoque et arrhénotoque chez la fourmiCataglyphis cursor Fonscolombe. Cycle biologique en élevage des colonies avec reines et des colonies sans reine.Insectes Soc. 26: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cagniant, H. (1983) La parthénogenèse thélytoque et arrhénotoque chez la fourmiCataglyphis cursor Fonscolombe (Hymenoptères Formicidae). Etude biométrique des ouvrières et de leurs potentialités reproductrices.Insectes Soc. 30: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Choe, J. C. (1995) Plurimatry: New terminology for multiple reproductives.J. Insect Behav. 8: 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cook, J. M. (1993) Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence.Heredity 71: 421–435.Google Scholar
  27. Darlington, P. J. Jr. (1943) Carabidae of mountains and islands: Data on the evolution of isolated faunas, and on atrophy of wings.Ecol. Monogr. 13: 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. den Boer, P. J. (1970) On the significance of dispersal power for populations of carabid beetles.Oecologia 4: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Denno, R. F. (1995) The evolution of dispersal polymorphisms in insects: The influence of habitats, host plants and mates.Res. Popul. Ecol. 36: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DuBois, M. (1986) A revision of the native New World species of the ant genusMonomorium (minimum group) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 53: 65–119.Google Scholar
  31. Elmes, G. W. (1978) A morphometric comparison of three closely related species ofMyrmica (Formicidae), including a new species from England.Syst. Entomol. 3: 131–145.Google Scholar
  32. Elmes G. W. (1991) Mating strategy and isolation between the two forms, macrogyna and microgyna, ofMyrmica ruginodis (Hym. Formicidae).Ecol. Entomol. 16: 411–423.Google Scholar
  33. Ezhikov, I. (1934) Individual variability and dimorphism of social insects.Am. Nat. 68: 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forder, J. C. and A. C. Marsh (1989) Social organization and reproduction inOcymyrmex foreli (Formicidae: Myrmicinae).Insectes Soc. 36: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forel, A. (1904) Ueber Polymorphismus und Variation bei Ameisen.Zool. Jb. Suppl.7: 571–586.Google Scholar
  36. Fortelius, W., P. Pamilo, R. Rosengren and L. Sundström (1987) Male size dimorphism and alternative reproductive tactics inFormica exsecta ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Ann. Zool. Fenn. 24, 45–54.Google Scholar
  37. Francoeur, A., R. Loiselle and A. Buschinger (1985) Biosystématique de la tribu Leptothoracini (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). 1. Le genreFormicoxenus dans la région holarctique.Naturaliste Can. (Rev. Ecol. Syst.) 112: 343–403.Google Scholar
  38. Fukumoto, Y., T. Abe and A. Taki (1989) A novel form of colony organization in the “queenless” antDiacamma rugosum.Physiol. Ecol. Japan 26: 55–61.Google Scholar
  39. Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I, II.J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hamilton, W. D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios.Science 156: 477–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hamilton, W. D. (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 193–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamilton, W. D. (1978) Evolution and diversity under bark. pp. 154–175.In L. A. Mound and N. Waloff (eds.)Diversity of insect fauna. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  43. Hamilton, W. D. (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. pp. 167–220.In M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum (eds.)Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Hamilton, W. D. and R. M. May (1977) Dispersal in stable habitats.Nature 269: 578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harrison, R. G. (1980) dispersal polymorphisms in insectsAnnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hashimoto Y., E. Hasegawa, and K. Yamauchi (1995) Unique habits of stomodeal trophallaxis in the ponerine antHypoponera sp.Insectes Soc. 42: 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haskins, C. P. and E. F. Haskins (1950) Notes on the biology and social behavior of the archaic ponerine ants of the genera,Myrmecia andPromyrmecia.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 43: 461–491.Google Scholar
  48. Haskins, C. P. and E. F. Haskins (1951) Notes on the method of colony foundation of the ponerine antAmblyopone australis Erichson.Am. Midl. Nat. 45: 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heinze, J. (1989) Alternative dispersal strategies in a North American ant.Naturwissenschaften 76: 477–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Heinze, J. (1991) Biochemical studies on the relationship between socially parasitic ants and their hosts.Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 19: 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heinze, J. (1992) Ecological correlates of functional monogyny and queen dominance in leptothoracine ants. pp. 25–33.In J. Billen (ed.)Biology and evolution of social insects. Leuven University Press, Leuven.Google Scholar
  52. Heinze, J. (1993) Habitat structure, dispersal strategies and queen number in two borealLeptothorax ants.Oecologia 96: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Heinze, J. (1995) Reproductive skew and genetic relatedness inLeptothorax ants.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261: 375–379.Google Scholar
  54. Heinze, J. and Buschinger, A. (1989) Queen polymorphism inLeptothorax spec. A: its genetic and ecological background (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 36: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Heinze, J. and B. Hölldobler (1993a) Queen polymorphism in an Australian weaver ant,Polyrhachis cf.doddi.Psyche 100: 83–92.Google Scholar
  56. Heinze, J. and B. Hölldobler (1993b) Fighting for a harem of queens: Physiology of reproduction inCardiocondyla male ants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 8412–8414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Heinze, J. and B. Hölldobler (1995) Thelytokous parthenogenesis and dominance hierarchies in the ponerine ant,Platythyrea punctata.Naturwissenschaften 82: 40–41.Google Scholar
  58. Heinze, J. and T. A. Smith (1990) Dominance and fertility in a functionally monogynous ant.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Heinze, J., B. Hölldobler and S. P. Cover (1992a) Queen polymorphism in the North American harvester ant,Ephebomyrmex imberbiculus.Insectes Soc. 39: 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Heinze, J., N. Lipski and B. Hölldobler (1992b) Reproductive competition in colonies of the antLeptothorax gredleri.Ethology 90: 265–278.Google Scholar
  61. Heinze, J., S. Kühnholz, K. Schilder and B. Hölldobler (1993) Behavior of ergatoid males in the ant,Cardiocondyla nuda.Insectes Soc. 40: 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Heinze, J., B. Hölldobler and C. Peeters (1994) Conflict and cooperation in ant societies.Naturwissenschaften 81: 489–497.Google Scholar
  63. Hendersen, G., R. O. Wagner and R. L. Jeanne (1989) Prairie ant longevity and mound growth.Psyche 96: 257–268.Google Scholar
  64. Heppner, J. B. (1991) Brachyptery and aptery in Lepidoptera.Trop. Lepid. 2: 11–40.Google Scholar
  65. Herbers J. M. (1993) Ecological, determinants of queen number in ants. pp. 262–293.In L. Keller (ed.)Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  66. Herre, E. A. (1993) Population structure and the evolution of virulence in nematode parasites of fig wasps.Science 259: 1442–1445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hölldobler, B. (1962) Zur Frage der Oligogynie beiCamponotus ligniperda Latr. undC. herculeanus L. (Hym., Formicidae).Z. Angew. Entomol. 39: 337–352.Google Scholar
  68. Hölldobler, B. and S. H. Bartz (1985) Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. pp. 237–257.In B. Hölldobler and M. Lindauer (eds.)Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer Ass., Sunderland.Google Scholar
  69. Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson (1977) The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution.Naturwissenschaften 64: 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hölldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson (1990)The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  71. Holliday, M. (1903) A study of some ergatogynic antsZool. Jb. Abt. Syst. 19: 293–328.Google Scholar
  72. Ito, F., and S. Higashi (1991) A linear dominance hierarchy regulating reproduction and polyethism of the queenless antPachycondyla sublaevis.Naturwissenschaften 78: 80–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ito, F. and K. Ohkawara (1994) Spermatheca size differentiation between queens and workers in primitive ants.Naturwissenschaften 81: 138–140.Google Scholar
  74. Itow, T., K. Kobayashi, M. Kubota, K. Ogata, H. T. Imai and R. H. Crozier (1984) The reproductive cycle of the queenless antPristomyrmex pungens.Insectes Soc. 31: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Janzen, D. H. (1973) The evolution of polygynous obligate acaciaants in western Mexico.J. Anim. Ecol. 42: 727–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Johnson, M. L. and M. S. Gaines (1990) Evolution of dispersal: Theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Keller, L. (1988) Evolutionary implications of polygyny in the Argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): an experimental study.Anim. Behav. 36: 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Keller, L. (1991) Queen number, mode of colony founding, and queen reproductive success in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 3: 307–316.Google Scholar
  79. Keller, L. (1993) ed.Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  80. Keller, L. and L. Passera (1989) Size and fat content in gynes in relation to the mode of colony founding in ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae).Oecologia 80: 236–240.Google Scholar
  81. Keller, L. and H. K. Reeve (1994a) Genetic variability, queen number, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera.Evolution 48: 694–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Keller, L. and H. K. Reeve (1994b) Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies.Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Keller, L. and K. G. Ross (1993) Phenotypic plasticity and “cultural transmission” on alternative social organizations in the fire antSolenopsis invicta.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 121–129.Google Scholar
  84. Kinomura, K. and K. Yamauchi, (1987) Fighting and mating behaviors of dimorphic males in the antCardiocondyla wroughtoni.J. Ethol. 5: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kutter, H. (1968) Die sozialparasitischen Ameisen der Schweiz.Neujahrsblatt der Naturforsch.Gesellschaft Zürich 113, 1–62.Google Scholar
  86. Lenoir, A. and H. Cagniant (1986) Role of worker thelytoky in colonies of the antCataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Entomol. Gener. 11: 153–157.Google Scholar
  87. Lenoir, A., L. Querard, N. Pondicq, and F. Berton (1988) Reproduction and dispersal in the antCataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Psyche 95: 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Loiselle, R. and A. Francoeur (1988) Régression du dimorphisme sexuel dans le genreFormicoxenus et polymorphisme comparé des sexes dans la famille des Formicidae (Hymenoptera).Naturaliste can. (Rev. Ecol. Syst.) 115: 367–378.Google Scholar
  89. Maschwitz, U. and H. Hänel (1985) The migrating herdsmanDolichoderus (Diabolus) cuspidatus: an ant with a novel mode of life.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17: 171–184.Google Scholar
  90. May, R. and R. M. Anderson (1983) Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 219: 281–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. McInnes, D. A. and W. R. Tschinkel (1995) Queen dimorphism and reproductive strategies in the fire antSolenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mercier, B., L. Passera and J.-P. Suzzoni (1985a) Étude de la polygynie chez la fourmiPlagiolepis pygmaea Latr. (Hym. Formicidae). I.: La fécondité des reines en condition expérimentale monogyne.Insectes Soc. 32: 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mercier, B., L. Passera and J.-P. Suzzoni (1985b) Étude de la polygynie chez la fourmiPlagiolepis pygmaea Latr. (Hym. Formicidae). II.: La fécondit* des reines en condition expérimentale polygyne.Insectes soc. 32: 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nonacs, P. (1988) Queen number in colonies of social Hymenoptera as a kin-selected adaptation.Evolution 42: 566–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nonacs, P. (1993) The effects of polygyny and colony life history on optimal sex investment. pp. 110–131. In L. Keller (ed.)Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  96. Nonacs, P. and J. E. Tobin (1992) Selfish larvae: development and the evolution of parasitic behavior, in the Hymenoptera.Evolution 46: 1605–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ohkawara, K., F. Ito and S. Higashi (1993) Production and reproductive function of intercastes inMyrmecina graminicola nipponica colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 40: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ortius, D. and J. Heinze (1995) Dynmaics and consequences of hierarchy formation in the antLeptothorax sp. A.Ethology,99: 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pamilo, P. (1991a) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. I. Sex allocation.Am. Nat. 137: 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Pamilo, P. (1991b) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. I. Number of reproductive individuals.Am. Nat. 138: 412–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pamilo, P. (1991c) Life span in the antFormica exsecta.Insectes Soc. 38: 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Passera, L. (1964) Données biologiques sur la fourmi parasitePlagiolepis xene Stärcke.Insectes Soc. 11: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Passera, L. and L. Keller (1990) Loss of mating flight and shift in the pattern of carbohydrate storage in sexuals of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. comp. Physiol. B 160: 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Passera, L. and L. Keller (1994) Mate availability and male dispersal in the Argentine antLinepithema humile (Mayr) (=Iridomyrmex humilis).Anim. Behav. 48: 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Peeters, C. (1990) Reproductive allocation in ponerine ants with or without queens. pp. 357–358.In G. K. Veeresh, B. Mallik and C. A. Viraktamath (eds.)Social insects and the environment. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  106. Peeters, C. (1991a) Ergatoid queens and intercastes in ants: two distinct forms which look morphologically intermediate between workers and winged queens.Insectes Soc. 38: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Peeters, C. (1991b) The occurrence of sexual reproduction among ant workers.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44: 141–152.Google Scholar
  108. Peeters, C. (1993) Monogyny and polygyny in ponerine ants with or without queens. pp. 234–261.In L. Keller (ed.)Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  109. Peeters, C. Morphologically “primitive” ants: comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen-worker dimorphism.In J. Choe and B. Crespi (eds.)Social competition and cooperation in insects and arachnids: Vol. II. Evolution of sociality. Princeton University Press, Princeton. (in press)Google Scholar
  110. Peeters, C. and R. Crewe (1985) Worker reproduction in the ponerine antOphthalmopone berthoudi—an alternative form of eusocial organization.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 29–37.Google Scholar
  111. Peeters, C. and S. Higashi (1989) Reproductive dominance controlled by mutilation in the queenless antDiacamma australe.Naturwissenschaften 76: 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Peeters, C. and B. Hölldobler. Reproductive competition between queens and their mated workers: the complex life history of an ant with limited caste dimorphism.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (in press)Google Scholar
  113. Peeters, C., J. Billen and B. Hölldobler (1992) Alternative dominance mechanisms regulating monogyny in the queenless ant genusDiacamma.Naturwissenschaften 79: 572–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Peeters, C., B. Hölldobler, M. Moffett and T. M. Musthak-Ali (1994) “Wall-papering” and elaborate nest architecture in the ponerine antHarpegnathos saltator, Insectes Soc. 41: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Porter, S. D. and C. D. Jorgensen (1981) Foragers of the harvester ant,Pogonomyrmex owyheei: a disposable caste?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Reeve, H. K. and F. L. W. Ratnieks (1993) Queen-queen conflicts in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. pp. 45–85.In L. Keller (ed.)Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  117. Roff, D. A. (1986) The evolution of wing dimorphism in insects.Evolution 40: 1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Roff, D. A. (1992) The evolution of alternative life histories: quantitative genetics and the evolution of wing dimorphism in insects.Kotaigun-Seitai-Gakkai-Kaihô (Bull. Soc. Popul. Ecol.) 49: 28–35.Google Scholar
  119. Roff, D. A. (1994a) Habitat persistence and the evolution of wing dimorphism in insects.Am. Nat. 144: 772–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Roff, D. A. (1994b) The evolution of flightlessness: is history important?Evol. Ecol.,8: 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rosengren, R. and P. Pamilo (1983) The evolution of polygyny and polydomy in mound-buildingFormica ants.Acta Entomol. Fenn. 42: 65–77.Google Scholar
  122. Rosengren, R., L. Sundström and W. Fortelius (1993) Monogyny and polygyny inFormica ants: the results of alternative dispersal tactics. pp. 308–333.In L. Keller (ed.)Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  123. Ross, K. G. and D. D. Shoemaker (1993) An unusual pattern of gene flow between the two social forms of the fire antSolenopsis invicta.Evolution 47: 1595–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Schilder, K., J. Heinze, and B. Hölldobler (1995) Kolonie- und Populationsstruktur der theyltok parthenogenetischen AmeisePlatythyrea punctata (F. Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 88.1: 47.Google Scholar
  125. Schmid-Hempel, P. (1984) Individually different foraging methods in the desert antCataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Seifert, B. (1991) The phenotypes of theFormica rufa complex in East Germany.Abh. Ber. Naturkundemus. Görlitz 65: 1–27.Google Scholar
  127. Seifert, B. (1993) Taxonomic description ofMyrmica microrubra n. sp.—a social parasitic ant so far known as the microgyne ofMyrmica rubra (L.).Abh. Ber. Naturkundemus. Görlitz 67: 9–12.Google Scholar
  128. Southwood, T. R. E. (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 337–365.Google Scholar
  129. Stille, M. and B. Stille (1991) Intra- and inter-nest variation in mitochondrial DNA in the polygynous antLeptothorax acervorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 39: 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Stouthamer, R., R. F. Luck, and W. D. Hamilton (1990) Antibiotics cause parthenogeneticTrichogramma (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) to revert to sex.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2424–2427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Stouthamer, R., J. A. J. Breeuwer, R. F. Luck and J. H. Werren (1993) Molecular identification of microorganisms associated with parthenogenesis.Nature 361: 66–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Stuart, R. J., A. Francoeur and R. Loiselle (1987) Lethal fighting among dimorphic males of the ant,Cardiocondyla wroughtoni.Naturwissenschaften 74: 548–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sundström, L. (1995) Dispersal polymorphism and physiological condition of males and females in the antFormica truncorum.Behav. Ecol. 6: 132–139.Google Scholar
  134. Taylor, R. W. (1978)Nothomyrmecia macrops: A living-fossil ant rediscovered.Science 201: 979–985.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Tschinkel, W. R. and D. F. Howard (1978) Queen replacement in orphaned colonies of the fire ant,Solenopsis invicta.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Tinaut, A. and J. Heinze (1992) Wing reduction in ant queens from arid habitats,Naturwissenschaften 79: 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Tsuji, K. (1988a) Nest relocations in the Japanese queenless antPristomyrmex pungens Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Insectes Soc. 35: 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Tsuji, K. (1988b) Obligate parthenogenesis and reproductive division of labor in the Japanese queenless antPristomyrmex pungens. Comparison of intranidal and extranidal workers.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23: 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tsuji, K. (1990) Reproductive division of labour related to age in the Japanese queenless ant,Pristomyrmex pungens.Anim. Behav. 39: 843–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Tsuji, K. (1995) Reproductive conflicts and levels of selection in the parthenogenetic ant,Pristomyrmex pungens: contextual analysis and partitioning of covariance.Am. Nat. 146: 586–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Tsuji, K. and N. Tsuji. Evolution of life history stategies in ants: variation in queen number and mode of colony foudning.Oikos (in press)Google Scholar
  142. Tsuji, K. and K. Yamauchi (1994) Colony level sex allocation in a polygynous and polydomous ant.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34: 157–167.Google Scholar
  143. Tsuji, K. and K. Yamauchi (1995) Production of females by parthenogenesis in the ant,Cerapachys biroi.Insectes Soc. 42: 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Tsuji, N., K. Yamauchi and N. Yamamura (1994) A mathematical model for wing dimorphism in maleCardiocondyla ants.J. Ethol. 12: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Vargo, E. L. and D. J. C. Fletcher (1989) On the relationship between queen number and fecundity in polygyne colonies of the fire antSolenopsis invicta.Physiol. Entomol. 14: 223–232.Google Scholar
  146. Vehrencamp, S. L. (1983) Optimal degree of skew in cooperative societies.Amer. Zool. 23: 327–335.Google Scholar
  147. Viehmeyer, H. (1908) Zur Koloniegründung der parasitischen Ameisen.Biol. Centralbl. 28: 18–32Google Scholar
  148. Villet, M. H. (1989) A syndrome leading to ergatoid queens in ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Nat. Hist. 23: 825–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Villet, M. H. (1991) Colony foundation inPlectroctena mandibularis F. Smith, and the evolution of ergatoid queens inPlectroctena (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Nat. Hist. 25: 979–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Villet, M. H. (1992) The social biology ofHagensia havilandi (Forel 1901) (Hymenoptera Formicidae), and the origin of queenlessness in ponerine ants.Trop. Zool. 5: 195–206.Google Scholar
  151. Villet, M. H., R. M. Crewe and F. D. Duncan (1991) Evolutionary trends in the reproductive biology of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),J. Nat. Hist. 25: 1603–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wagner, D. L. and J. K. Liebherr (1992) Flightlessness in insects.Trends. Ecol. Evol. 7: 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Ward, P. S. (1983) Genetic relatedness and colony organization in a species complex of ponerine ants. I. Phenotypic and genotypic composition of colonies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Wasmann, E. (1890) Ueber die verschiedenen Zwischenformen von Weibchen und Arbeiterinnen bei Ameisen.Stettin Ent. Zeitg. 51: 300–309.Google Scholar
  155. Wasmann, E. (1897) Ueber ergatoide Weibchen und Pseudogynen bei Ameisen.Zool. Anz. 20: 251–253.Google Scholar
  156. Wheeler, W. M. (1910)Ants. Their structure, development and behavior, Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  157. Wheeler, W. M. (1917) The phylogenetic development of subapterous and apterous castes in the Formicidae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 3: 109–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wheeler, W. M. (1933)Colony-founding among ants, with an account of some primitive Australian species. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  159. Wheeler, W. M. (1937)Mosdics and other anomalies among ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  160. Wilson, E. O. (1971)The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  161. Wilson, E. O. (1974) The population consequences of polygyny in the antLeptothorax curvispinosus.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 781–786.Google Scholar
  162. Winter, U. and A. Buschinger (1986) Genetically mediated queen polymorphism and caste determination in the slave-making ant,Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Entomol. Gener. 11: 125–137.Google Scholar
  163. Yamauchi, K. and K. Ogata (1995) Social structure and reproductive systems of tramp versus endemic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Ryukyu Islands.Pac. Sci. 49: 55–68.Google Scholar
  164. Yamauchi, K., T. Furukawa, K. Kinomura, H. Takamine and K. Tsuji (1991) Secondary polygyny by inbred wingless sexuals in the dolichoderine antTechnomyrmex albipes.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Zaayer, P. M. (1967) Paarung und Koloniegründung vonPolyergus rufescens Latr. im Kunstnest (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Z. Arbeitsgem. Österr. Entomol. 19: 1–9.Google Scholar
  166. Zera, A. J. (1981) Genetic structure of two waterstriders (Gerridae: Hemiptera) with differing degrees of winglessness.Evolution 35: 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Zera, A. J. and S. Mole (1995) The physiological costs of flight capability in wing-dimorphic crickets.Res. Popul. Ecol. 36: 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Society of Population Ecology 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Heinze
    • 1
  • Kazuki Tsuji
    • 1
  1. 1.LS Verhaltensphysiologie und SoziobiologieTheodor-Boveri-Institut (Biozentrum der Universität)WürzburgF.R. Germany

Personalised recommendations