Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of mutualistic symbiosis: A differential equation model

  • Special Feature 2
  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract

In geological history, rapid speciation, called adaptive radiation, has occurred repeatedly. The origins of such newly developing taxa often evolved from the symbiosis of different species. Mutualistic symbioses are generally considered to evolve from parasitic relationships. As well as the previous model of host population with discrete generations, a differential equation model of host population with overlapping generations shows that vertical transmission, defined as the direct transfer of infection from a parent host to its progeny, is an important factor which can stimulate reduction of parasite virulence. Evolution of the vertical transmission rate from both points of view, the parasite and the host, is analyzed. There is a critical level of the rate, below which an evolutionary conflict arises (the parasite would want an increase in the rate while the host would not), and above which both species would correspond to increase the rate. Therefore, once the parasite dominates the evolutionary race so as to overcome this critical level, one-way evolution begins toward a highly mutualistic relationship with a high vertical transmission rate, possibly creating a new organism through symbiosis with perfect vertical transmission. Changes in other parameters may decrease the critical level, initiating one-way evolution. However, changes in traits, probably developed through a long interrelationship in parasitism, do not necessarily induce the evolution of mutualism. Establishment of the ability to make use of metabolic and digestive wastes from the partner certainly facilitates the evolution of mutualism, while improvements in reproductive efficiency of parasites and reduction of negative effects from exploitation in hosts on the contrary disturb mutualism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bremermann, H. J. and J. Pickering (1983) A game-theoretic model of parasitic virulence.Journal of Theoretical Biology 100: 411–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breznak, J. A. (1975) Symbiotic relationships between termites and their intestinal microbiota.Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 29: 559–580.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, P. (1965)Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. Wiley Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, P. W. (1987) Transmission modes and evolution of the parasite-mutualism continuum.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 503 (Endocytobiology III): 295–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, P. W. (1994)Evolution of infectious disease. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, F. (1965) Myxoma virus andOryctolagus cuniculus. pp. 485–501.In H. G. Baker and A. L. Stebbins (eds.)The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J. G. W. and M. D. Summers (1991) Polydnavirus DNA is integrated in the DNA of its parasitoid wasp host.Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88: 9770–9774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, H. (1988)Symbiosis and evolution. Baihukan, Tokyo. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, K. W. (1972) Development of cellular dependence in infective organisms: microsurgical studies in amoebas.Science 176: 1122–1123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. W., D. Kovac, A. Schellerich and U. Maschwitz (1992) Mealybug-carrying by swarming queens of a southeast Asian bamboo-inhabiting ant.Naturwissenschaften 79: 422–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1993)Symbiosis in cell evolution. 2nd ed. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. and R. Anderson (1983) Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts.Proceeding of Royal Society, London, Series B 219: 281–313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. and M. Nowak (1995) Coinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence.Proceeding of Royal Society, London, Series B 261: 209–215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts,Journal of Theoretical Biology 47: 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Smith, J. (1982)Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1989) Generating novelty by symbiosis.Nature 341: 284–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, G. and P. Gilson (1995) Something borrowed, something green: lateral transfer of chloroplasts by secondary endosymbiosis.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. (1991) The evolution of viruses. Competition between horizontal and vertical transmission of mobile genes.Journal of Theoretical Biology 150: 339–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. W. (1991) The web of life: Development over 3.8 billion years of trophic relationships. pp. 262–272.In L. Margulis and R. Fester (eds.)Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation. The MIT press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. (1975) Evolution of marine symbiosis—A simple cost-benefit model.Ecology 56: 1201–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, A. and Y. Iwasa (1991) Optimal growth schedule of pathogens within a host: switching between lytic and latent cycles.Theoretical Population Biology 39: 201–239.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stolts, D. B. and S. B. Vinson (1979) Viruses and parasitism in insects.Advances in Virus Research 24: 125–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura, N. (1987) Evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) models of copulation and mate guarding. pp. 197–211.In Y. Ito, J. L. Brown and J. Kikkawa (eds.)Animal societies, theories and facts. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura, N. (1993) Vertical transmission and evolution of mutualism from parasitism.Theoretical Population Biology 44: 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura, N. (1996) Diversity and evolution of symbiotic interaction.In T. Abe, S. A. Levin and M. Higashi (eds.)Biodiversity: an ecological perspective. Springer, New York. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura, N. and M. Higashi (1992) An evolutionary theory of conflict resolution between relatives: altruism, manipulation, compromise.Evolution 46: 1236–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamura, N. Evolution of mutualistic symbiosis: A differential equation model. Res Popul Ecol 38, 211–218 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515729

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515729

Key words

Navigation