Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 84–96 | Cite as

Mining pattern of the honeysuckle leaf-minerPhytomyza lonicerae

  • Makoto Katô


The mining pattern of the honeysuckle leaf-minerPhytomyza lonicerae which feeds onLonicera gracilipes was analyzed with special reference to the avoidance of parasitoids' attacks. The leaf-miner makes the linear mine with branches and crosses by turning and branching, off the backtracking mine. Both average numbers of turnings and branchings were about 4. The speed of mining was 1.5 times faster in backtracking than in advancing. The mine width increased as the mining larva grew and total volume of consumed plant tissue was nearly constant independent of variability of the number of turnings and other characteristics of the mine. The majority of larval mortality were due to attacks by parasitoid wasps (Chrysochairs pentheus andDiglyphus minoeus), which locate the present position of leaf-miners, by tracing mine tracks, and wasps attack leaf-miners at a higher rate in backtracking than in advancing. The adaptive significance of branching and crossing by leaf-miners was discussed in terms of the reduction of parasitoids' attacks.


Mining Pattern Mortality Factor Parasitoid Wasp Mine Stage Cumulative Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Askew, R. R. (1968) A survey of leaf-miners and their parasites onLaburnum.Trans. R. Ent. Soc. London 120: 1–37.Google Scholar
  2. Askew, R. R. andM. R. Shaw (1979) Mortality factors affecting the leaf-mining stages ofPhyllonorycter (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) on oak and birch. 1. Analysis of the mortality factors.Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 67: 31–49.Google Scholar
  3. Inoue, T. (1983) Foraging strategy of a non-omniscient predator in a changing environment. (1) Model with a data window and absolute criterion.Res. Popul. Ecol. 25: 81–104.Google Scholar
  4. Hering, E. M. (1951)Biology of the leaf-miners. Uitgeverji Dr. W. Junk. Hague.Google Scholar
  5. Hassell, M. P. andT. R. E. Southwood (1978) Foraging strategies of insects.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Murai, M. (1974) Studies, on the interference among larvae of theCitrus leaf-miner,Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lepidoptera: Phyllocnistidae).Res. Popul. Ecol. 16: 80–111.Google Scholar
  7. Papentin, F. (1973) A darwinian evolutionary system. III. Experiments on the evolution of feeding patterns.J. Theor. Biol. 39: 431–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Price, P. W. (1975) Reproductive strategies of parasitoids. InP. W. Price (ed)Evolutionary strategies of parasitic insects and mites. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Raup, D. M. andA. Seilacher (1969), Fossil foraging behavior: Computer simulation.Sci. 166: 994–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sasakawa, M. (1961) A study of Japanese Agromyzidae (Diptera). 2Pacif. Insects 3: 307–472.Google Scholar
  11. Spencer, K. A. (1976)Fauna entomologica Scandinavica. vol. 5. The Agromyzidae (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Scandinvian Science Press LTD. Klampenborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  12. Sugimoto, T. (1977) Ecological studies on the relationship between theRanunculus leaf-mining fly,Phytomyza ranunculi Schrank (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and its parasiteKratochivilina sp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from the viewpoint of spatial structure. 1. Analysis of searching and attacking behaviors of the parasite.Appl. Ent. Zool. 12(2): 83–103.Google Scholar
  13. Trägardh, I. (1909) Zur Kenntnis vonPhytomyza, Xylostei Kltb. eine inLonicera Symphoricarpus minierende Fliege.Z. Wiss. Insekt-Biol. 5: 301–304.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makoto Katô
    • 1
  1. 1.Entomological Laboratory, College of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations