Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 353–362 | Cite as

Population dynamics of houseflies,Musca domestica, on experimentally accumulated refuse

  • Chobei Imai


The population dynamics of the housefly,Musca domestica, on patchy and unstable habitats consisting of refuse was investigated at a waste disposal site by using sticky flypaper and mark-release-recapture technique (Jolly-Seber's method). The newly disposed garbage was favorable for breeding of the flies for about one month after being disposed, while a mixture of garbage and ash from incinerated refuse was less favorable. On the garbage under favorable conditions, the rates of population increase was 1.25–2.82 per day, and approximately 1300–1500 flies were produced per square meter within the available period of one month. The rapid decrease in the fly density was observed just after the appearance of high density peaks. The mark-release-recapture study suggested that this rapid decrease would be mainly due to the density-dependent emigration of adult flies from the patchy habitats. The emigration was also activated when the time after garbage disposition became long.


Musca Domestica Waste Disposal Site Unfavorable Habitat Unstable Habitat High Emigration Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Greenberg, B. andA. A. Bornstein (1964) Fly dispersion from a rural mexican slaughterhouse.Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 13: 881–886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jolly, G. M. (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration—stochastic model.Biometrika 52: 225–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kurashige, Y. (1968) Seasonal abundance of the flies collected in Mine, Utsunomiya City.Utsunomiya Daigaku Kyoiku-gakubu Kiyo 18: 66–76.Google Scholar
  4. LaBrecque, G. C., D. W. Meifert andD. E. Weidhaas (1972) Dynamics of house fly and stable fly populations.Fla. Entomol. 55: 101–106.Google Scholar
  5. Lure, A. A. andN. F. Zakharova (1974) Determination of the absolute population density of house flies,Musca domestica on a pig breeding farm by radio isotope labeling.Med. Parazitol. Bolezni 43: 171–176.Google Scholar
  6. Morisita, M. (1965) The fitting of the logistic equation to the rate of increase of population density.Res. Popul. Ecol. 7: 52–55.Google Scholar
  7. Oda, T. (1966) Studies on the dispersal of the house flyMusca domestica vicina by mark-and-release method.Endemic Dis. Bull. Nagasaki Univ. 8: 136–144.Google Scholar
  8. Ogata, K. (1960) Seasonal change of the fly fauna in a dwelling house in Kawasaki City.Jap. J. Sanit. Zool. 11: 17–21.Google Scholar
  9. Ogata, K., N. Nagai, N. Koshimizu, M. Kato andA. Wada (1960) Release studies on the dispersion of the house flies and the blow flies in the suburban area of Kawasaki City, Japan.Jap. J. Sanit. Zool. 11: 181–188.Google Scholar
  10. Pospisil, Y. andY. Bogac (1982) Comparison of methods for estimating population density of the house flyMusca domestica Diptera Muscidae at cattle farms.Sov. J. Ecol. 13: 282–286.Google Scholar
  11. Sakai, K., T. Narise, Y. Hiraizumi andS. Iyama (1958) Studies on competition in plants and animals. Experimental studies on migration inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 12: 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saliba, L. J., M. Z. Lucia, J. E. H. Grose andE. G. Harris (1977) Observations on flies found on livestock farms in Malta II—fly population studies.Misc. Rep. Centre for Overseas Pest Research No. 35, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Seber, G. A. F. (1973)The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  14. Suenaga, O. (1958) Ecological studies of flies 1. On the amount of larvae of housefly and stablefly breeding out from animal manure.Nagasaki Med. J. 33: 124–133.Google Scholar
  15. Wada, Y. andT. Oda (1963) On the range and the number in the dispersal of the housefly,Musca domestica vicina, around hog house.Endemic Dis. Bull. Nagasaki Univ. 2: 116–122.Google Scholar
  16. Weidhaas, D. E. andG. C. LaBrecque (1970) Studies on the population dynamics of the housefly,Musca domestica L.Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 43: 721–725.Google Scholar
  17. West, L. S. (1951)The housefly. Comstock, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chobei Imai
    • 1
  1. 1.Osaka City Institute of Public Health and Environmental SciencesOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations