Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 203–216 | Cite as

Niche modification and stability of competitive systems. II. Persistence of interspecific competitive systems with parasitoid wasps

  • Masakazu Shimada
Article

Summary

Effects of niche shift in ecological time scale on the population dynamics of competing species were studied in the experimental populations of two parasitoid wasp species,Anisopteromalus calandrae andHeterospilus prosopidis (both are solitary parasites), on a host, the azuki bean weevil,Callosobruchus chinensis. Four resource conditions were set up with combination of kind of bean (azuki or black eye), and host distribution (uniform or clumped). In each resource condition, four developmental stages of hosts were provided as a resource spectrum for parasitoid wasps.

Population dynamics of the two wasp populations were investigated in each resource condition in Multi-Generation Competitive Systems (MGCS), in which fresh hosts of four developmental stages were periodically introduced and were parasitized competitively by the two wasp species. Competitive coexistence of both wasps occurred in the azuki-clumped condition, where the peaks of the resource utilization curves separated in the two species; pupae inA. calandrae and the early or late fourth instar inH. prosopidis, A. calandrae was eliminated in the azuki-uniform condition andH. prosopidis went extinct in two black eye conditions irrespective of host distributions. The degrees of overlap of the resource utilization patterns of the two wasp species during population dynamics were not significantly different among resource conditions irrespective of the results of coexistence or extinction. Even in the azuki-clumped condition, however, extinction ofA. calandrae was observed when resource partitioning could not be realized with only the late fourth instar larvae available to wasps. Further analytical experiments showed that parasitizing ability ofA. calandrae increased with host density per bean with azuki beans, butA. calandrae could express higher parasitizing ability with black eye beans thanH. prosopidis irrespective of host density per bean.

The flexibility in parasitizing ability byA. calandrae for various host stages under different resource conditions was thought to be the major factor in determining the competitive coexistence or the extinction of either species under different resource conditions. The present experiments also suggested that different second-best host stages between competitors could be a major contributing factor to competitive coexistence.

Keywords

Resource Condition Host Density Fourth Instar Parasitoid Wasp Azuki Bean 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, P. (1983) The theory of limiting similarity.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christiansen, F. B. andT. M. Fenchel (1977)Theories of populations in biological communities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Colwell, R. K. andD. J. Futuyma (1971) On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap.Ecology 52: 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunham, A. E. (1983) Realized niche overlap, resource abundance, and intensity of interspecific competition. 261–280. InR. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka andT. W. Schoener (eds)Lizard ecology: studies of a model organism. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Fujii, K. (1983) Resource dependent stability in an experimental laboratory resource-herbivore-carnivore system.Res. Popul. Ecol. Suppl.3: 15–26.Google Scholar
  6. Hutchinson, G. E. (1948) Circular causal systems in ecology.Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 50: 221–246.Google Scholar
  7. Kariya, H. andM. Kurosawa (1939) Studies on application of a natural enemy to the azuki bean weevil.Noji-Kairyo-Shiryo 137: 89–90 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  8. Kistler, R. D. (1979) A simple host-parasitoid system: an examination of factors contributing to stability. Thesis for MS, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
  9. Lawlor, L. (1980) Overlap, similarity, and competition coefficients.Ecology 61: 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levins, R. (1968)Evolution in changing environments Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  11. MacArthur, R. H. (1972)Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  12. MacArthur, R. H. andR. Levins (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species.Amer. Natur. 101: 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. May, R. M. (1974)Stability and complexity in model ecosystems (2nd ed.). Princeton Univ. Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. May, R. M. (1981) Models for two interacting populations. 78–104. InR. M. May (ed)Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Mueller, L. D. andF. J. Ayala (1981) Dynamics of single species population growth: experimental and statistical analysis.Theor. Popul. Biol. 20: 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Okamoto, K. (1971a) The synchronization of the life cycles betweenCallosobruchus chinensis (L.) and its parasiteAnisopteromalus calandrae (Howard).Jap. J. Ecol. 20: 233–237 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  17. Okamoto, K. (1971b) The reproduction curve of host in host-parasite interacting system and parasite free system.Jap. J. Ecol. 21: 197–203 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  18. Okamoto, K. (1972) The synchronization of the life cycle betweenCallosobruchus chinensis (L.) and its parasite,Anisopteromalus calandrae (Howard) II. The relationship between the development of the parasite and the developmental stage of the host.Jap. J. Ecol. 22: 238–244 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  19. Pianka, E. R. (1973) The structure of lizard communities.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pianka, E. R. (1974) Niche overlap and diffuse competition.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71: 2141–2145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pianka, E. R. (1978)Evolutionary ecology (2nd ed.). Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Pianka, E. R. (1981) Competition and niche theory. 167–196. InR. M. May (ed)Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Schoener, T. W. (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition.Amer. Sci. 70: 586–595.Google Scholar
  24. Shimada, M. andK. Fujii (1985) Niche modification and stability of competitive systems. I. Niche modification process.Res. Popul. Ecol. 27: 185–201.Google Scholar
  25. Sokal, R. R. andF. J. Rohlf (1969)Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  26. Townsend, C. R. andA. G. Hildrew (1979) Resource partitioning by two freshwater invertebrate predators with contrasting foraging strategies.J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 909–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner, M. andG. A. Polis (1979) Patterns of coexistence in a guild of raptorial spiders.J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 509–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Utida, S. (1943) Host-parasite interaction in the experimental population of the azuki bean weevil,Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). I. The effect of density of parasite population on the growth of the host population and also of the parasite population.Oyo-Kontyu 4: 117–128 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  29. Utida, S. (1944) Host-parasite interaction in the experimental population of the azuki bean weevil,Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) II. The effect of density of parasite population on the growth of the host population and also of the parasite population II.Oyo-Dobutsu 15: 2–18 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  30. Utida, S. (1948) Host-parasite interaction in the experimental population of the azuki bean weevil,Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) IV. The effect of host density on the growth of host and parasite populations II.Oyo-Kontyu 4: 164–174 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  31. Utida, S. (1953) Population fluctuation in the system of host-parasite interaction.Res. Popul. Ecol. 2: 22–46 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  32. Utida, S. (1955) Population fluctuation in the system of interaction between a host and its two species parasite. Experimental studies on symparasitism. III.Oyo-Kontyu 11: 43–48 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  33. Utida, S. (1957) Population fluctuation, an experimental and theoretical approach.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22: 139–151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Population Ecology 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masakazu Shimada
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Biological SciencesUniversity of TsukubaIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations