Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of combustion and low beta counting methods for the determination of low levels of14C activity in animal tissue

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low β-counting was compared to combustion and liquid scintillation counting for detection of low levels of14C activity in animal tissues. In two separate experiments tissues from sheep and from pigs were analyzed. The first experiment utilized tissues from sheep into which a known amount of14C radioactivity was added. Combustion analysis gave somewhat higher recovery than low β-analysis, 92.8% compared to 85.7%. Statistical analysis indicated that the greatest source of random variation was in sampling. In the second experiment tissues from pigs given a14C labeled drug were analyzed. Sampling was again the greatest source of random error, however, it was greatly reduced over that in the first experiment. This was attributed to higher levels of radioactivity or to more homogeneous incorporation of radioactivity into tissues. The analytical performance of the two methods was essentially the same and a decision as to the best method for tissue residue studies is dependent on other considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. H. Peterson,Poultry Sci., 47 (1969) 1245.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. Hoff, M. H. Fisher, R. J. Bochis, A. Susi, F. Wabsmunski, J. R. Egerton, J. J. Yakstis, A. C. Cuckler, W. C. Campbell,Experientia, 26 (1970) 550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. I. Peterson,Anal. Biochem., 31 (1969) 204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. W. Snedecor, W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. R. Tyler, A. R. Reich, C. Rosenblum, Organic Scintillators and Liquid Scintillation Counting (D. L. Horrocks, C. T. Peng, Eds), Academic Press, New York, 1971, p. 869.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. J. Tocco, J. R. Egerton, W. Bowers, V. W. Christensen, C. Rosenblum,J. Pharm. Expt. Ther., 149 (1965) 263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. L. Wilson,Analyst, 87 (1961) 72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tyler, T.R., Chapin, L.R., Alvaro, R.F. et al. A comparison of combustion and low beta counting methods for the determination of low levels of14C activity in animal tissue. J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 475–482 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515340

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515340

Keywords

Navigation