Skip to main content
Log in

Differential diet breadths and species coexistence in leafroller-hunting eumenid wasps

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

There are, at least, three possible ways in which similar species coexist; resource partitioning, interference competition, and exploitation competition. Here, I investigated which way contributed to the coexistence of leafroller-hunting eumenid wasp species. Resource partitioning and, in addition, differential diet breadths proved to promote species coexistence in this case.

First, I analyze the prey records and diet overlap of four eumenid species in a local area. The larger two eumenids hunted similar-sized prey items and had similar potential taxonomic prey uses. But the diet breadth of the subsocial eumenid was much wider than that of the solitary one. As a result, the diet overlap between the two large eumenids decreased. This was because the solitary eumenid attend repeatedly to the same hunting site inhabited by one abundant prey species, while the subsocial one made random hunting. On the other hand, the two medium-sized eumenids partitioned resources according to prey size.

Secondly, I related these results to prey choice by several other species of eumenid obtained from literature sources. Ten Japanese common eumenids were divided into four groups according to their prey size. In each of the four groups, 2 to 3 wasp species differentiated the habitat (1 group) or coexisted by means of differential diet breadths (parallel with differential sociality, 2 groups).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson, D. W. (1977) Foraging ecology and community organization in desert seed-eating ants.Ecology 58: 725–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. E. (1970) Ecological-behavioral studies of the wasps of Jackson Hole, Wyoming.Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 140: 451–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., and R. H. MacArthur. (1959) On the theoretical significance of aggressive neglect in intraspecific competition.Amer. Natur. 93: 133–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itino, T. (1986) Comparison of life tables between the solitary eumenid waspAnterhynchium flavomarginatum and the subsocial eumenid waspOrancistrocerus drewseni to evaluate the adaptive significance of maternal care.Res. Popul. Ecol. 28: 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itino, T. (1988) The spatial patterns of parasitism of eumenid wasps,Anterhynchium flavomarginatum andOrancistrocerus drewseni by the miltogrammine flyAmobia distorta.Res. Popul. Ecol. 30: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, K. (1938) Habits of eight species of Eumenidae (Rhynchium, Lionotus, andSymmorphus) in Japan.Mushi 11: 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, K. (1975)Field notes of a naturalist. Asahi-sinbun-sya, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, K. (1976)Evolution of instinct: comparative ethology of Hymenoptera Amerind Publishing Company, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, K. (1979)Fifty year field notes of an entomologist. Vol. 3. Asahi-sinbun-sya, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, K. (1980)Fifty year field notes of an entomologist. Vol. 4. Asahi-sinbun-sya, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K. and S. P. Hubbell. (1974) Aggression and competition among stingless bees: field studies.Ecology 55: 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K. and S. P. Hubbell. (1975) Contrasting foraging strategies and coexistence of two bee species on a single resource.Ecology 56: 1398–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., and R. Levins. (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species.Amer. Natur. 101: 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M., and R. H. MacArthur. (1972) Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69: 1109–1113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. (1967) Pattern and process in competition.Adv. Ecol. Res. 4: 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, K. M. and H. E. Evans. (1982) Patterns of prey use in four sympatric species ofPhilanthus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) with a review of prey selection in the genus.Journal of Natural History 16: 791–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, R. H. (1975) Coexistence of sparrows: a test of community theory.Science 189: 474–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, W. M., D. B. Jensen, D. E. Hobbs, J. Gurevitch, J. R. Todd and M. V. Schaffer. (1979) Competition, foraging energetics, and the cost of sociality in three species of bees.Ecology 60: 976–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. (1977) Species packing and niche complementarity in three sunfishes.Amer. Natur. 111: 553–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane, Sk. (1990) A revision of the Japanese Eumenidae (Hymenoptera, Vespoidea).Insecta Matsumurana New Series 43: 1–189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution to the ecological studies of the eumenid wasps. III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Itino, T. Differential diet breadths and species coexistence in leafroller-hunting eumenid wasps. Res Popul Ecol 34, 203–211 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513531

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513531

Keywords

Navigation