Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity of foetal magnetocardiograms versus gestation week

  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foetal magnetocardiograms (FMCGs) were measured using a ninechannel SQUID system equipped with first-order gradiometers (60 mm baseline, 20 mm diameter). The system was installed in a magnetically shielded room in a hospital. The white noise level was less than\(10 fT/\sqrt {Hz} \), and FMCGs above 1 pT were detected. These results and the depth to the foetal heart were used to estimate the current dipole. The relationship between the current dipole (Q) and the gestation week (G) was calculated and the average performance was determined as Q=18G −295. By using the estimated foetal current dipole, the measurement limit (average value) between depth and gestation weeks was determined. When the depth from the pickup coil to the foetal heart is 50, 60, 70 and 80 mm, the first detectable gestation weeks of FMCGs above 1 pT measured by a first-order gradiometer with 60 mm baseline were determined at 21, 23, 26, and 30 weeks respectively, and the detectable gestation weeks in the case of a 30 mm baseline were determined at 22, 26, 30 and 36 weeks respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Kariniemi, V., Ahopelto, J., Karp, P. J., andKatila, T. E. (1974): ‘The foetal magnetocardiogram’,J. Perinat. Med.,2, pp. 214–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariniemi, V., andHukkinen, K. (1977): ‘Quantification of foetal heart rate variability by magnetocardiography and direct electrocardiography’,Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,128, pp. 526–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassi, D., andLewis, M. J. (1995): ‘Power spectral analysis of the foetal magnetocardiogram’,Physiol. Meas.,16, pp. 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsukada, K., Haruta, Y., Adachi, A., Ogata, H., Komuro, T., Itoh, T., Kandori, A., Noda, Y., Terada, Y., andMitusi, T. (1995): ‘Multichannel SQUID system detecting tangential components of the cardiac magnetic field’,Rev. Sci. Instrum.,66, (10), pp. 5085–5091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakai, T. R., Wang, M., Leuthold, C. A., andMartin, B. C. (1995): ‘Foetal magnetocardiogram amplitude oscillations associated with respiratory sinus arrhythmia’,Physiol. Meas.,16, pp. 49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakai, T. R., Wang, M., andMartin, B. C. (1994): ‘Spatiotemporal properties of the foetal magnetocardiogram’,Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,170 (3), pp. 770–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S. J., andKaufman, L. (1981): ‘Biomgnetism’,J. Magn. Magn. Mater.,22, pp. 129–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kandori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kandori, A., Miyashita, T., Tsukada, K. et al. Sensitivity of foetal magnetocardiograms versus gestation week. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37, 545–548 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513346

Keywords

Navigation