Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of three maximum likelihood models for stage-frequency data

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

A comparison has been made between the estimates obtained from maximum likelihood estimation of gamma, inverse normal, and normal distribution models for stage-frequency data. Results have been compared for six of sets of test data, and from many sets of simulated data. It is concluded that (1) some estimates may differ substantially between the models, (2) estimates from the correct model have little bias, and estimated standard errors are generally close to theoretical values, (3) there are problems in determining degrees of freedom for chi-squared goodness of fit tests, so that it is best to compare test statistics with simulated distributions, and (4) goodness of fit tests may not discriminate well between the three models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellows, T. S. andM. H. Birley (1981) Estimating developmental and mortality rates and stage recruitment from insect stage-frequency data.Res. Popul. Ecol. 23: 232–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, W. P., B. Dennis andP. L. Munholland (1989) Modelling grasshopper phenology with diffusion processes. 118–127. InL. L. McDonald, B. F. J., Manly, J. A. Lockwood andJ. A. Logan (eds)Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations. Spring-Verlag Lecture Notes in Statistics, Berlin.

  • Kempton, R. A. (1979) Statistical analysis of frequency data obtained from sampling an insect population grouped by stages. 401–418. InJ. K. Ord, G. P. Patil andC. Taille (eds)Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work. International Cooperative Publishing House, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, S. (1968) Estimation of the individual number entering each development stage in an insect population.Res. Popul. Ecol. 10: 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (1974) A comparison of methods for the analysis of stage-frequency data.Oecologia 17: 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (1985)The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (1989a) A review of methods for the analysis of stage-frequency data. 3–69. InL. L. McDonald, B. F. J. Manly, J. A. Lockwood andJ. A. Logan (eds)Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Statistics, Berlin.

  • Manly, B. F. J. (1989b)Stage-Structured Populations: Sampling Analysis and Simulation. Chapman and Hall, London (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munholland, P. L., J. D. Kalbfleisch andB. Dennis (1989) A stochastic model for insect life history data. 136–144. InL. L. McDonald, B. F. J. Manly, J. A. Lockwood andJ. A. Logan (eds)Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Statistics, Berlin.

  • Reed, T. E. andW. J. Schull (1968) A general maximum likelihood program.Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 20: 579–580.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straalen, N. M. van (1982) Demographic analysis of arthropod populations using a continuous stage variable.J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qasrawi, H. (1966)A Study of the Energy Flow in a Natural Population of the Grasshopper Chorthippus ParallelusZett. (Orthoptera Acridae). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Exeter.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manly, B.F.J., Seyb, A. A comparison of three maximum likelihood models for stage-frequency data. Res Popul Ecol 31, 367–380 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513212

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513212

Keywords

Navigation