Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates

Abstract

The authors have applied estimation theory to the problem of determining primary current distributions from measured neuromagnetic fields. In this procedure, essentially nothing is assumed about the source currents, except that they are spatially restricted to a certain region. Simulation experiments show that the results can describe the structure of the current flow fairly well. By increasing the number of measurements, the estimate can be made more localised. The current distributions may be also used as an interpolation and an extrapolation for the measured field patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahlfors, S. P., Ilmoniemi, R. J., andHämäläinen, M. S. (1992): ‘Estimates of visually evoked cortical currents,’Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,82, pp. 225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahonen, A. I., Hämäläinen, M. S., Kajola, M. J., Knuutila, J. E. T., Laine, P. P., Lounasmaa, O. V., Simola, J. T., Tesche, C. D. andVilkman, V. A. (1992): ‘A 122-channel magnetometer covering the whole head’in Dittmar, A. andFroment, J. C. (Eds.): Proc. Satellite Symp. on Neuroscience and Technology, 14th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon) pp. 16–20

  3. Clarke, C. J. S., Ioannides, A. A., andBolton, J. P. R. (1989): ‘Localised and distributed source solutions for the biomagnetic inverse problem I, inWilliamson, S. J., Hoke, M., Stroink, G., andKotani, M. (Eds.), ‘Advances in biomagnetism’ (Plenum, New York) pp. 587–590

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crowley, C. W., Greenblatt, R. E., andKhalil, I. (1989): ‘Minimum norm estimation of current distributions in realistic geometrics’, —Ibid., in pp. 603–606

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuffin, B. N., andCohen, D. (1977): ‘Magnetic fields of a dipole in special volume conductor shapes,’IEEE Trans.,BME-24, pp. 372–381

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dallas, W. J. (1985): ‘Fourier space solution to the magnetostatic imaging problems,’Appl. Opt.,24, pp. 4543–4546

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Munck, J. C., Hämäläinen, M. S., andPeters, M. J. (1991): ‘The use of the asymptotic expansion to speed up the computation of a series of spherical harmonics’,Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas.,12(Suppl. A), pp. 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golub, G., Heath, M., andWahba, C. (1979): ‘Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter,’Technometrics,21, pp. 215–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hämäläinen, M. S. andIlmoniemi, R. J. (1984): ‘Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions.’ Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University of Technology

  10. Hämäläinen, M. S. (1989): ‘A 24-channel planar gradiometer: System design and analysis of neuromagnetic data’in Williamson, S. J., Hoke, M., Stroink, G. andKotani, M. (Eds.): ‘Advances in biomagnetism’ (Plenum, New York) pp. 639–644

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hämäläinen, M. S., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R., Knuutila, J., andLounasmaa, O. V. (1993): ‘Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain,’Rev. Mod. Phys.,65, pp. 413–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ilmoniemi, R. J., andNumminen, J. K. (1992): ‘Synthetic magnetometer channels for standard representation of data’in Hoke, M., Erné, S. N., Okada, Y. C. andRomani, G. L. (Eds.): ‘Biomagnetism 91: clinical aspects’ (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp. 793–796

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ilmoniemi, R. J., Hämäläinen, M. S., andKnuutila, J. (1985): ‘The forward and inverse problems in the spherical model’in Weinberg, H., Stroink, G. andKatila, T. (Eds.): ‘Biomagnetism: applications & theory’ (Pergamon Press, New York) pp. 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ioannides, A., Bolton, J. andClarke, C. (1990): ‘Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem,’Inverse Probl.

  15. Jeffs, B., Leahy, R., andSingh, M. (1987): ‘An evaluation of methods for neuromagnetic image reconstruction,’IEEE Trans.,BME-34, pp. 713–723

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kajola, M., Ahlfors, S., Ehnholm, G. J., Hällström, J., Hämäläinen, M. S., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Kiriranta, M., Knuutila, J., Lounasmaa, O. V., Tesche, C. D., andVilkman, V. (1989): ‘A 24-channel magnetometer for brain research’in Williamson, S. J., Hoke, M., Stroink, G., andKotani, M. (Eds.): ‘Advances in biomagnetism’ (Plenum, New York) pp. 673–676

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kullmann, W. H., Jandt, K. D., Rehm, K., Schlitt, H. A., Dallas, W. J. andSmith, W. E. (1989): ‘A linear estimation approach to biomagnetic imaging’ —ibid. in pp. 571–574

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malmivuo, J. (1976): ‘On the detection of the magnetic heart vector—an application of the reciprocity theorem’. PhD Thesis, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Electrical Engineering Series 39, Finnish Academy of Technical Sciences, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McLain, D. H. (1974): ‘Drawing contours from arbitrary data points,’Comput. J.,17, pp. 318–324

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nenonen, J., Hämäläinen, M., andIlmoniemi, R. (1994): ‘Minimum-norm estimation in a boundary element torso model,’Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput., 1994,32, (1) 43–49

    Google Scholar 

  21. Plonsey, R. (1969): ‘Bioelectric phenomena’ (McGraw-Hill, New York) p. 212

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sarvas, J. (1987): ‘Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem,’Phys. Med. Biol.,32, pp. 11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh, M., Doria, D., Henderson, V. W. Huth, G. C., andBeatty, J. (1984): ‘Reconstruction of images from neuromagnetic fields’IEEE Trans.,NS-31, pp. 585–589

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, W. E., Dallas, W. J., Kullman, W. H., andSchlitt, H. A. (1990): ‘Linear estimation theory applied to the reconstruction of a 3-D vector current distribution,’Appl. Opt.,29, pp. 658–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tripp, J. H. (1983): ‘Physical concepts and mathematical models’in Williamson, S. J., Romani, G.-L., Kaufman, L., andModena, I. (Eds.): ‘Biomagnetism: an interdisciplinary approach’ (Plenum Press, New York) pp. 101–139

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williamson, S. J., andKaufman, L. (1981):‘Biomagnetism,’J. Magn. Magn. Mat.,22, pp. 129–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Hämäläinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hämäläinen, M.S., Ilmoniemi, R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 32, 35–42 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512476

Download citation

Keywords

  • Inverse problem
  • Minimum-norm estimate
  • Neuromagnetism