Mind & Society

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 57–72 | Cite as

How to build and use agent-based models in social science

Articles

Abstract

The use of computer simulation for building theoretical models in social science is introduced. It is proposed that agent-based models have potential as a “third way” of carrying out social science, in addition to argumentation and formalisation. With computer simulations, in contrast to other methods, it is possible to formalise complex theories about processes, carry out experiments and observe the occurrence of emergence. Some suggestions are offered about techniques for building agent-based models and for debugging them. A scheme for structuring a simulation program into agents, the environment and other parts for modifying and observing the agents is described. The article concludes with some references to modelling tools helpful for building computer simulations.

Keywords

agent based computational economics social simulation neural networks classifier systems genetic algorithms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, W.B. (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events,The Economic Journal, 99, pp. 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1997a)The Complexity of Cooperation (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R. (1997b) Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences, in R. Conte, R. Hegselmann & P. Terna (Eds.)Simulating social phenomena (Berlin, Springer), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
  4. Axtell, R.L., Epstein, J.M. (1994) Agent Based Modeling: Understanding Our Creations,The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, Winter 1994, pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
  5. Ballot, G. and Taymaz, E (1999) Technological change, learning and macro-economic co-ordination: an evolutionary model,Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2, <http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/2/3.html>.Google Scholar
  6. Beltratti, A., Margarita, S. & Terna, P. (1996)Neural Networks for Economic and Financial Modelling (London, ITCP).Google Scholar
  7. Brately, P. Fox, B. & Schrage, L.E. (1987)A guide to simulation (New York, Springer, 2nd edn.).Google Scholar
  8. Chattoe, E. & Gilbert, N. (1997) A simulation of adaptation mechanisms, in budgetary decision making, in R. Conte, R. Hegselmann & P. Terna (Eds.)Simulating social phenomena (Berlin, Springer).Google Scholar
  9. Garson, G.D. (1998)Neural networks: an introductory guide for social scientists (London, Sage).Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, N. (1995) Emergence in social simulation, in N. Gilbert & R. Conte (Eds.)Artificial Societies: the computer simulation of social life (London, UCL Press).Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, N. (1999) Multi-level simulation in Lisp-Stat,Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2, <http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/2/1/3.html>.Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert, N & Troitzsch, K.G. (1999)Simulation for the Social Scientist (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Hegselmann, R. (1996) Understanding social dynamics: the cellular automata approach, in K.G. Troitzsch, U. Mueller, G.N. Gilbert & J.E. Doran (Eds.)Social Science Microsimulation (Berlin, Springer).Google Scholar
  14. Hegselmann, R. (1998) Modelling social dynamics by cellular automata, in W.B.G. Liebrand, A. Novak & R. Hegselmann (Eds.)Computer modeling of social processes (London, Sage).Google Scholar
  15. Holland, J.H. & Miller, J.H. (1991) Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory,American Economic Review, 81(2), pp. 365–370.Google Scholar
  16. Hutchins, E. & Hazlehurst, B. (1995) How to invent a lexicon: the development of shared symbols in interaction, in G.N. Gilbert & R. Conte (Eds.)Artificial Societies (London, UCL Press).Google Scholar
  17. Kleijnen, J.P.C. (1998) Validation of Simulation, With or Without Real Data,Department of Information Systems and Auditing (BIKE)—Center for Economic Research (CentER) Working Paper, home page <http://cwis.kub.nl/∼few5/center/staff/kleijnen/cv2.htm>.Google Scholar
  18. Klüver, J. (1998) Modelling science as an adaptive and self-organising social system: concepts, theories and modelling tools, in P. Ahrweiler & N. Gilbert (Eds.)Computer simulations in science and technology studies (Berlin, Springer).Google Scholar
  19. Moss, S., Gaylard, H., Wallis, S. & Edmonds, B. (1988) SMDL: a multi-agent language for organizational modelling,Computational and mathematical organization theory, 4(1), pp. 43–70.Google Scholar
  20. Nowak, A. & B. Latané (1994) Simulating the emergence of social order from individual behaviour, in N. Gilbert & J. Doran (Eds.)Simulating Societies: the computer simulation of social phenomena (London: UCL Press).Google Scholar
  21. Ostrom, T. (1988) Computer simulation: the third symbol system,Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, pp. 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swarm, http://www.santafe.edu/projects/swarm.Google Scholar
  23. Terna, P. (1997) A laboratory for agent based computational economics, in R. Conte, R. Hegselmann & P. Terna (Eds)Simulating social phenomena (Berlin, Springer).Google Scholar
  24. Terna, P. (1998a) Simulation Tools for Social Scientists: Building Agent Based Models withSwarm,Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1, <http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/2/4.html>Google Scholar
  25. Terna, P. (1998b) ABCDE: Agent Based Chaotic Dynamic Emergence, in J. Sichman, R. Conte & N. Gilbert (Eds.)Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, LNAI series, vol. 1534, (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar
  26. Verhagen, H. (1999) ACTS in action: Sim-ACTS—a simulation model based on ACTS theory, in J. Sichman, R. Conte & N. Gilbert (Eds.)Multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation (Berlin, Springer).Google Scholar
  27. Wooldridge M. & N.R. Jennings (1995) Intelligent agents: theory and practice,Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), pp. 115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Woolgar, S. (Ed.) (1988)Knowledge and reflexivity: new frontiers in the sociology of knowledge (London, Sage).Google Scholar
  29. Zeigler, B.P. (1985)Theory of modelling and simulation (New York, Wiley).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Rosselli, Rosenberg & Sellier 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research on Simulation for the Social Sciences, School of Human SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze economiche e finanziarieUniversità di TorinoTorinoItalia

Personalised recommendations