Skip to main content
Log in

Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the discovery of voluminous discordant empirical evidence, maximizing expected utility is rapidly disappearing as the core of the theory of human rationality, and a theory of bounded rationality, embracing both the processes and products of choice, is replacing it. There remains a large task of organizing our picture of economic and social processes and adding the new facts needed to shape the theory in an empirically sound way. It is also urgent that new tools now available for conducting empirical inquiry and constructing models be incorporated in social science graduate education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beard, C.A. (1913)An economic interpretation of the constitution of the United States (New York, Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C.A. (1922)The economic basis of politics (New York, A.A. Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981)A treatise on the family (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. & Swistak, P. (1997) The evolutionary stability of cooperation,American Political Science Review, 91, pp. 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. & Prietula, M.J. (1994)Computational organization theory (Hillsdale, Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gode, D.K. & Sunder, S. (1997) What makes markets allocationally efficient?,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, pp. 604–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Madison, J. & Jay, J. (1787)The Federalist Papers (Richmond, Westvaco, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1985) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision-making under risk,Econometrica, 47, pp. 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690)On civil government (London, J. M. Dent, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1513)The Prince (London, Oxford University Press, 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C.E. (1931)The making of citizens (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, C.E. & Gosnell H.F. (1924)Non-voting (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1848)Principles of political economy (New York, Longmans, 1920).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G.P. (1949)Social structure (New York, The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, J.F. (1961) Rational expectations and the theory of price movements,Econometrica, 29, pp. 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. & Winter, S.G. (1982)An evolutionary theory of economic change (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944)The theory of games and economic behavior (Princeton, Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997 edition)The Republic (Ware, Wordsworth Editions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prietula, M.J., Carley, K.M. & Gasser, L. (Eds.) (1998)Simulating organizations (Cambridge, AAAI Press-The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1994) In search of better understanding of economic behavior, in A. Heertje (Ed.),The makers of modern economics (New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment,Psychological Review, 63, pp. 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776)The wealth of nations (New York, The Modern Library, 1937). (Text based on 5th edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (1962) An experimental study of competitive market behavior,The Journal of Political Economy, 70, pp. 111–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (1989) Theory, experiment and economics,The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1), pp. 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. & Becker, G.S. (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum,American Economic Review, 67, pp. 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,Science, 211 (Jan. 30), pp. 435–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire, F. M. A. (1746)Dictionnaire philosophique (Paris, Garnier, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, H.A. Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow. Mind & Society 1, 25–39 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512227

Keywords

Navigation