Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How do norms emerge? An outline of a theory

  • Articles
  • Section on “Norms, Society and Cognition’
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social science literature abounds with unconnected and, so it seems, diverse propositions about the emergence of norms. This article sets out to show that many of these propositions only differ in regard to terminology. Proponents of different theoretical orientations seem to accept a key hypothesis that is called “instrumentality proposition”: norms emerge if they are instrumental for attaining the goals of a group of actors. Apart from a problematic functionalist version the article focuses on an individualistic version: if actors want to achieve certain goals and if a norm is instrumental to attain these goals individuals perform those actions that bring about the norm. This proposition involves several assumptions that are discussed.

This version of the instrumentality proposition explains norms that are planned (i.e., that are second-order public goods). In order to account for the evolutionary emergence of norms a second version of the instrumentality proposition is discussed. It assumes that actors do not want to create a general norm but aim at providing certain private goods in interaction situations. For example, smokers sanction non-smokers in order not to be exposed to smoke in the interaction situation, but non-smokers do not want to engender a general non-smoking-norm. However, the aggregated effect of those actions is often a general norm.

The article further explores problems of the two instrumentality propositions, the extent to which they answer important questions of a theory of norm emergence and alternative propositions to explain norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1988)Attitudes, personality, and behavior (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1996) The social psychology of decision making, in E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.),Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (New York and London, Guilford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980)Understanding and predicting social behavior (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1986) An evolutionary approach to norms,American Political Science Review, 80, pp. 1095–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1989)Economic analysis of property rights (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R.H., De Figueiredo Jr., R.J.P. & Weingast, B.R. (1998) The politics of interpretation: Rationality, culture, and transition,Politics and Society, 26, pp. 603–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri, C., Jeffrey, R. & Skyrms, B. (Eds.) (1997)The dynamics of norms (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B.J. & Thomas, E.J. (Eds.) (1966)Role theory: Concepts and research (New York, Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1997a) The moral sense,International Sociology, 12, pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1997b) The present relevance of Max Weber’sWertrationalität, in P. Koslowski (Ed.)Methodology of the social sciences, ethics, and economics in the newer historical school from Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker (Berlin, Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. & Ricerson, P.J. (1985)Culture and the evolutionary process (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, M.C. & Nee, V. (1998)The new institutionalism in sociology (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, R.L. (1995) The rational choice theory of social institutions: cooperation, coordination, and communication, in J.S. Banks & E.A. Hanushek (Eds.),Modern political economy. Old topics, new directions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1990)Foundations of social theory (Cambridge, Mass., and London, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S.E.S. & Ostrom, E. (1995) A grammar of institutions,American Political Science Review, 89, pp. 582–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967) Toward a theory of property rights,American Economic Review, 57, pp. 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1998) The new institutionalism: Avenues of collaboration,Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154, pp. 696–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, Th. (1990)Economic behavior and instutions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1994)The civilizing process: The history of manners and state formation and civilization (Cambridge, Mass., Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson, R.C. (1991)Order without law. How neightbors settle disputes (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989)The cement of society. A study of social order (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G.A. (1998)Morel tales. The culture of mushrooming (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G.A. (2001) Framing norms: Mushrooming and the culture of expectations and explantations, in M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.),Social norms (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J.P. (1965) Norms: The problem of definition and classification,American Journal of Sociology, 70, pp. 586–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J.P. (1968) The study of norms, in D.L. Sills (Ed.),International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 11 (New York, MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1980) The emergence of norms,Ethics, 90, pp. 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1987)Principles of group solidarity (Berkeley, University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. & Opp, K.-D. (2001) What have we learned about the emergence of social norms?, inSocial norms (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. (1989) Collective action and the second-order free-rider problem,Rationality and Society, 1, pp. 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. (1990) Collective sanctions and complicance norms: A formal theory of group-mediated social control,American Sociological Review, 55, pp. 366–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. (1952)Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. (1965)Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science (New York and London, Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. (1974)Social behavior. Its elementary forms (New York, Harcourt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, Ch. (2001a) Sociological perspectives on the emergence of norms, in M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.),Social norms (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, Ch. (2001b) Sex and sanctioning: Evaluating two theories of norm emergence, in M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.),Social norms (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. & Opp, K.-D. (1997) Probing the character of norms: A factorial survey analysis of the norms of political action,American Sociological Review, 62, pp. 947–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1992)Institutions and social conflict (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1995) Models, interpretations, and theories: Constructing explanations of institutional emergence and change, in J. Knight & I. Sened (Eds.),Explaining social institutions (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. & Ensminger, J. (1998) Conflict over changing social norms: Bargaining, ideology, and enforcement, in M.C. Brinton & V. Nee (Eds.),The new institutionalism in sociology (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1969)Convention. A philosophical study (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, G. (1996) Ending footbinding and infibulation: A convention account,American Sociological Review, 61, pp. 999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. (1956) Formalization of functionalism, in E. Nagel (Ed.),Logic without metaphysics (Glencoe, Ill., Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. & Ingram, P. (1998) Embeddedness and beyond: Institutions, exchange and social structure, in M. Brinton & V. Nee (Eds.),The new institutionalism in economic sociology (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, A. (1986) The California gold rush: Social structure and transaction costs, in S. Lindenberg, J.S. Coleman & S. Nowak (Eds.),Approaches to social theory (New York. Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1980) Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collection action,American Journal of Sociology, 85, pp. 1356–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (1982) The evolutionary emergence of norms,British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, pp. 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (1983)Die Entstehung sozialer Normen. Ein Integrationsversuch soziologischer, sozialpsychologischer und ökonomischer Erklärungen (Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (1990) The attenuation of customs, in M. Hechter, K.-D. Opp & R. Wippler (Eds.),Social institutions. Their emergence, maintenance, and effects (New York, Aldine de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (1997) Norms, rationalizations and collective political action. A rational choice perspective,Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133, pp. 241–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (1999) Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action,Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, pp. 171–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (2001) Social networks and the emergence of protest norms, in M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.),Social norms (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D. (2002 forthcoming) When do norms emerge by human design and by the unintended consequences for human action? The example of the no-smoking norm,Rationality and Society, 14.

  • Ostrom, E. (1990)Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993)Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy (Princeton, Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, E.H. (1999) Symbolic interests and meaningful purposes: Conceiving rational choice as cultural theory,Rationality and Society, 11, pp. 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommetveit, R. (1954)Social norms and roles (Oslo, Universitetsforlaget).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. (1996)Institutions in economics. The old and the new institutionalism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Th.C. (1960)The strategy of conflict (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A. (1981)The economic theory of instutions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1998) Normative expectations: The simultaneous evolution of institutions and norms, in B.-N. Avner & L. Putterman (Eds.),Economics, values, and organization, pp. 73–100 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W.G. (1906)Folkways A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals (Boston, Ginn and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1996) When rationality fails, in J. Friedman (Ed.),Pathologies of rational choice theory. Economic models of politics reconsidered, pp. 223–234 (New Haven and London, Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977)The emergence of norms (Oxford, Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V.J. (1994)Rules & choice in economics (London, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, Th. (1998) Strategische Rationalität und die Realisierung sozialer Normen, in H.-P. Müller & M. Schmid (Eds.),Norm, Herrschaft und Vertrauen. Beiträge zu James S. Colemans Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie (Opladen and Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.M. (1968) The concept of norms in D.L. Sillse (Ed.),International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 11 (New York, Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, A.S. (1997) Thick rationality and the missing “brute fact”: The limits of rationalist incorporations of norms and ideas,Journal of Politics, 59, pp. 1001–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opp, KD. How do norms emerge? An outline of a theory. Mind & Society 2, 101–128 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512077

Keywords

Navigation