American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 389–411 | Cite as

Community psychology values and the culture of graduate training: A self-study

  • Judit Alcalde
  • Richard Walsh-Bowers
Article

Abstract

In this self-study of an M.A. program in community psychology, the authors focused on evaluation of training goals related to the values of collaboration, empowerment, and diversity. Employing quantitative and qualitative methods, the evaluator, a thesis student in the program, cooperated with a stakeholder committee and other student, staff, and faculty members of the program to construct the methods and interpret the findings. Although the converging sources of data showed that the program was meeting its process goals to some extent, several key issues in the culture of training, such as the status of women, the psychological sense of community, and a supportive learning environment, needed improvement. The authors interpret the findings in terms of the impact of the university system and patriarchal norms on training in community psychology.

Key Words

graduate training community psychology values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bond, M. A. (1988). Division 27 sexual harassment survey: Definition, impact and environmental context.The Community Psychologist, 21, 7–10.Google Scholar
  2. Chein, I. (1966). Some sources of divisiveness among psychologists.American Psychologist, 21, 333–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feis, C. L. (1990). Daring to be different: A graduate student's perspective. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.),Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods (pp. 201–205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feis, C. L., Mavis, B. E., Weth, J. E., & Davidson, II, W. S. (1990). Graduate training and employment experiences of community psychologists.Professional Psychology, 21, 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, L. A., & Rossman, K. M. (1992). Gender and the mentoring process for women: Implications for professional development.Professional Psychology, 23, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress.Journal of Higher Education, 59, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffnung, R. J., Morris, M., & Jex, S. (1986). Training community psychologists at the Master's level: A case study of outcomes.American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly, J. G. (1979). T'Aint what you do, it's the way you do it.American Journal of Community Psychology, 7, 244–258.Google Scholar
  9. Kelly, J. G. (1984). Interpersonal and organizational resources for the continued development of community psychology.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Messer, S. B., Fishman, D. B., & McCrady, B. S. (1991). Conducting a self-study in a professional psychology program.Professional Psychology, 22, 405–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore, T. (1977). Social change and community psychology. In I. Iscoe, B. Bloom, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.),Community psychology in transition: Proceedings of the national conference in community psychology (pp. 257–266). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  13. Morrell, J. A. (1984). Making evaluation viable: The response of graduate programs in evaluation.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mulvey, A. (1988). Community psychology and feminism: Tensions and commonalities.Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 70–83.Google Scholar
  15. Mulvey, A., & Bond, M. A. (1990, October).Feminism and community psychology. Keynote address at the Northeastern Regional Community Psychology Conference, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
  16. Nelson, G., & Tefft, B. M. (1982). A survey of graduate education in community psychology in Canada.Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 1, 6–13.Google Scholar
  17. Paelet, D. (1978). The M.A. postgraduate marketplace in community psychology: A case study.Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 175–179.Google Scholar
  18. Patton, M. Q. (1980).Qualitative evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Patton, M. Q. (1986).Utilization-focused evaluation (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Pyke, S. W. (1996). Sexual harassment and sexual intimacy in learning environments.Canadian Psychology, 37, 13–22.Google Scholar
  21. Rappaport, J. (1977).Community psychology: Values, research, and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  22. Reiff, R. (1975). Of cabbages and kings.American Journal of Community Psychology, 3, 187–196.Google Scholar
  23. Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong with the concept of empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ristock, J. L. (1987, June),Feminists in community psychology: Lofty idealists or social change agents? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Sanford, N. (1969). Research with students as action and education.American Psychologist, 24, 544–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanford, N. (1982). Social psychology: Its place in personology.American Psychologist, 37, 896–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, J. C. (1990).Psychoanalytic roots of patriarchy: The neurotic foundations of social order. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Durlak, J. A., & Smith, C. (1994). Multicultural training practices in community psychology programs.American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 785–798.Google Scholar
  29. Swift, C., Bond, M., & Serrano-Garcia, I. (in press). In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.),Handbook of community psychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  30. Trickett, E. J. (1984). Toward a distinctive community psychology: An ecological metaphor for the conduct of community research and the nature of training.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trickett, E. J., Irving, J. B., & Perl, H. (1984). Curriculum issues in community psychology: The ecology of programme development and the socialization of students.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 141–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trickett, E. J., Watts, R., & Birman, D. (1993). Human diversity and community psychology: Still hazy after all these years.Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 264–279.Google Scholar
  33. Tyler, F. B., & Gatz, M. (1976). If community psychology is so great, why don't we try it?Professional Psychology, 7, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walfish, S., Polifka, J. A., & Stenmark, D. E. (1984). An evaluation of skill acquisition in community psychology training.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 165–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walsh, R. T. (1987). The evolution of the research relationship in community psychology.American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 773–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watts, R. J. (1994). Graduate training for a diverse world.American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 807–810.Google Scholar
  37. Weinstein, R. S. (1994). Pushing the frontiers of multicultural training in community psychology.American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 811–820.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judit Alcalde
    • 1
  • Richard Walsh-Bowers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations