Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of industrial modernization programs: The field agent's perspective

  • Symposium Contrasting Perspectives on the Evaluation of Industrial Modernization
  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a field agent's perspective on the factors that influence the success of industrial modernization services. We begin with an overview of the field agent's role in the industrial extension system and discuss the technical assistance services typically provided by a field agent. The field agent's role is differentiated from that of other stakeholders such as legislators, agency staff, and program managers. We then consider pre- and post-project perspectives of positive outcomes from industrial extension services. The article argues that the field agent's perspective is closely connected to that of the manufacturing customer. Implications for shared communication among stakeholders and improving program outcomes are discussed. The article draws on the experiences of the authors in the manufacturing extension program in Georgia-the Georgia Manufacturing Extension Alliance (GMEA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Economic Development Institute.A Proposal to Create the Georgia Manufacturing Technology Extension Center. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappina, P., and A. Ford. “Technical Assistance: Analyzing Project Success Potential.”Technology Transfer Society 17th Annual Meeting Proceedings, June 1992, pp. 191–198.

  • Sabel, C. “A Measure of Federalism: Assessing Manufacturing Technology Centers.”Research Policy 25, 1996, pp. 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira, P., and J. Youtie. “Evaluating Technology Deployment at the State Level: Methods, Results, and Insights from the Georgia Manufacturing Extension Alliance.”Journal of Technology Transfer, Winter 1998.

  • Shapira, P., J. Youtie, and J. D. Roessner, “Current Practices in the Evaluation of US Industrial Modernization Programs.”Research Policy 25, 1996, pp. 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce.MEP Successes: A Case Study Approach. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST Special Publication 916, 1997.

  • Youtie, J., P. Shapira, and J. D. Roessner.Manufacturing Assistance Program Needs Assessment Guide, Volume 2, Firm-Level Needs Assessment Approaches. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Springfield, R., Youtie, J. Evaluation of industrial modernization programs: The field agent's perspective. J Technol Transfer 23, 43–47 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511615

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511615

Keywords

Navigation