Skip to main content
Log in

A new strategy for speeding Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms

  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have become popular as a basis for drawing inference from complex statistical models. Two common difficulties with MCMC algorithms are slow mixing and long run-times, which are frequently closely related. Mixing over the entire state space can often be aided by careful tuning of the chain's transition kernel. In order to preserve the algorithm's stationary distribution, however, care must be taken when updating a chain's transition kernel based on that same chain's history. In this paper we introduce a technique that allows the transition kernel of the Gibbs sampler to be updated at user specified intervals, while preserving the chain's stationary distribution. This technique seems to be beneficial both in increasing efficiency of the resulting estimates (via Rao-Blackwellization) and in reducing the run-time. A reinterpretation of the modified Gibbs sampling scheme introduced in terms of auxiliary samples allows its extension to the more general Metropolis-Hastings framework. The strategies we develop are particularly helpful when calculation of the full conditional (for a Gibbs algorithm) or of the proposal distribution (for a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm) is computationally expensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams D I, Goldman A I, Launer C, Korvick J A, Neaton J D, Crane L R et al. (1994) Comparative trial of didanosine and zalcitabine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection who are intolerant or have failed zidovudine therapy. New England Journal of Medicine330: 657–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Besag J, Green P J (1993) Spatial statistics and Bayesian computation (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Ser. B55: 25–37

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Casella G, Robert C P (1996) Rao-Blackwellisation of sampling schemes. Biometrika83: 81–94

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Damien P, Wakefield J, Walker S (1999) Gibbs sampling for Bayesian nonconjugate and hierarchical models using auxiliary variables. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Ser. B61: 331–344

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelfand A E, Sahu S K, Carlin B P (1995) Efficient parametrizations for normal linear mixed models. Biometrika82: 479–488

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelfand A E, Smith A F M (1990) Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association85: 398–409

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Geyer C J, Thompson E A (1995) Annealing Markov chain Monte Carlo with applications to ancestral inference. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.90: 909–920

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilks W R, Roberts G O (1996) Strategies for improving MCMC. In: Gilks W R, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D J (eds.) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, pp. 89–114. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilks W R, Roberts G O, Sahu S K (1998) Adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo through regeneration. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.93: 1045–1054

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hastings W K (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika57: 97–109

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hills S E, Smith AFM (1992) Parametrization issues in Bayesian inference. In: Bernardo J M, Berger J O, Dawid, A P, Smith A F M (eds.) Bayesian statistics 4, pp. 641–649. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hodges J S (1998) Some algebra and geometry for hierarchical models, applied to diagnostics (with discussion). J. Roy. Stat. Soc., Ser B60: 497–536

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kass R E, Carlin B P, Gelman A, Neal R (1998) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice: a roundtable discussion. Amer. Stat.52: 93–100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J S, Wong W H, Kong A (1995) Correlation structure and convergence rate of the Gibbs sampler with various scans. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B57: 157–169

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mira A, Tierney L (2002) Efficiency and convergence properties of slice samplers. Scandinavian Journal of Stat.29: 1–12

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Neal R M (1996) Sampling from multimodal distributions using tempered transitions. Stat. and Comp.6: 353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sargent D J, Hodges J S (1997) Smoothed ANOVA with application to subgroup analysis. Research Report 97-002, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota

  18. Sargent D J, Hodges J S, Carlin B P (2000) Structured Markov chain Monte Carlo. Journal of the Computational and Graphical Statistics9: 217–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Spiegelhalter D J, Thomas A, Best N, Gilks W R (1995) BUGS: Bayesian Inference Using Gibbs Sampling, Version 0.50. Technical report, Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge University

  20. Swendsen R H, Wang J S (1987) Non-universal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Letters58: 86–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tierney L, Mira A (1999) Some adaptive Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian inference. Statistics in Medicine18: 2507–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Partial financial support from FAR 2002-3, University of Insubria is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mira, A., Sargent, D.J. A new strategy for speeding Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Statistical Methods & Applications 12, 49–60 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511583

Key words

Navigation