Skip to main content
Log in

Quasi-likelihood fromM-estimators: A numerical comparison with empirical likelihood

  • Statistical Methods
  • Published:
Statistical Methods and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In this paper we compare two robust pseudo-likelihoods for a parameter of interest, also in the presence of nuisance parameters. These functions are obtained by computing quasi-likelihood and empirical likelihood from the estimating equations which define robustM-estimators. Application examples in the context of linear transformation models are considered. Monte Carlo studies are performed in order to assess the finite-sample performance of the inferential procedures based on quasi-and empirical likelihood, when the objective is the construction of robust confidence regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adimari G (1997) On the empirical likelihood ratio for smooth functions of M-functionals.Scand. J. Statist. 24: 47–59

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Adimari G, Ventura L (2001) Robust inference for generalized linear models with application to logistic regression.Statisti. & Probab. Lett. 55: 413–419

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Adimari G, Ventura L (2002) Quasi-profile loglikelihoods for unbiased estimating functions.Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., to appear

  • Barndorff-Nielsen OE (1995) Quasi profile and directed likelihoods from estimating functions.Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 47: 461–464

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bellio R, Brazzale AR, Ventura L (2001) Adjusted quasi-profile likelihoods and robustness. In: Proceedings of the 16th international workshop on statistical modelling, Odense Denmark, July 2–6 2001: 413–416

  • Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stahel WA (1986) Robust statistics. The approach based on influence functions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Heritier S, Ronchetti E (1994) Robust bounded-influence tests in general parametric models.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89: 897–904

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maronna RA, Bustos O, Yohai VJ (1979) Bias- and efficiency-robustness of general M-estimators for regression with random carriers. In: Gasser T, Rosenblatt M (eds) Smoothing techniques for curve estimation. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 757, pp. 91–116. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P (1991) Quasi-likelihood and estimating functions. In: Hinkley DV, Reid N, Snell EJ (eds) Statistical theory and modelling, pp. 265–286. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Monti AC, Ronchetti E (1993) On the relationship between empirical likelihood and empirical saddlepoint approximation for multivariateM-estimators.Biometrika 80: 329–338

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AB (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional.Biometrika 75: 237–249

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AB (1990) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions.Ann. Statist. 18: 90–120

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen AB (1991) Empirical likelihood for linear models.Ann. Statist. 22: 300–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsao M, Zhou J (2001) On the robustness of empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for location.Can. J. Statis. 29: 129–140

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adimari, G., Ventura, L. Quasi-likelihood fromM-estimators: A numerical comparison with empirical likelihood. Statistical Methods & Applications 11, 175–185 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511485

Key words

Navigation