Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 209–220 | Cite as

Forgiveness in adolescents, young, middle-aged, and older adults

  • Michèle Girard
  • Etienne Mullet
Article

Abstract

The evolution of the propensity to forgive an offense was studied in a sample of 236 people from various age groups. The effect of a number of circumstances connected with the offense was considered: intent to harm, severity of consequences, cancellation of consequences, social proximity to the offender, apologies from the offender, and the attitude of others. The method was an application of information integration theory. A global increase in the propensity to forgive from adolescence to old age was observed. Several interactions between age and circumstances were found: (a) The effect of the cancellation factor was higher in young adolescents and in the very old than in the middle-aged, (b) the attitude of others and the restoration of harmony factors were important only in adolescents. Finally, the structure of the Forgiveness schema was shown to be an additive one, regardless of the age of the participants.

Key words

Forgiveness aging information integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, N. H. (1991a). Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol II (pp. 243–275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1991b). Moral-social development. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol III (pp. 137–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N. H. (1996).A functional theory of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, K. S. (1977) Forgiveness revisited: God's and ours.Brethen Life and Thought, 22, 199–209.Google Scholar
  5. Downie, R. S. (1965). Forgiveness.Philosophical Quarterly, 15, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Enright, R. D. & the Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.),Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 1 (pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Enright, R. D., Santos, M. J. D. & Al-Mabuk, R. (1989). The adolescent as forgiver.Journal of Adolescence, 12, 95–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helb, J. H., & Enright, R. D. (1993). Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females.Psychotherapy, 30, 658–667.Google Scholar
  9. Hommers, W., & Anderson, N. H. (1991). Moral algebra of harm and recompense. In N. H. Anderson (Ed.),Contributions to information integration theory: Vol II (pp. 101–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Howe, E. S., & Loftus, T. C. (1996) Integration of certainty, severity, and celerity information in judged deterrence value: Further evidence and methodological equivalence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hughes, M. (1975). Forgiveness.Analysis, 35, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.),Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  13. Minas, A. C. (1975). God and forgiveness.Philosophical Quarterly, 25, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy, J. G. (1982) Forgiveness and resentment.Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 7, 503–516.Google Scholar
  15. Neblett, W. R. (1974). Forgiveness and ideals.Mind.,83, 269–275.Google Scholar
  16. Newman, L. E. (1987). The quality of mercy: On the duty to forgive in the Judaic tradition.Journal of Religious Ethics, 15, 141–150.Google Scholar
  17. Przygotzki, N., & Mullet, E. (1997). Moral judgment and aging.European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 15–22.Google Scholar
  18. Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C.-R. (1992).Current developments related to measuring forgiveness. Paper presenter at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, October.Google Scholar
  19. Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C.-R., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood.Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Surber, C. E. (1977). Developmental processes in social inference: Averaging of intentions and consequences in moral judgment.Developmental Psychology, 13, 654–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michèle Girard
    • 1
  • Etienne Mullet
    • 2
  1. 1.Université de LimogesLimogesFrance
  2. 2.Ecole Pratique des Hautes EtudesFrance

Personalised recommendations